Legal Funding Journal is dedicated to informing and engaging the global legal funding community through daily news, insight, analysis and original content.

By Harry Moran | May 14, 2025

Alexander Wolfson, a highly experienced barrister of more than 25 years standing, has issued an opt-out class action claim against software giant Microsoft. He is issuing the claim on behalf of all UK-domiciled natural and legal persons (including public bodies) that purchased licences for certain specified Microsoft software products (including Microsoft Office and Windows).

The claims allege that the software giant abused its market dominance and engaged in conduct that restricted competition to its new licences from pre-owned licences for Microsoft products. That conduct affected and inflated the prices of both new licences and pre-owned licences.

The claim is one of the most significant class action cases currently underway in the UK, with a potential value reaching into the billions.

Wolfson has retained the services of the Head of Competition at Stewarts, Kate Pollock, alongside partners Stuart Carson and Marc Jones (and others), and is instructing Counsel teams at both Monckton and Matrix Chambers, together with a team of experts to provide testimony on the economics of the case. The claim is funded by Harbour.

Alex Wolfson, Proposed Class Representative, said: “Microsoft’s actions have had a significant and far-reaching impact on UK consumers, businesses and public bodies. This claim seeks to hold Microsoft to account and to secure compensation for the many affected members of the class. With billions of pounds potentially at stake, this case is about ensuring fairness in the digital marketplace and ensuring even the largest tech companies play by the rules.”

Kate Pollock, Head of Competition Litigation at Stewarts, said: “Microsoft’s conduct has had a profound and costly impact on millions of individuals and private and public sector organisations that rely on its software for daily business operations. We believe that Microsoft abused its market dominance by imposing restrictive licensing practices that effectively shut down competition and inflated prices. We’re proud to be supporting Alexander Wolfson in bringing this claim. With our specialist experience in complex competition litigation, we are well placed to help secure justice for the millions affected. This case has the potential to restore greater fairness and accountability to the UK’s increasingly digital economy.”

Ellora MacPherson, Managing Director and Chief Investment Officer at Harbour, which is funding the case, said: “We are delighted to be able to support Alex Wolfson, Kate Pollock and the rest of the Stewarts team by funding this important case which will give access to justice to tens of thousands of individuals and public and private organisations in the UK. This action is likely to be one of the largest the UK has seen and is an example of how big corporate entities can be held to account.”

For more information about the case, visit MicrosoftClaim.com

Commercial Legal Innovation

By Harry Moran | May 14, 2025

For litigation funders in their early years of growth post-founding, the ability to continue to raise capital and expand to new markets are often key signs of strengths in these businesses, as demonstrated by an Australian family law funder with its latest announcement.

In a post on LinkedIn, JustFund revealed that it has launched funding services for family matters in New Zealand, marking its first expansion outside of Australia since the funder’s inception three years ago. The announcement explained that JustFund is looking to support both lawyers who need support for their clients or an individual who needs the financial assistance to secure legal representation.

This expansion follows JustFund’s $92 million capital raise in November of last year, with the funds consisting of a combination of seed round financing, a senior debt facility, and additional mezzanine funding. At the time of the capital raise, JustFund said that in the two years since its founding it had provided more than $95 million in legal funding for family law cases, resulting in over $1 billion in relationship property settlements.

Andy O’Connor, co-founder and CEO of Just Fund, commented on the announcement saying, “It's been an incredible first week meeting with client-centric law firms looking to deliver solutions for their clients.” O’Connor also stated that JustFund is recruiting for its Auckland office to support this expansion, with the funder hiring for family lawyer and client experience positions.

More information about JustFund’s offering to New Zealand clients can be found on its website.

Commercial Regulatory Issues

By Harry Moran | May 14, 2025

A statement released by Litigation Capital Management (LCM) offers a response to recent media speculation that the funder is facing a potential investigation by the office of the Dubai Public Prosecutor (DPP).

LCM’s statement is as follows: “The article states that the original complaint was made in 2022. The Company confirms that it has not been contacted by any legal authority, either historically or recently, in relation to the allegation. Furthermore, the Company does not believe any such allegation, were it to be made, would have any merit whatsoever. The Company is investigating further and will update the market as appropriate.”

The article that prompted LCM’s statement was published by Intelligence Online on 13 May, claiming that “the Dubai Public Prosecutor's office commenced a court-assisted investigation into LCM and its chief executive Patrick Moloney in March.” The headline of the article suggests that the investigation is a “money laundering probe”, with the DPP’s office reportedly “examining details from a complaint made in late 2022.

The full article available to Intelligence Online subscribers here.

Public

Announcements Commercial People Moves

Angeion Group Makes Significant Additions to its Board of Directors

By Harry Moran | May 14, 2025

Angeion Group, a leading provider of legal notice and settlement administration services, today announced the addition of three independent members to its Board of Directors. This milestone underscores Angeion's strategic growth trajectory and commitment to strong governance, innovation, and operational excellence.

The newly appointed board members are three highly accomplished executives whose leadership has shaped the modern legal and professional services industries:

Rich Antoneck, Chief Executive Officer of Veritext Legal Solutions, leads the largest deposition and alternative dispute resolution firm in North America. Antoneck brings more than 20 years of private equity-backed executive leadership, including prior roles as CFO of Accuity Solutions and SourceMedia.
David Perla, Vice Chair of Burford Capital, is a recognized innovator in legal services. Formerly President of Bloomberg Law and co-founder of Pangea3 (acquired by Thomson Reuters), Perla oversees policy, marketing, and industry engagement at Burford.
Lou Andreozzi, former Chairman of Bloomberg Law and CEO of LexisNexis North American Legal Markets, is a legal tech pioneer. He has driven growth and product innovation at Martindale-Hubbell and continues to serve as a trusted advisor and board member across private equity and legal-tech ventures.

"This board brings together an exceptional combination of legal acumen, business strategy, and operational expertise," said Lee Minkoff, Managing Director at Renovus Capital Partners, the private equity sponsor of Angeion Group. "Angeion is operating at the forefront of legal administration, and this step reinforces our confidence in the company's leadership, vision, and continued trajectory of operational excellence and growth."

Our growth has always been fueled by bold thinking and relentless execution, and the addition of Rich, David, and Lou takes that to the next level," said Steven Weisbrot, President and CEO of Angeion Group. "Each has fundamentally shaped the way legal services are delivered - from litigation finance to legal tech and professional services at scale. Their insights will help us sharpen our strategy, deepen client impact, and push the boundaries of legal administration.

About Angeion Group

Angeion Group is an industry leader in legal notice and settlement administration, known for its use of technology, analytics, and hands-on client support to execute efficient, compliant, and effective legal administration services. With a proven track record in class action, mass tort, and bankruptcy administration, Angeion continues to redefine industry standards through precision, transparency, and innovation.

Commercial Fundraising

By Harry Moran | May 13, 2025

As LFJ reported in February, one legal funder in Germany is seeking to elevate its engagement in the country with a new fund that demonstrates significant ambition for the growth of litigation financing in this underserved market.

In an update posted by FORIS AG, the German litigation funder revealed that its FORIS Centris Litigation Financing Fund I has already attracted strong market interest from professional and institutional investors, allowing for case financing to begin. According to the post, the fund was already sufficiently capitalized in February to start backing lawsuits. FORIS AG launched this fund in partnership with Liechtenstein-based CAIAC Fund Management AG and Vienna-based Centris Capital AG.

Frederick Iwans, CEO of FORIS AG, said that the funder was confident it will be able to build on this momentum and reach the fund’s target of financing 20 to 25 cases within the next two years. Iwans also shed some light on the types of cases the fund was able to finance, explaining that FORIS AG had seen “a significant increase in financing requests or cases with amounts in dispute exceeding €50 million”. He also suggested that it was even possible for the fund to support cases above the €100 million threshold.

Michael Nagy, CEO of Centris Capital AG, said that he believes the fund has “hit a nerve” with the market and highlighted that they have already received twelve subscriptions to the fund. Nagy went on to explain that the uncorrelated nature of the litigation financing fund is particularly attractive to investors, given the ongoing turmoil in the stock market and the opportunity for these investors to diversify both their portfolios and risk profiles.

Commercial Regulatory Issues

By Harry Moran | May 13, 2025

Although the presence and visibility of legal funding in India is limited, a recent judgment re-affirming the legality of litigation funding will no doubt be seen as a positive sign for supporters of the nascent litigation finance market in the country.

An article on Verdictum covers a ruling in the Bombay High Court which affirmed that third-party litigation funding is neither illegal nor does it violate Section 23 of the Indian Contract Act. The judgment was handed down following the appeal of a decision in the City Civil Court which had quashed the amalgamation of two trusts, ruling that it was a matter of “champertous litigation” and was therefore prohibited by Section 23.

The background of the case begins with the Assistant Charity Commissioner’s approval of a 2005 amalgamation of the Rizvi Education Society and the Kailash Seva Sadan Trust, with the approval later being challenged by the Brihan Mumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) in the City Civil Court.

In his judgment for the High Court, Justice Sharmila U Deshmukh found that it “cannot be countenanced that third party funding of litigation is per se illegal and violates Section 23 of Contract Act, apart from the fact that such contemplation is alien to an inquiry under Section 50A (2) of Trusts Act.”

Whilst this ruling was focused on a specific case within the limited context of the amalgamation of these two trusts, the repeated affirmation of litigation funding’s legality in India is a welcome sight for funders considering expanding their services to this jurisdiction.

The full judgment by the High Court in Rizvi Education Society & Ors. v. The Brihan Mumbai Municipal Corporation & Ors can be read here.

Commercial Legal Innovation

By Harry Moran | May 13, 2025

In January of this year, LFJ covered the launch of Legatus Holdings Limited, with the legal funding venture designed as a one-stop shop offering funding, legal services, insurance and claims acquisition under one umbrella organisation. Four months later, the insurance arm of this venture has launched its website and offered new insights into the legal risk services it will be offering.

In a post on Toremis Speciality’s website, CEO Nathan Hull introduced the new MGA business and provided an overview of its solutions and capabilities to the legal insurance market. Highlighting the company’s focus solely on legal related risks, Toremis will focus on delivering capabilities in after-the-Event (ATE), contingent risk, and tax liability insurance. Given Toremis’ ties to the other Legatus subsidiary companies (Asertis, KP Law, Cavis), Hull emphasised that the MGA also brings “strong, long-term capacity partners, that understand the space and are committed to its growth.”

Hull, whose involvement with Toremis was revealed at the time of the Legatus launch, brings a wealth of experience in legal insurance to his position as chief executive. Before taking on this new venture, Hull had spent the last five years as Head of Contingent and Litigation Risk Europe at VALE Insurance Partners.

Toremis’ website lists three executives in its senior leadership team, with Sam Tacey and Koosha Kowsari completing the trifecta alongside Hull. Tacey holds the position of Senior Partner, having joined the new venture from Acquinex where he served as Head of Contingent Risks and Claims. Kowsari is in post as the company’s Finance Director, building on a long career in finance and accounting, including his most recent role as Head of Insurance Finance at Marshmallow.

Public

Announcements Consumer

Legal-Bay Launches Innovative Attorney Case Cost Funding

By Harry Moran | May 13, 2025

Legal-Bay Pre-settlement Lawsuit Funding, a longtime leader in presettlement and legal funding, has unveiled a new financing program designed to help attorneys cover the high costs of building and preparing cases for trial without relying on bank loans or credit lines.

Case costs can include everything from medical records to expert witnesses to life care plans to court fees. Legal-Bay's funding lessens the upfront financial strain by providing capital that's only repaid if the lawsuit is successful, and gives legal professionals fast, flexible access to extra money when they need it most. The program allows attorneys to secure resources for experts, depositions, court filings, and other necessary expenses without tying up firm assets or tapping into their own expense accounts.

Chris Janish, CEO of Legal Bay, says, "Legal-Bay's attorney or law firm case cost funding program is tailored to help small and medium firms get the ball across the goal line to win big cases. We are a resource for lawyers nationwide to utilize case cost funding when cash flow is tight, without long underwriting processes, credit checks or monthly payments. Best of all, our non-recourse funding means you only pay if you win the case."

If you're a lawyer or law firm in need of extra case cost funding in advance of your case's anticipated settlement award, you can apply HERE or call: 877.571.0405

With nearly 20 years of experience in legal finance, Legal-Bay has earned the trust of thousands of attorneys and law firms across the country. The company's commitment to fast approvals, transparent terms, and case-first evaluations has made it a go-to resource for professionals seeking a smarter way to manage litigation costs.

Legal-Bay is one of the best legal funding companies in the industry, known for their helpful staff and quick turnaround. They fund almost every type of lawsuit including personal injury, slips and falls, sexual discrimination, assault, or abuse, motor vehicle accidents, wrongful incarceration, and more. While sometimes legal funding is referred to as loans on lawsuit or lawsuit loans, there are no credit checks or collateral required. The money is an immediate cash advance against a plaintiff's anticipated settlement award, not a conventional loan. The non-recourse lawsuit funding is risk-free, as the money doesn't need to be repaid should the recipient lose their case.

To apply right now, please visit the company's website HERE or call toll-free at: 877.571.0405 where agents are standing by to answer your questions.

Public

Announcements Commercial Deals

Alchemy Investments Acquisition Corp 1 Signs Non-Binding LOI with Cartiga, LLC

May 12, 2025

Alchemy Investments Acquisition Corp 1 ("Alchemy"( (Nasdaq: ALCY), a publicly traded special purpose acquisition company ("SPAC"), has entered into a non-binding letter of intent with Cartiga, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ("Cartiga" and together with Alchemy, the "Parties"), in connection with a potential business combination ("Business Combination").

Cartiga is a specialized alternative investment firm using advanced data analytics to drive investments in litigation finance. By integrating legal and financial data, Cartiga leverages proprietary information and deep domain expertise to predict litigation outcomes, optimize asset allocation and investment performance, and deliver case and business management insights to law firms.

Its analytics-driven strategy enables claim valuation, tech-enabled case monitoring, and dynamic risk adjustment. Cartiga streamlines the origination and investment process in a manner designed to mitigate risk and maximize returns. By investing in legal claims and legal services businesses, Cartiga continually improves its data advantage and value proposition to customers while delivering attractive non-correlated risk-adjusted returns⁽ⁱ⁾. Cartiga believes that it is optimally positioned to drive growth by leveraging direct distribution and machine learning tools to both accelerate originations and deploy business optimization tools for law firms.

As a public company, the pro forma business plans to opportunistically consolidate the fragmented litigation finance market through the intended acquisition and integration of complementary companies and assets. This strategy is designed to enhance scale, operational efficiency and market presence, driving long-term growth for shareholders.

Investment Highlights of Cartiga

Proven Track Record: More than $1.6 billion in lifetime originations and $1.6 billion in cash realizations since inception in 2000, demonstrating strong performance and profitability across market cycles.
Comprehensive Platform: A multi-product alternative asset management and direct origination platform investing in the U.S. litigation and legal services market.
Data-Driven Success: Advanced data analytics and bespoke technology enhance underwriting, risk assessment and portfolio management.
Large Addressable Market: Large $300 billion+ addressable market representing approximately 1.4% of US GDP with a limited number of scaled competitors and meaningfully underpenetrated by traditional capital providers.⁽ⁱⁱ⁾
Strategic Relationships: Longstanding partnerships with lawyers supported by 20-person in-house sales and business development team.
Robust Data Moat: Proprietary claims and outcomes database provides durable competitive differentiator.
Experienced Leadership: Led by seasoned, long-tenured professionals with domain expertise in the legal, finance and asset management industries.
Financial Strength: Profitable, well-capitalized, scalable business with diversified portfolio of non-correlated assets generating predictable shorter duration cash flows.
Institutional Backing: Supported by over $250 million in committed equity capital from blue chip investor base.

Other Key Metrics

Proprietary Database: Contains over 250,000 individual litigation-linked asset fundings diversified across 8,000+ unique lawyers and law firms
Investment Track Record: 20+ year track-record originating assets exhibiting non-correlated risk⁽ⁱⁱⁱ⁾ and outsized risk-adjusted returns versus traditional private credit^(iv)
IT and Product Development Investment: Over $20 million invested since 2020
Team Size: Approximately 95 employees
Structured Finance Expertise: Four rated securitization transactions completed – three have been fully realized.

Leadership Commentary

"We view Cartiga's platform as an attractive alternative investment, offering a return profile that is uncorrelated with other asset classes. This sector is massive and rapidly expanding," said Mr. Vittorio Savoia, Co-CEO of Alchemy.

Mr. Mattia Tomba, Co-CEO of Alchemy, added, "We believe Cartiga and Alchemy make a compelling partnership. As funding, disclosure, and regulatory standards evolve, we expect the interest for publicly traded litigation finance asset management companies to grow. We believe a Nasdaq listing will put Cartiga in a leadership position in the industry by enhancing transparency, reducing the cost of capital, and expanding access to flexible funding. "

Cartiga's CEO, Mr. Sam Wathen, remarked, "Combining with Alchemy aligns perfectly with our goals. Leveraging a Nasdaq listing would enable Cartiga to establish new industry guidelines with full transparency and utilize its public currency to drive growth and acquire complementary businesses. Enhanced transparency would ultimately lower funding costs, benefiting companies like ours."

About Cartiga, LLC

Cartiga is a specialized alternative investment firm that leverages advanced data analytics to drive decision-making in the litigation finance sector. Cartiga combines capital with proprietary technology to help law firms and their clients achieve better litigation outcomes. The company applies a data-driven approach to underwriting, risk assessment and portfolio management, utilizing proprietary data, structured and unstructured legal and financial information, and continuously updated datasets from ongoing capital deployment. This iterative process enhances Cartiga's predictive capabilities and strengthens its competitive edge.

Advisor to Cartiga, LLC

B. Riley Securities is acting as exclusive financial advisor to Cartiga, LLC.

About Alchemy Investments Acquisition Corp 1

Alchemy is a "special purpose acquisition company" or "SPAC," commonly known as a blank-check company, incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands as an exempted company for the purpose of completing a merger, share exchange, asset acquisition, share purchase, reorganization or similar business combination with one or more businesses, with a focus on companies acquiring, processing, analyzing, and utilizing data acquired from a variety of systems and sources.

Advisor to Alchemy Investments Acquisition Corp 1

Keefe, Bruyette and Woods, A Stifel Company, is acting as exclusive financial advisor to Alchemy Investments Acquisition Corp 1.

Important Information and Where To Find It

This press release is provided for information purposes only and contains information with respect to a potential Business Combination described herein. If the Parties enter into definitive documentation regarding a Business Combination, a newly formed holding company intends to file relevant materials with the SEC, including a Registration Statement on Form S-4, that includes a preliminary proxy statement/prospectus, and when available, a definitive proxy statement and final prospectus. Promptly after filing any definitive proxy statement with the SEC, Alchemy will mail the definitive proxy statement and a proxy card to each shareholder entitled to vote at the Extraordinary Meeting relating to the transaction. INVESTORS AND SHAREHOLDERS OF ALCHEMY ARE URGED TO READ THESE MATERIALS (INCLUDING ANY AMENDMENTS OR SUPPLEMENTS THERETO) AND ANY OTHER RELEVANT DOCUMENTS IN CONNECTION WITH THE TRANSACTION THAT ALCHEMY FILES WITH THE SEC IF AND WHEN THEY BECOME AVAILABLE BECAUSE THEY WILL CONTAIN IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT ALCHEMY, CARTIGA AND THE BUSINESS COMBINATION. Any definitive proxy statement, preliminary proxy statement and other relevant materials in connection with the transaction (if and when they become available), and any other documents filed by Alchemy with the SEC, may be obtained free of charge at the SEC's website (www.sec.gov).

Participants in the Solicitation

Alchemy and its directors and executive officers may be deemed participants in the solicitation of proxies from Alchemy's shareholders with respect to the Business Combination. A list of the names of those directors and executive officers and a description of their interests in Alchemy will be included in any proxy statement for the Business Combination and be available at www.sec.gov. Information about Alchemy's directors and executive officers and their ownership of ordinary shares is set forth in Alchemy's final prospectus, dated as of May 4, 2023, and filed with the SEC (File No. 333-68659) on May 5, 2023, as modified or supplemented by any Form 3 or Form 4 filed with the SEC since the date of such filing (the "Prospectus"). Additional information regarding the interests of the participants in the proxy solicitation will be included in the proxy statement pertaining to the proposed Business Combination when it becomes available. These documents can be obtained free of charge at the SEC's website (www.sec.gov).

Cartiga and its managers and executive officers may also be deemed to be participants in the solicitation of proxies from the shareholders of Alchemy in connection with the proposed Business Combination. A list of the names of such managers and executive officers and information regarding their interests in the proposed Business Combination will be included in any proxy statement for the proposed Business Combination when it becomes available.

Sources

ⁱ Source: As measured vs. US GDP published by the US Bureau of Economic Analysis, S&P 500 and the Merrill Lynch High Yield Bond Index performance

ⁱⁱ Source: GDP Figure based on the legal services market size as per the Beaureau of Economic Analysis. Underprenetration as measured based on the ratio of GDP contribution to US banking sector assets; US banking sector data as per the US Federal Reserve.

ⁱⁱⁱSource: As measured vs. US GDP published by the US Bureau of Economic Analysis, S&P 500 and the Merrill Lynch High Yield Bond Index performance

^ivBased on asset performance measured versus the Cliffwater Direct Lending Index (CDLI) for 12/31/2019 through 12/31/2024

Case Developments Commercial

By Harry Moran | May 12, 2025

A patent infringement case being brought against one of the world’s largest streaming companies would on its face be considered a significant matter. However, this case may have added implications for the world of litigation funding, as a judge has indicated that sanctions may be imposed on an attorney who shared sensitive information with the case’s funder.

Reporting by Bloomberg Law offers new insights into an ongoing patent lawsuit being brought against Netflix, as a federal judge looks set to impose sanctions on the plaintiff’s attorney for sharing the streaming service’s source code and company financial information with a litigation funder. The development came during a hearing in the US District Court for the Northern District of California, following Netflix’s complaint that attorney Bill Ramey shared information disclosure during discovery with AiPi LLC.

AiPi is the party that has funded the patent infringement case brought by Lauri Valjakka, a Finnish inventor who sued Netflix in 2022. AiPI Solutions’ website lists ‘IP Litigation Finance’ as one of the core services it offers to clients, which include corporate patent holders, law firms seeking alternative financing arrangements, and investors looking to invest in lawsuits.

Netflix’s complaint stems from allegations that Ramey shared information that was designated “attorneys eyes only” with AiPi, and that this information had been shared before Netflix had been informed of the funder’s involvement in the lawsuit. Sarah Piepmeier, an attorney at Perkins Coie representing Netflix, argued that having access to this sensitive company data “could influence their decisions to underwrite new cases or that could inspire them to bring new cases.”

Whilst Ramey tried to argue that the case’s protective order allowed for information to be shared with affiliates, and that the four lawyers at AiPi he had shared the information with fell under this designation, Judge Jon S. Tigar strongly disagreed with Ramey’s suggestion that this “is a situation of no harm”. Judge Tigar not only suggested that substantial “attorneys’ fees as a sanction are going to be appropriate”, he also said he was considering ordering Ramey to hand over any communications with the four individuals at AiPi. Furthermore, the judge indicated that he would be considering referring Ramey to a disciplinary body such as the California State Bar.