Trending Now

All Articles

3453 Articles

Renovus Capital Partners Announces Majority Investment in Angeion Group

By Harry Moran |

Renovus Capital Partners ("Renovus"), a private equity firm based in the Philadelphia area, announced today that it has acquired a majority stake in class action case management solutions provider Angeion Group, LLC ("Angeion"). Founder & Chief Executive Officer, Steven Weisbrot, and senior members of the management team have maintained a significant ownership stake in the Company and will continue to drive the growth of the platform in partnership with Renovus. Marks Baughan Securities LLC served as the exclusive financial advisor to Angeion Group in the transaction.

Angeion, which is also headquartered in Philadelphia, is the leading innovator in the class action settlement industry. As a global provider of notice and claims administration services, the company has built a technology platform that enables its legal experts to manage the largest and most complex class action settlements.

The Renovus partnership will enable Angeion to accelerate the buildout of its management, client service, and delivery teams and increase investment in its proprietary class action technology solutions. Angeion plans to grow its leadership position in the US market and continue to develop its international business through a combination of key hires, new solutions, and strategic acquisitions.

Angeion was founded in 2013 by Steve Weisbrot, Esq. and Christopher Chimicles, with a mission to modernize the class action settlements industry. With over 160 team members, the Company provides high-quality service and innovative technology solutions in settlement administration, adapting to the constantly evolving legal services ecosystem. To date, its team has managed more than 2,000 class action settlements and distributed over $10 billion to class members.

"This partnership marks a major milestone in Angeion's growth journey," said Weisbrot. "The investment from Renovus is a testament to the dynamic team that has propelled Angeion into the great company that it is today and that will continue to drive its growth into the future. I am extremely proud of what we have accomplished, and I am even more energized for the years ahead."

"Angeion is one of the most differentiated and fastest growing players in class action services," said Renovus Managing Director Lee Minkoff. "Renovus has a track record of identifying unique tech-enabled legal services companies, aligning with management on a growth thesis, and making investments to execute that thesis. This is the exact opportunity we have with Angeion, and we could not be more excited to partner with Steve and the management team."

Marks Baughan served as exclusive financial advisor to Angeion Group.

About Angeion Group

Angeion Group stands at the forefront of settlement administration and legal noticing services. Leveraging advanced technology, proven best practices, and expert consulting, Angeion specializes in managing class actions and other types of mass litigation. Angeion's dedication to efficiency, accountability, and excellence instills confidence in counsel and the court alike. 

About Renovus Capital PartnersFounded in 2010, Renovus Capital Partners is a lower middle-market private equity firm specializing in the Knowledge and Talent industries. From its base in the Philadelphia area, Renovus manages over $2 billion of assets across its several sector focused funds. The firm's current portfolio includes over 30 U.S. based businesses specializing in education and workforce development and services companies in the technology, healthcare and professional services markets. Renovus typically makes control buyout investments in founder owned businesses, leveraging its industry expertise and operator network to make operational improvements, recruit top talent and pursue add-on acquisitions. Visit us at www.renovuscapital.com and follow us on LinkedIn.

GreenX Metals Awarded £252M in Compensation in Arbitration Claims Funded by LCM

By Harry Moran |

Disputes between companies involved in mining operations continue to represent valuable opportunities for litigation funders, with bilateral investment treaties offering avenues for these corporations to seek compensation from nation states.

An announcement from GreenX Metals Limited revealed that the company has reached a successful outcome in its arbitration claims against the Republic of Poland, and has been awarded two substantial sums of compensation by the tribunal. The claims were brought against Poland under the Australia-Poland Bilateral Investment Treaty (BIT) and the Energy Charter Treaty (ECT), with GreenX arguing that the Polish government had breached its obligations under the treaties in relation to the Jan Karski mining project. 

The tribunal awarded GreenX £252 million under the BIT and a further £183 million in compensation under the ECT. However, GreenX also revealed that the tribunal did not uphold the company’s claim in relation to the Dębieńsko project. The tribunal’s ruling on these claims are also final and binding, with no provision for an appeal procedure, in accordance with the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law Rules (UNCITRAL).

As part of the announcement, GreenX highlighted that the claims had been financially supported by Litigation Capital Management (LCM), referring to the company’s July 2020 announcement that it had secured an A$18 million funding facility to pursue the arbitration. GreenX noted that whilst the tribunal has ordered each party to cover their own legal costs, all of GreenX’s costs have already been covered by the funding from LCM.

Community Spotlights

Community Spotlight: Phil Goter, Partner, Intellectual Property Group, Barnes & Thornburg

By John Freund |

Clients trust Phillip Goter to enforce and manage their valuable intellectual property. Phil counsels organizations – ranging from startups to Fortune 100 companies – around the world, managing litigation through trial and appeal, thoughtfully obtaining patents and trademarks, conducting pre-suit investigations, advising on regulatory issues, conducting due diligence and freedom to operate analyses, and resolving complex disputes.

Phil leverages his business and industry experience when working with his clients, and they value his strategic thinking and trust his counsel regarding IP strategies that protect R&D investment and product markets.

Phil, who practices in the firm’s Minneapolis office, frequently works with high-tech clients in the computer software and hardware space. His keen familiarity with computer hardware, standards-essential cellular infrastructure, 5G, GPS, mobile apps, autonomous vehicles, artificial intelligence, machine learning, computer and network security, VoIP, wireless networking, home automation, medical devices, and cloud computing aid him in providing successful outcomes for his clients.

He has deep experience providing counsel to international businesses on U.S. intellectual property matters, including representing European and Asian consumer electronics, networking and telecommunications, and pharmaceutical companies in global IP disputes. His practice includes patent litigation in U.S. district courts around the country and before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, with the majority in key patent litigation venues such as Texas, Delaware, and California.

Phil also has significant experience with complex economic matters and his cases have included competition law issues, such as monopolization, attempted monopolization, and Walker Process and sham litigation claims. He has successfully obtained lost profits verdicts in pharmaceutical cases and has commissioned and used numerous expert surveys in litigation to prove infringement, indirect infringement, rates of infringement, apportionment, lost profits, and value of the invention.

He also has in-house counsel experience. Prior to joining Barnes & Thornburg, Phil was an investment manager and legal counsel for a global, publicly traded litigation finance and legal risk management company. He advanced the company’s IP initiatives globally and handled U.S. litigation matters through the entire life cycle of the litigation funding relationship, including sourcing, evaluating, and monitoring IP and commercial investments through to resolution.

Outside of his legal practice, Phil teaches intellectual property at the University of Minnesota Law School and can often be found at the hockey rink, coaching his three children’s youth hockey teams.

Company Name and Description: With more than 800 attorneys and other legal professionals, Barnes & Thornburg is one of the largest law firms in the country. We serve clients worldwide from offices in Atlanta, Boston, California, Chicago, Delaware, Indiana, Michigan, Minneapolis, Nashville, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Philadelphia, Raleigh, Salt Lake City, South Florida, Texas and Washington, D.C. We provide guidance in more than 50 dedicated practice areas, including litigation, intellectual property, labor and employment and corporate law. We are where you need us. Find out more at btlaw.com.

Company Website: btlaw.com

Year Founded: 1982

Headquarters: Largest office is in Indianapolis

Area of Focus: Intellectual property

Member Quote: Litigation finance has become an increasingly important financial tool for IP owners, who often find themselves disadvantaged by large, well-capitalized competitors. In this lopsided dynamic, non-recourse capital from trusted legal funders gives me the ability to right the harms inflicted upon my clients.

Litigation Capital Management Limited Positive Update on Fund I Investment

By Harry Moran |

Litigation Capital Management Limited (AIM:LIT), an alternative asset manager specialising in dispute financing solutions internationally, announces a positive development on an investment within its Fund I portfolio.

LCM has funded a claim advanced in respect of an international arbitration claim brought against the Republic of Poland under the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) Rules. The Tribunal has unanimously held in favour of the funded party that the Republic of Poland breached its obligations under the Australia-Poland Bilateral Investment Treaty and the Energy Charter Treaty.  

The quantum of the award entered in favour of LCM's funded party totals A$490 million plus interest.

LCM's funded party has therefore been successful in the claim. If the award is not subject to challenge and is not satisfied the dispute will move to an enforcement stage. We will assess any further funding requirements once the enforcement strategy has been finalised.

The total investment into the case to date is A$16.6 million (US$11.3 million). This investment comprises A$4.2 million (US$2.8 million) from LCM’s own balance sheet and A$12.4 million (US$8.5 million) of third party capital from Fund I. In line with our usual practice LCM's returns are calculated as a rising multiple of invested capital over time.  

This investment is no longer attended with liability and quantum risk as that has been decided. Final performance will be announced to the market after conclusion of the investment. However, if the award is satisfied within a reasonable period without the need for enforcement, then based upon the contractual terms with the funded party as at the date of this announcement, LCM would be entitled to a multiple of 6 times its own invested capital plus significant performance fees on third party capital invested. 

Patrick Moloney, CEO of LCM, commented: "This announcement represents a very significant milestone in this investment. Subject to any challenge to the very favourable and unanimous award we now move to an enforcement stage. This investment is part of Fund I and therefore stands to benefit from significant performance fees giving it the potential to be the most successful investment in LCM’s history."

About LCM

Litigation Capital Management (LCM) is an alternative asset manager specialising in disputes financing solutions internationally, which operates two business models. The first is direct investments made from LCM's permanent balance sheet capital and the second is third party fund management. Under those two business models, LCM currently pursues three investment strategies: Single-case funding, Portfolio funding and Acquisitions of claims. LCM generates its income from both its direct investments and also performance fees through asset management.

LCM has an unparalleled track record driven by disciplined project selection and robust risk management. Currently headquartered in Sydney, with offices in London, Singapore, Brisbane and Melbourne, LCM listed on AIM in December 2018, trading under the ticker LIT.

www.lcmfinance.com

Tactical Management Announces Acquisition of Avyana Litigation Funding

By Harry Moran |

An investment vehicle advised by Tactical Management has successfully acquired Avyana Litigation Funding, further expanding its strategic portfolio in the legal financing sector.

Tactical Management, a globally active turnaround investor, specializes in unlocking the potential of underperforming companies, distressed real estate, and non-performing loans. The firm’s expertise lies in driving value and growth through strategic and operational support across a range of sectors and asset types.

Avyana Litigation Funding is dedicated to democratizing justice by providing financial support for complex legal disputes. As a trusted partner to minority shareholders, investors, and businesses, Avyana not only funds their fight to pursue rightful claims but also helps them monetize these claims, turning legal challenges into financial opportunities.

The acquisition aligns with Tactical Management’s strategic focus on supporting businesses with high-growth potential through innovative solutions. The acquisition of Avyana allows Tactical Management to strengthen its presence in the legal financing market, offering comprehensive services such as:

  • Shareholder Disputes: Funding legal battles over shareholder rights, corporate governance, and mismanagement.
  • Investor Claims: Supporting claims related to corporate misconduct, fraud, or breach of fiduciary duty.
  • Bankruptcy Litigation: Financing litigation to recover debts or protect interests during bankruptcy proceedings.
  • Individual or Collective Legal Actions: Providing funding for both individual and group legal actions.

Through this acquisition, Tactical Management enhances its ability to generate value for investors and stakeholders by tapping into the rapidly growing litigation funding market.

Chris Dore Joins Bridge Legal as Managing Director, Strategic Opportunities

By Harry Moran |

Bridge Legal, a leading provider of AI legal workflows, data management, and predictive analytics solutions for litigation funders and the high-volume law firms they support, is pleased to announce the appointment of Chris Dore as Managing Director, Strategic Opportunities.

With over 15 years of experience as a litigator and litigation funder specializing in mass torts, single-event, and class-action matters, Chris brings a wealth of expertise to Bridge Legal. Prior to joining the company, he served as a Partner at Edelson PC, a nationally recognized mass tort and class-action law firm, and most recently as a Director at Burford Capital, the world's largest litigation funder.

In his new role, Chris will focus on expanding and managing Bridge Legal's capital market strategies in high-volume consumer litigation. He will leverage the company's industry leading marketing, intake, case maturation, and AI-driven software platform—Bridgify—to strengthen relationships within the mass tort, mass arbitration, and single-event space. His efforts aim to enhance the sophistication of services offered to Bridge Legal's law firm and litigation funder clients, providing them with the tools and resources necessary to thrive amidst increasing data complexity and operational risk.

"Bridgify's AI workflow capabilities are transforming the way litigation funders and law firms operate by providing unprecedented visibility over their investments and case portfolios," said Ed Scanlan, Founder & CEO of Bridge Legal. "We are thrilled to welcome Chris to our leadership team. His extensive experience in mass torts and litigation funding aligns perfectly with our strategic vision. With his leadership, we aim to further enhance Bridgify's AI-driven solutions to meet the evolving needs of litigation funders and the firms they support. Chris's role will be pivotal in deepening our relationships within the industry and elevating the services we provide."

"I'm excited to join the leading legal tech company in the industry," said Chris. "Bridgify represents the future of high-volume legal services and litigation funding by integrating AI to streamline and enhance every facet of investment and case management. By focusing on expanding capital investments in high-volume consumer litigation and leveraging Bridge Legal's innovative platforms, we can provide unparalleled value to our clients. I look forward to contributing to Bridge Legal's mission of increasing human access to justice and helping to lead the company into its next chapter."

About Bridge Legal

Bridge Legal is the leading provider of AI workflow and predictive analytics solutions for litigation funders and the law firms they support. From its Chicago office, the company also offers marketing and intake services to help firms build their dockets, as well as back-office support for rapid case prove-up, including Plaintiff Fact Sheets and medical record reviews. Combined with its flagship platform, Bridgify—which includes data management and normalization, AI-driven workflow automation, integration management, predictive analytics, client communication and asset monitoring and fund management—this provides a game-changing, flexible offering unmatched in the industry. By integrating advanced technology with industry expertise, Bridge Legal empowers its clients to streamline operations, enhance client services, and drive profitable growth in an increasingly complex legal landscape.

Rep. Issa Introduces Litigation Funding Disclosure Bill

By Harry Moran |

Whilst it has mostly been at the state level where we have seen progress on legislation designed to increase transparency and disclosure around third-party litigation funding, this now looks set to change with the introduction of a new bill to Congress.

An article in Bloomberg Law covers the news that Republican congressman Darrell Issa has introduced a new bill to the House of Representatives, seeking to enshrine litigation funding disclosure into federal law. H.R.9922 was introduced last Friday, with the bill’s title signalling Rep. Issa’s intention “to amend title 28, United States Code, to provide for transparency and oversight of third-party beneficiaries in civil actions.” According to Bloomberg’s reporting, the bill would require both the disclosure of the identity of any litigation funder and the disclosure of the funding agreement present in a civil lawsuit.

Rep. Issa said that the proposed legislation “targets serious and continuing abuses in our litigation system and achieves a standard of transparency that people deserve and our standard of law requires.” Issa argued that the existence of litigation funding in a case should always be disclose, because “when we achieve a lasting measure of awareness by all parties, it will advance fair and equal treatment by the justice system and deter bad actors from exploiting our courts.”

Rep. Scott Fitzgerald is also listed as a co-sponsor for the bill.

H.R.9922 can be tracked here, although the full text of the bill is not yet available. 

Free Conference on Recent Legislative Responses to Litigation Finance

By Harry Moran |

The Center on Civil Justice at New York University School of Law mission is dedicated to the U.S. civil justice system and the continued fulfillment of its purpose. The Center brings together the unmatched strengths of the NYU Law faculty in the fields of procedure and complex litigation with the sophisticated practitioners and judges who make up our Board of Advisers.  Together we endeavor to support our civil courts as a place for people to fairly and efficiently resolve their problems and access justice.

The Center on Civil Justice at NYU School of Law will host a one-day conference on October 28, 2024 on the subject of legislative efforts to regulate third-party legal funding with the goal of connecting the debates on key legal funding issues taking place in academia and among practitioners, lobbyists and legislators, in the US and in Europe.  

The conference will consist of three panels, each focusing on a different legal funding reform effort. These include U.S. legislative efforts to regulate commercial litigation financing and consumer legal funding, in addition to an examination of European and other international legislative attempts to regulate third-party funding. The bill sponsors will be invited to present, along with experts on the topics the bill covers.

The event will take place on October 28, 2024, from 9am - 3:30pm.  We encourage everyone to attend in-person at Greenberg Lounge of Vanderbilt Hall, 40 Washington Square South, NY, NY 10012.

For those who cannot do so, the event will also be livestreamed via Zoom.  A link will be sent out to everyone who RSVPs.

The event is free, and we will be applying for CLE credit. 

Register Here: https://forms.gle/Z5UuQcB2geNhRe7dA.

9:15 AM – 9:30 AM – Opening Remarks

9:30 AM – 11:00 AM - Panel 1: Disclosure of Commercial Litigation Financing Agreements

While much of the state legislation enacted on third-party litigation finance has focused on consumer legal funding, states and the federal government have begun to think about the regulation of commercial litigation funding as well.  Specifically, the issue of whether, under what circumstances, and to what extent to disclose commercial third-party funding has been one of the most significant policy questions facing the industry for years.   Legislation has been introduced or passed in West Virginia, Wisconsin, and US Congress regarding disclosure of commercial funding agreements, and we will discuss these bills and others and how they will impact the commercial funding landscape.

11:15 AM – 12:45 PM – Panel 2: New York A.115 - Consumer Funding

Much, if not most, state legislation focuses specifically on consumer legal funding and not commercial litigation financing.  New York State alone has five different such bills.  This panel chooses to focus on A.115, which has passed the New York State Senate but not the Assembly – the bill that has so far advanced the furthest.  This bill caps returns to funders at the military lending rate.  Other bills do not place such a cap at all but require full disclosure of the contract.  This panel will discuss what is the best way forward to regulate the product in New York and across the country.

12:45 PM – 1:30 PM – Lunch

1:30 PM – 3:00 PM – Panel 3: EU P9_TA (2022) 0308 - International Legislation

In 2022, the EU Parliament adopted a resolution to introduce legislation creating minimum standards for third-party funding in the EU.  The European Commission has yet to submit a formal proposal for the EU Parliament and European Commission to consider.  However, the principals outlined in the resolution highlight many significant discussion points within the industry and demonstrate the state of international regulation of the industry.

3:00 PM – 3:15 PM – Closing Remarks

RSVP for the event here: https://forms.gle/Z5UuQcB2geNhRe7dA.

Government Must Protect Litigation Funding That Helped Sub-Postmasters, Say Consumer Champions and Small Businesses  

By Harry Moran |

Consumer champions and small businesses have called on the Government to introduce urgent legislation to protect the funding mechanism that helped Alan Bates expose the Post Office.

Litigation funding is currently supporting the equal pay claims of 100,000 female supermarket workers, rugby players facing life-changing injuries, and billpayers claiming water companies lied about dumping raw sewage in the UK’s waterways. Funders provide financial backing for cases in exchange for an agreed share of the proceeds.

But since a 2023 Supreme Court ruling in PACCAR which sent shockwaves through the sector, uncertainty has impacted claimants and funders. Defendants have mounted a series of legal challenges to funding arrangements with Apple, Sony and Mastercard all set to challenge current funding models in the Court of Appeal next year. Additionally, there was a 75% slowdown in cases funded in the second half of last year, according to Exton Advisors which is an independent specialist adviser to claimants, funders and law firms.

In an open letter to the Government, class representatives for millions of consumers and the truck hauliers involved in the original PACCAR claim against a price-fixing cartel, said the PACCAR ruling “jeopardises past, present and future funding agreements, and is threatening access to justice for individuals and businesses”.

bill to fix the issue had won cross-party support in the previous Parliament, but had not passed into law before Parliament was dissolved. The new Government has said it will not review the need for legislation until late next year.  

Signatories of the open letter said: “While there has previously been cross-party support for a simple and speedy legislative fix, the Government is dragging its heels on addressing the issue. Until this issue is resolved, uncertainty for claimants will persist.  

“We call on the Prime Minister - who spent his legal career securing justice for those who needed it - to urgently introduce a simple legal fix to ensure David can afford to take on Goliath and access to justice is preserved for those seeking to protect their basic rights.”

Neil Purslow, chairman of the International Legal Finance Association and chief investment officer at funder Therium which backed the sub-postmasters’ case, said:

“Litigation funding provides a narrow route to justice for businesses and individuals - many of whom are trying to protect their basic rights.

“We hope the Government hears these concerns, understands the real impact this is having on claimants and brings forward an urgent fix so people like the sub-postmasters can continue to access and secure justice in the future.”

Notes

Professor Carolyn Roberts vs Thames Water, Severn Trent, Anglian Water and Others

  •  A collective action against six UK water companies for alleged overcharging due to underreporting of sewage pollution incidents between 2017-2020.

Alex Neill, Class Representative, vs Sony Playstation

  • A £5bn collective action alleging Sony abused its dominant position by imposing unfair terms on PlayStation game developers, resulting in excessive prices for consumers.

Nikki Stopford, Class Representative, vs Google and Others

  • A £7bn collective action alleging Google abused its dominant position in the search engine market, resulting in inflated advertising costs and higher prices for consumers.

Clare Spottiswoode, Class Representative, vs Nexans France SAS & Others

  • A collective action alleging that cable manufacturers' cartel activities led to inflated domestic electricity prices in Great Britain. 

Richard Smith, Chairman of Road Hauliers Association, vs PACCAR and Others

  • A £2bn opt-in class action against major truck manufacturers for their involvement in a price-fixing cartel that allegedly inflated vehicle prices between 1997 and 2011.

Open letter from claimants and class reps

Over the years, litigation funding has helped to remedy some of the worst miscarriages of justice in legal history. It has levelled the playing field for individuals and small businesses, as well as exposing corporate wrongdoing on a colossal scale - from the Post Office Horizon scandal to Dieselgate. 

Today the sector is financially backing attempts to secure people’s basic rights — supporting equal pay claims for over 100,000 women, helping sportspeople receive compensation for life-changing injuries, and holding water companies to account for dumping sewage in our waterways.

But the recent Supreme Court’s PACCAR ruling now jeopardizes past, present and future funding agreements, and is threatening access to justice for individuals and businesses. 

While there has previously been cross-party support for a simple and speedy legislative fix, the Government is dragging its heels on addressing the issue. Until that fix is put in place, uncertainty for claimants will persist.  

We call on the Prime Minister - who spent his legal career securing justice for those who needed it - to urgently introduce a simple legal fix to ensure David can afford to take on Goliath and access to justice is preserved for those seeking to protect their basic rights.

Signed

Richard Smith, Chairman of Road Hauliers Association, vs PACCAR and Others
Professor Carolyn Roberts vs Thames Water, Severn Trent, Anglian Water and Others
Alex Neill, Class Representative, vs Sony Playstation
Nikki Stopford, Class Representative, vs Google and Others
Clare Spottiswoode, Class Representative, vs Nexans France SAS & Others