Trending Now

All Articles

3210 Articles

Bryant Park Capital Secures a $25 Million Senior Debt Facility for Fast Cash Legal, LLC

Bryant Park Capital (“BPC”), a leading middle market investment bank, announced today that Fast Cash Legal, LLC (“Fast Cash” or the “Company”) recently closed on a $25 million senior debt transaction with a leading institutional investor to the specialty  finance space. BPC served as the exclusive financial advisor to Fast Cash in connection with this transaction. “Bryant Park Capital was a valuable asset to our team throughout this process.  Their wealth of industry knowledge and experience proved crucial in representing Fast Cash Legal's interests and specific needs.  Litigation Finance is a unique product, and BPC's team exhibited the market expertise necessary for reaching a successful outcome.  Every step of the way they provided guidance, resources, and advice to ensure a smooth process.   We feel confident that we made the right choice having them on our team,” said Zamir Kazi, CEO of Fast Cash. About Fast Cash Legal, LLC Fast Cash was established in 2016 as an originator in consumer litigation finance, specializing in providing pre- and post-settlement legal funding to plaintiffs nationwide. In its early history, Fast Cash has already originated a successful and diversified portfolio across multiple states leveraging a team of professionals who have extensive operating experience in the sector. For more information about Fast Cash, please visit www.fastcashlegal.com.
Read More

Rise in Catastrophic Claims Causes Insurance Premiums to Skyrocket

The litigiousness of modern society cannot be denied. Now that so-called “nuclear” verdicts are more commonplace, insurance companies are raising premium prices to keep up. Dubbed “social inflation,” the ever-rising insurance costs are particularly impactful to property owners and real estate developers. Re Journals explains that there are steps that real estate owners and developers can take to mitigate rising prices and avoid costly legal action.   Some point to the growing practice of Litigation Finance as one possible cause for high judgments and increased litigation. While it’s true that third-party funding for legal claims can increase access to the court system—and therefore to justice itself—that does not indicate that the practice is in any way damaging. What can real estate owners, managers, or developers do in terms of best practices? Begin by adhering to safety mandates, and by adopting policies that encourage safe conduct and working conditions. Risk management can include preventative maintenance like keeping fire safety equipment up-to-date, being mindful of rain, ice, or snow, and ensuring that lighting and signage are visible and in working order. When third-party contractors are on your property, ensure that they are also following best practices. Vet contractors carefully, and verify their insurance before any work begins. If a contractor is uninsured or underinsured, liability could fall to the owner if anything untoward happens. If an accident or injury occurs, it’s vital to write down exactly what happened, take down statements from witnesses and ensure that the property is secure. Keeping your house in order is the best way to avoid costly litigation while keeping insurance premiums down.

Allianz: Five Liability Loss Trends for Businesses in the Face of the Coronavirus Pandemic

Liability exposures for companies around the world are increasing. Factors such as rising litigation, collective redress and large court verdicts, costly and frequent recalls in the automotive and food sectors, the disruptive impact of civil unrest and riots in a growing number of countries, and environmental concerns such as indoor air quality and higher fines and remediation standards will likely impact businesses and their insurers in the future – all in the face of a challenging global pandemic, according to a new report from Allianz Global Corporate & Specialty (AGCS) which highlights five trends for the sector. “Pricing in the liability insurance market may have turned in recent months, however social inflation trends and large court verdicts continue in the United States. This combined with expanded exposures for non-US companies doing business in the US and an increase in automotive part recalls are putting pressure on liability insurers,” says Ciara Brady, Global Head of Liability at AGCS. “Overlay this with the uncertain economic outlook, political instability and unknown impacts from coronavirus and this is creating a challenging market for clients, brokers and insurers alike. While we have to react to new loss trends in underwriting, AGCS remains committed to supporting our clients with solid risk transfer solutions and capacity to address today’s liability exposures.” Social inflation in the US and rise of collective redress globally Social inflation is a phenomenon especially prevalent in the US, driven by the growing emergence of litigation funders, higher jury awards, more liberal workers’ compensation claims, as well as new tort and negligence concepts. The median settlement amount of the top 50 US verdicts from 2014 to 2018 nearly doubled from $28mn to $54mn. Litigation funding is not only on the rise in the US, but also in Europe and elsewhere around the world, contributing to a growing trend of collective redress as hurdles for consumers are lowered to embark on class actions. Countries that may not be historically associated with this development, such as Saudi Arabia and South Africa, are classified as being “medium risk” that a company may face a collective action in these jurisdictions, according to AGCS’ litigation funding country guide. Another factor influencing the size of settlements in the US is the increasing sophistication of the plaintiff’s bar with specialist consultants and psychologists being deployed to influence the jury’s decision. The legal system in the US has seen a deterioration in consumer confidence towards corporations. This lack of confidence is driving an anger by individuals or classes of individuals toward perceived “greedy corporates” that is resulting in so-called “nuclear” verdicts. According to AGCS experts, it’s too early to identify a reverse trend, but court closures due to the Covid-19 pandemic may slow down social inflation as plaintiffs realize that it could take years before their case is tried before a jury and therefore may be more willing to settle outside court. Rising automotive repair and recall costs In recent years there has been a growing number of recalls in the automotive industry in both the US and Europe. In the US, there were 966 safety recalls affecting well over 50 million vehicles in 2019 – more than two every day. In many cases, components can be produced by one of a handful of suppliers that services the entire industry, which can make it prone to accumulation risks – as a result, recalls have become larger and more costly over time. For example, an airbag or an engine could be recalled due to a defect, affecting many companies and models. The increasing complexity of technology is another significant driver of industry losses, due to factors such as increased time and labor rates to make repairs, more specialized training for mechanics and other repairers, and the increasing price of parts. Costly food safety risks and recalls Food recalls are on the rise globally due to factors such as global manufacturing, fewer suppliers in complex supply chains, enhanced regulatory scrutiny, as well as improved technology which allows for better traceability and pathogen detection. Manufacturers need to recognize these factors and be diligent about who their suppliers are and conduct regular audits. The coronavirus pandemic could have a significant impact on – and pose special challenges for – food recalls in future: On one hand, hygiene standards have dramatically increased, which could reduce contamination risks which are a major cause of food and beverage recalls. On the other hand, with new operations, temporarily closed and restarted factories, remote workforces, decreases in regulatory visits and erratic supply chains, risk exposures could also swell moving forward. Riots and civil unrest threaten beyond physical damage The “yellow vest” protests in France, civil unrest in Chile, Hong Kong and Bolivia and most recently the racially-charged riots in the US are high-profile examples of the rise of civil unrest globally. Political violence increasingly causes property damage, disruption and loss of attraction and revenues to many businesses. For example, civil disorder in the wake of the death of George Floyd in many US cities is expected to have caused losses of more than $1bn. There are numerous insurance claims notified under strikes, riots and civil commotion or looting insurance coverages. According to AGCS experts, the coronavirus outbreak may have temporarily suppressed civil unrest in some countries, but the underlying social issues have not been solved, and further protests will likely occur in the near future. Indoor air quality after coronavirus Environmental pollution incidents can have damaging consequences for a business – two risks are particularly paramount: indoor air quality concerns with legionella and mold growth and, secondly the increasing risk of environmentally-driven prosecutions, fines and remedial actions, as public awareness for pollution and natural capital depletion grows. Mold and legionella risks have been exacerbated by the coronavirus shutdown of commercial buildings or hotels: When certain air quality systems or water installation systems are dormant for a while they are more susceptible to contamination by bacteria. On top of that, continued, undetected mold growth may result from real estate companies delaying planned maintenance or renovation activities. Major causes of liability claims and potential coronavirus impacts The report also analyzes some of the major causes of insurance industry liability claims over the past five years – defective product incidents account for half of the value of all claims –and looks at how the coronavirus outbreak is already impacting the insurance sector. With more people staying at home through the pandemic, and with the temporary closure of many shops, airports and businesses, notifications of slip and fall incidents, which are one of the major causes of liability claims, have slowed. However, the market could see claims brought by third-parties for injury or property damage due to failure to adequately protect against the coronavirus, as well as employee action against employers who did not appropriately protect them. Product liability and recall claims tend to follow economic activity, so there could be an impact in these areas with the economic downturn. Meanwhile, restarting production after periods of hibernation may give rise to human error incidents. About Allianz Global Corporate & Specialty SE Allianz Global Corporate & Specialty (AGCS) SE is a leading global corporate insurance carrier and a key business unit of Allianz Group. We provide risk consultancyProperty-Casualty insurance solutions and alternative risk transfer for a wide spectrum of commercial, corporate and specialty risks across 10 dedicated lines of business. Our customers are as diverse as business can be, ranging from Fortune Global 500 companies to small businesses, and private individuals. Among them are not only the world’s largest consumer brands, tech companies and the global aviation and shipping industry, but also wineries, satellite operators or Hollywood film productions. They all look to AGCS for smart answers to their largest and most complex risks in a dynamic, multinational business environment and trust us to deliver an outstanding claims experience. Worldwide, AGCS operates with its own teams in 32 countries and through the Allianz Group network and partners in over 200 countries and territories, employing over 4,450 people. As one of the largest Property-Casualty units of Allianz Group, we are backed by strong and stable financial ratings. In 2019, AGCS generated a total of €9.1 billion gross premium globally. www.agcs.allianz.com
Read More
The LFJ Podcast
Hosted By Kevin Flood |
In this episode, Kevin Flood, COO of Segue Cloud Services, returns to the podcast to discuss Segue's 3.0 upgrade (see the recent press release). Kevin explains how Segue's cloud-based technology automates workflows and reduces operating costs, the specific enhancements of the 3.0 upgrade, how customer data is protected, and how the company accommodates client needs during the lockdown. [podcast_episode episode="6277" content="title,player,details"]

Segue Cloud Services Introduces Segue 3.0 Platform

Segue Cloud Services, a division of Woodstock Capital Holdings, has released its Segue 3.0 platform, a cloud-based platform which  combines all pre-settlement funding workflows and processes, data recovery, and digitized document management features. Segue is a leading provider of cloud-based management tools for the legal and specialty finance community. It has served litigation finance companies and law offices around the country since 2010. The Segue 3.0 platform offers several new and enhanced features that will help customers expedite processing, streamline workflows, and reduce operating costs. Recent upgrades include integrations with Intuit’s QuickBooks platform and OwnBackup, a recognized data recovery and security provider that ensures all case data is securely stored in the cloud. In addition, Segue has enhanced its reporting and analytics capabilities, determines profitability by organizational role as well as clients and law firms, and supports flexible fees. Segue technology enables pre-settlement funding companies to manage their entire business —from intake to settlement—through an intuitive, browser-based interface. Through this technology, litigation finance companies can manage workflows, intake forms, track funding, notify stakeholders, and run reports, from any location. Segue’s 3.0 platform is accessible from any mobile device, facilitating pre-settlement funding during work-from-home and social distancing mandates. The platform instantly digitizes and automates documents, populates signatures, delivers alerts and account status updates to stakeholders, and provides real-time reporting. It reduces much of the labor and human error associated in manual tracking of the often-burdensome pre-settlement funding process. Through this solution, Segue can help litigation finance firms place funds into the hands of plaintiffs and attorneys in as little as 24 hours, providing financial security during the pre-settlement period. Segue 3.0 is also capable of tracking medical receivables. The platform’s tight integration with Salesforce enables customers to retrieve all Segue tools and features directly from the Salesforce portal, allowing the organization an efficient method to access case information and leverage advanced analytics and reporting capabilities from any device, anywhere in the world. Segue has also extended its relationship with document management leader Conga, giving lenders and law firms the ability to manage all document management tasks from the cloud, simplifying business processes and accelerating time to funding. These features let Segue automate company notifications, contracts, pay-off letters, and electronic signatures. “Segue has built a loyal following in the pre-settlement community not just for our technology’s  reliability and efficiency, but for our ability to automate the labor-intensive, cumbersome tasks that have been associated with pre-settlement funding,” said Kevin Flood, Segue’s chief operating officer. “The introduction of our Segue 3.0 platform represents a quantum leap forward for our customers. “By creating a new partnership with Intuit and Own Backup, as well as strengthening existing ties with Salesforce and Conga, we have added compelling new capabilities and features that make our platform more secure, resilient, and functional. We anticipate that both existing and new clients will be very satisfied with the myriad benefits they receive from this compelling platform.” For additional information, please visit www.seguecloudservices.com,
Read More

Avenue 33 LLC Founder Rebecca Berrebi on Litigation Funding Consulting

Some would say that the quickest way to be successful in business is to identify a need in the market—then find a way to fill that need. One person who took that advice to heart is Rebecca Berrebi, founder of a litigation funding consultancy firm that just opened. Above the Law details that Berrebi’s company, Avenue 33 LLC, provides expertise on legal finance to firms, investors, litigants, and others. The company advises on how to get maximum value in any litigation funding situation including case management, monetization, deal structuring, and enforcement. Berrebi uses her years of experience in the business and legal world to provide valuable guidance to her clients. When asked about her high level of optimism for the Litigation Finance industry, Berrebi had a lot to say. Her experience in Big Law and with litigation funding has given her a unique perspective on the issues facing funders today. The three stakeholders in any funding situation, the firm, the litigant, and the investors, may all have different motives, but must pool resources and expertise to reach a common goal.   Sadly, not all of Berrebi’s experiences with litigation funding were positive—some were learning experiences. When parties come into a case without a full understanding of all that litigation funding can do, the results can be contentious, involving wasted time and resources. With that in mind, Berrebi’s optimism comes from a place of knowledge and experience, having successfully navigated choppy legal waters in the past. Avenue 33 is exactly the sort of service potential litigants should look into when considering the use of litigation funding. A neutral party that can offer advice without having a stake in the proceedings is likely to benefit anyone needing to make an informed decision.

Funding Insolvency Claims in Australia

Australia’s Litigation Finance community is in a state of flux, as new regulations are implemented, and industry players scramble to remain in compliance. Understanding litigation funding for companies in liquidation is essential in order to reap maximum benefits. Mondaq explains that if adequate funds for liquidation are not available, liquidators are in no way obligated to litigate. While it makes sense that liquidators will make every effort to widen the asset pool to distribute to creditors, inadequate funds can make that impossible. That’s where Litigation Finance can come into play. In Australia, third-party funding for liquidations has been available since 1996. The practice is also mentioned in the Corporations Act of 2001, where it affirms that funders may enhance available funds for distribution to afford unsecured creditors a larger payout. It costs money to bring proceedings against company directors and others, yet not doing so only works to the detriment of creditors. With that in mind, it makes sense for liquidators to make use of third-party funding. Of course, Litigation Finance in insolvency cases is complex and brings with it some caveats. Courts have expressed concerns over funding arrangements, potential conflicts of interest, and even the idea that funding will bring about more lawsuits—some of which might have insufficient merits. This concern eventually brought about a mandate that agreements between funders and liquidators will require approval from the court. When courts vet funding agreements, they first look at control. Ideally, liquidators will retain total control and will be the ones who provide updates and instructions to the lawyers involved. Meanwhile, funders have little if any control—though they do retain the right to end their funding agreement at any time. This is part of the nature of non-recourse funding. Currently, Litigation Finance is a positive force in the world of insolvency.

Burford CEO Chris Bogart Discusses Launch of International Legal Finance Association

The launch of the International Legal Finance Association (ILFA) is a first-of-its-kind event. Burford Capital is the force behind this global organization, fueled by the exciting industry growth that has taken place in recent years. What can we expect from this newly formed entity? Burford Capital details that the mission of the ILFA is twofold. First, it will focus on ensuring that industry concerns are heard by the powers that be. Courts, lawmakers, and clients will all benefit from hearing directly from industry professionals. Next, the ILFA will be an ever-growing resource of information about the industry. This aspect promises to be of particular use for corporate and private clients who may not yet understand the finer points of financing litigation. Some might ask why a global entity is necessary, when Litigation Finance is a robust and growing industry. Advocacy for the industry is of paramount importance, especially as it develops and adapts to changing circumstances. Chris Bogart explains that launching the ILFA is an expected step in the evolution of the industry—one that inches Litigation Finance ever closer to a financial service provider, rather than a niche business. Bogart feels strongly that the launch of the ILFA won’t change views on the industry itself. However, it does seem to predict further growth. Trade associations are common in many fields, and they don’t tend to alter public perception much. But such groups can have an impact by advocating for members—which is the primary focus of the ILFA.

Litigation Funders Form Global Trade Organization

Editor's note: An earlier version of this article omitted Longford Capital as a founding member of the ILFA. That omission has been resolved. We regret the error.  At least six of the world’s most successful litigation finance entities are forming a global coalition called the International Legal Finance Association, or ILFA. Founding members include Burford Capital, Longford Capital, Omni Bridgeway, Therium Capital Management, Harbour Litigation Funding, and Woodsford Litigation Funding. Also joining the association are Parabellum Capital, DE Shaw & Co, Nivalon AG, Fortress Investment Group, and Validity Finance. Bloomberg Law reports that the six founding firms have, in total, deployed over $5 billion into investments. Investors are still flocking to the industry, largely because legal finance is not tied to the rest of the investor marketplace. Defending against excessive regulation is critical, because whether it’s effective or not—once enacted, new regulations often catch on elsewhere in the world. Because the founding funders of the ILFA operate all over the world, they have to be aware of laws and regulations across the globe.