Manolete (AIM:MANO), the leading UK-listed insolvency litigation financing company, today announces its audited results for the year ended 31 March 2024. 

Steven Cooklin, Chief Executive Officer, commented: 

"These annual results show that Manolete has now recovered strongly from the UK Government's suppression of the UK insolvency sector that prevailed during the Covid period. The Company has returned to profitability and has continued its track record of consistent operational cash generation. That has been driven by a record number of 251 case completions in FY24.

The trading results for the new financial year, which commenced on 1 April 2024, clearly show that this positive momentum has continued: year to date, new case enquiries are running 22% ahead of FY24 and our in-house legal team has already completed 116 cases with an aggregate value of £11.8m (compared to this stage last year, where we had completed 93 cases for a total value of £6.3m). This is also reflected in our gross cash receipts where we have already collected £10.3m in the first five months of this financial year, compared to £8.7m for the whole six-month, first half period of the previous financial year.

"Widely reported, challenging, multiple, macro-economic factors including: high interest rates, persistent inflationary threats, stretched Government balance sheets and global conflicts, provide strong tailwinds and significant momentum for further growth. As the clear market leader in the UK insolvency litigation finance sector, the Company is exceptionally well positioned to take advantage of these conditions". 

Financial (statutory and non-statutory) highlights: 

• Realised revenues on completed cases were £24.2m, a decrease of 10% (FY23: £26.8m) although FY23 included an exceptionally large, funded case completion of which £4.9m was recorded in realised revenue (total settlement £9.5m).
• Adjusting for that single exceptional case, FY24 realised revenues were 11% higher than FY23. 
• 92% of total revenues represented by realised revenues on fully completed cases (FY23: 129%). 
• Increase in the valuation of the cartel cases contributed £0.1m to gross profit in FY24 (FY23: £1.2m). 
• EBIT increased to £2.5m, which represented a positive change from an EBIT loss of £3.1m in the prior year. 
• Gross cash receipts from completed cases were £17.7m, a decrease of 34% (FY23: £26.7m, however, FY23 included the same one-off exceptionally large case completion, referred to above, which delivered gross cash receipts of £9.5m. Excluding that case, gross cash receipts rose by 3%). 
• The Company's retained share of gross cash receipts from completed cases (after all legal costs and payments to Insolvent Estates) was £10.8m, a decrease of 18% (FY23: £13.1m) but again, the only reason for the decrease was the £9.5m exceptional case in FY23. 
• Cash generated from operations (after all completed case costs and all overheads but before new case investments and taxation) was £5.0m (FY23: £8.0m). 
• As at 31 March 2024, the Company had cash balances of £1.4m and borrowings of £13.7m resulting in a net debt of £12.3m (FY23: £0.6m and £10.5m, respectively and therefore a net debt of £9.9m). 

Operational highlights: 

• A record number of new case investments in UK insolvency cases, an increase of 18%: 311 in FY24 (FY23: 263). 
• A record number of 251 cases were completed in FY24 (FY23: 193 cases), with an average duration per case of 13.2 months (FY23: 15.5 months), generating a Money Multiple of 1.9x (FY23: 1.9x) and an IRR of 131% (FY23: 131%) (based on unaudited internal management information). 
• As previously reported, following the ending in April 2022 of the Covid-related emergency legislation to suppress UK insolvencies and the withdrawal of very substantial financial support to UK businesses by the previous Government, the number of UK insolvencies have been at record high levels. The first wave of these insolvencies has predominantly been the smaller and weaker "zombie" companies. Only in recent months have the larger company insolvencies, typically by way of Administration, returned to levels seen before the Covid pandemic. This has resulted in record high numbers of cases taken on by Manolete but the average case size is smaller than had been the case, pre-pandemic. By way of comparison: FY21 was the trading year that best reflects the completion values of cases acquired and funded before the Covid-19 impact (this is because, on average, cases take around 12 months to complete). In FY21, audited realised revenues were £24.4m from 135 cases: an average of £180k per case, which is close to double the average for FY24 of £96k. 
• ROI of 116% and Money Multiple of 2.2x from 933 completed cases since inception (based on unaudited internal management information). 
• Average case duration across the full lifetime portfolio of 933 completed cases is 12.7 months · 19% increase in live cases: 418 in process as at 31 March 2024 (351 as at 31 March 2023)

Current Trading 

• The first five months of FY25 have been buoyant:
  • Highest ever number of new case enquiries year to date: 348 (FY24: 286). 
  • 103 new case investments, which is broadly tracking the record 146 new case investments for the whole first six months of FY24. 
  • 116 case completions at an aggregate value of £11.8m (FY24: 93 case completions at a total value of £6.3m). o Gross cash receipts from previously completed cases is £10.3m, compared to £8.7m for the whole first six months of FY24. 
  • Net cash receipts (after all payments to insolvent estates and all associated external legal costs) are £6.5m year to date for FY25, compared to £4.6m for the whole first six months of FY24. 

Outlook 

• Given that the number of corporate insolvencies in the UK remain at record highs, the Company can look forward to a sustained period of growth. A strong recovery in the number of larger case investments signed in the second half of FY24 is also an encouraging indicator of future business strength.

A copy of the annual report and accounts will be available on the Company's website shortly and will be posted to shareholders in due course.

The full announcement and results can be read here.

Nera Capital’s groundbreaking partnership with a substantial European investment platform, is poised to significantly benefit the company’s consumer division. 

This latest success has come at a prosperous time for Nera Capital, which earlier this year expanded into Europe, opening an office in The Netherlands, adding to its locations in England and Ireland. 

Following its establishment in 2011, the company has become a pioneer in the legal finance industry. Nera Capital is a specialist funding provider to law firms across Europe and the US.  The firm has administered legal finance in numerous jurisdictions and assisted more than 200,000 claimants to date. 

Recently, Nera secured a sought after spot in the European Litigation Funders Association. Director of Nera Capital, Aisling Byrne, said: “This latest funding partner is a strategic advancement which will greatly enhance the services we provide to our clients and partners. 

“I am excited about the possibilities this funding line will unlock.” Ms Byrne called the deal a ‘significant milestone’ for the business.  She added: “Nera Capital continues to advocate for transparency and promoting higher industry standards. We assist financially vulnerable consumers, whilst maintaining exceptional returns for our investors and all stakeholders. 

“This newest collaboration allows us to enhance consumer access to justice, supporting equitable outcomes over time for more people.” 

Express Legal Funding, a leading provider of pre-settlement funding services, proudly announces the establishment of the Legal Funders for Actually Fair Funding (LFAFF), a coalition dedicated to safeguarding consumers and law firms through strategic vendor partnerships and ethical pre-settlement funding practices.

A New Standard in Legal and Consumer Protection
LFAFF aims to redefine the legal funding industry by championing fairness, transparency, and inclusivity. This new trade organization is committed to ensuring that injured claimants, regardless of their background, can access the financial support they need to cover their living costs while pursuing justice, and law firms benefit from reliable, transparent vendors to accelerate their growth.

"At Express Legal Funding, our commitment has always been to support both our clients and the legal community with integrity," said Aaron Winston, Author and Strategy Director at Express Legal Funding. "With the launch of LFAFF, we're taking this commitment to the next level by establishing a trusted alliance that prioritizes ethical standards and transparency in all legal service industry vendor partnerships, reducing overhead expenses and protecting law firms from wasted SEO and marketing costs."

Core Objectives of LFAFF

• Industry Best Practices (B2C): Implement a higher standard for pre-settlement funding, providing plaintiffs access to financial resources without compromising their legal claims.
• Law Firm Support (B2B): Providing law firms with access to pre-vetted, trustworthy vendors to enhance their practice and client service, with potential discounts for member firms.
• Ethical Standards and Transparency: Promoting high ethical standards across all vendor partnerships, ensuring that the legal funding industry remains accountable and trustworthy.

Membership and Benefits
Expanding beyond the pre-settlement funding industry, LFAFF is open to law firms and vendors who are committed to upholding the organization's ethical standards and guidelines. Members will benefit from a network of like-minded professionals, access to exclusive resources, and the opportunity to contribute to the ongoing development of industry best practices.

About Express Legal Funding
Express Legal Funding is a nationally recognized and trusted pre-settlement funding company and brand based in Plano, Texas. As a premier provider of pre-settlement funding, it's dedicated to offering plaintiffs the financial support they need while they await the resolution of their cases. The company is committed to ethical practices and transparency, ensuring that its clients receive fair and equitable services.

About LFAFF
The Legal Funders for Actually Fair Funding (LFAFF) is a trade organization founded by Express Legal Funding to promote ethical standards, consumer protection, and strategic partnerships in the legal funding industry. LFAFF is committed to fostering a fair and transparent environment for both law firms and the consumers they serve.

Nakiki SE announces that it is investigating a capital market claim of up to EUR 400,000 against a company listed on the Open Market of the Düsseldorf Stock Exchange. Nakiki is thus opening up a new area of business: the financing of securities law claims.

With this step, Nakiki SE expands its expertise in the area of litigation financing and continues its growth strategy. The financing of securities litigation enables investors and shareholders to pursue potential claims against listed companies without financial risk. Nakiki SE assumes the full cost of the litigation and receives a share of the proceeds in the event of a successful outcome.

This new business area responds to the growing demand for specialised financing models for legal claims in the capital market. Nakiki SE is supported by an experienced team of lawyers and financial experts to ensure that cases are thoroughly investigated and the plaintiffs’ chances of success are maximised.

With the establishment of securities litigation financing, Nakiki SE is positioning itself as a leading player in a dynamically growing market. We see considerable potential here to facilitate investors’ access to capital market legal protection and at the same time to diversify our portfolio,” says Andreas Wegerich, CEO of Nakiki SE.

Today a leading competition law expert, Professor Barry Rodger, has filed a legal claim worth up to £1.04 billion against Google before the UK Competition Appeal Tribunal (“CAT”). Google is accused of abusing its dominant position to the detriment of a large class of thousands of UK app developers who need to use its app marketplace, ‘Play Store’ or ‘Google Play’, to access their customers. The class action lawsuit seeks compensation for the losses in revenues suffered by those individuals and businesses, many of whom are SMEs, from August 2018 onwards. 

Professor Rodger alleges that Google has used a variety of technical and contractual restrictions to ensure that Google’s Play Store is the only place where UK app developers can market or sell apps designed for Android devices. The result is that UK app developers have little choice other than to use the Google Play Store if they want to reach a wide audience. Google has then used its dominant position in app distribution to require developers to pay excessive and unfair commissions (of up to 30%) on all their sales of digital content to customers. Professor Rodger claims that absent the combination of exclusionary and exploitative conduct, app developers would have paid less to distribute their apps and sell their digital content. 

Professor Rodger’s action follows significant litigation and regulatory scrutiny of Google’s Play Store conduct around the world, including by the European Commission, the UK’s Competition and Markets Authority and the US Congress. 

A class action is needed in the present case because UK app developers would not individually have the means to each bring claims against Google. The UK’s opt-out class action regime in the CAT provides a mechanism by which these app developers can legitimately seek damages for the harm they have suffered as a result of Google’s conduct. 

Professor Rodger’s claim is backed by a legal team composed of competition litigation and digital markets specialists, Geradin Partners and a counsel team of Robert O'Donoghue (Brick Court Chambers), Daniel Carall-Green (Fountain Court Chambers) and Sarah O’Keeffe (Brick Court Chambers). The claim also relies on the expertise of Professor Amelia Fletcher CBE, Professor of Competition Policy at the University of East Anglia, who has been assisted in preparing her economic report by a team of economists at Fideres. The claim is funded by Bench Walk Advisors, a leading litigation funder with a team of multi awardwinning finance professionals and litigators. 

Professor Rodger said: “It is extremely important that the principles of fairness and equality of opportunity underlie our rapidly expanding digital economy by ensuring effective redress for those harmed by any abusive anti-competitive behaviour in the marketplace. I am bringing this claim because I believe that Big Tech businesses like Google should not be allowed to run roughshod over small businesses. I teach my students every day about the importance of enforcement of competition law and I am now ‘practising what I preach’ by seeking redress in the form of compensation for significant business damage suffered by this class of Android app developers.” 

Founding Partner of Geradin Partners, Damien Geradin, said: “Google is one of the most powerful companies in the world. Regulators around the globe have scrutinised its Play Store conduct and consider it harmful. Yet Google continues to use its monopoly position to force out competition and to exploit app developers. It is imperative therefore that developers in the UK also have the opportunity to seek redress for Google’s wrongful conduct.” 

More information on the claim and regular updates for the proposed class can be found at: www.googleplaystoredeveloperclaim.com.  

McDonald Hopkins is proud to welcome John J. Hanley as a Member in the Business Department and the Litigation Finance Practice Group. John brings with him years of experience, a proven track record of success and an innovative spirit that will play a pivotal role at the firm.

“McDonald Hopkins is a great brand in the litigation finance space.” said John. “The goal here is to capture market share. We will continue to be among the best and most active in the litigation finance space, and I’m excited to contribute to it.”

John specializes in litigation finance and complex financial transactions. He has over two decades of extensive experience from highly esteemed East Coast law firms in first and second lien financings, private debt and equity placements, acquisition and sale of loans, securities, trade claims, and other illiquid assets. His clientele includes a diverse array of financial entities, such as litigation funders, business development companies, specialty lenders, investment banks, hedge funds and others. He attributes his success in the field to his client-focus and the way he approaches complex matters.

“I identify as a part of the client’s team. I use terminology like ‘our position,’ ‘our claims,’ ‘our proceeds,’ and I mean it. It may seem small, but I think it strikes a chord and makes a difference,” John noted.

John’s arrival is a strategic step in building upon the success and influence the Litigation Practice Group has achieved. His addition bolsters a powerhouse team of attorneys, including Marc Carmel and Edward Reilly, who have deep experience in this field. This addition aligns with the group’s recent Chambers ranking, which recognized it as one of five firms ranked in the 2024 Chambers Litigation Support Guide for Litigation Support Deal Counsel (USA-Nationwide) and Marc Carmel as one of eight attorneys ranked individually.

“With John, we truly are positioned to offer unparalleled expertise and service in the litigation finance realm. This not only affirms our leadership in the field but also demonstrates our ongoing dedication to expanding and enhancing the support we provide to our clients. We believe no other middle-market practice matches the scope of our engagements, and John’s arrival shows that the best in the business want to be here. We are thrilled to have him on the team,” said Marc Carmel, Chair of the Litigation Finance Practice and Managing Member of McDonald Hopkins’ Chicago office.

David Gunning, the Chair of McDonald Hopkins’ Business Department echoed Carmel’s sentiment.

"John is an invaluable addition to our Business Department,” said David Gunning, the Chair of McDonald Hopkins Business Department. “His experience will not only strengthen our Litigation Finance Group but will also enhance our broader finance capabilities. We’re excited to have John on board as we continue to grow our department and provide exceptional service to our clients across all areas of finance.”

John will be mostly remote from his home in New Jersey, but will be working closely with McDonald Hopkins’ Chicago office.

Thomson Reuters (TSX/NYSE: TRI), a global content and technology company, today announced it has acquired Safe Sign Technologies, a UK-based startup that is developing legal-specific large language models (LLMs).

“This acquisition marks another milestone on our journey to combine our trusted content and world-class domain experts with our cutting-edge technology. Based on our internal assessment, we believe Safe Sign’s models have demonstrated industry-leading performance across a number of domain-specific evaluations. We believe that coupling them with our industry-leading content and expertise will help us deliver greater quality and performance from our AI solutions,” said Joel Hron, Chief Technology Officer, Thomson Reuters. “We expect this acquisition to help accelerate our ability to provide our customers with a professional grade AI experience through the CoCounsel AI Assistant – the company's genAI assistant – that enables professionals across industries to accelerate and streamline their workflows.”

“We believe Safe Sign Technologies has been at the cutting edge of legal AI research since 2022, achieving significant progress in its goal to create the world’s best proprietary legal LLM. Safe Sign’s world-leading team—drawn from Cambridge, DeepMind, Harvard and MIT—is pleased to join with Thomson Reuters to become a major scientific and industrial disrupter in legal AI,” stated the Safe Sign Technologies leadership team, Alexander Kardos-Nyheim and Dr. Jonathan Schwarz.

Alexander Kardos-Nyheim, founder and CEO, founded Safe Sign Technologies in February 2022. He was joined by leading Cambridge Law and AI professors and researchers. Kardos-Nyheim’s team expanded, most notably with the arrival in late 2023 of Dr. Jonathan R. Schwarz, who became the company’s co-founder and chief scientist. Schwarz brought with him world-leading AI expertise, drove the company’s LLM strategy and enabled the company to achieve world-class legal LLM performance. The Safe Sign Technologies team will report directly to Hron and will be working closely with the Thomson Reuters Labs team. To learn more about Safe Sign Technologies and its team, visit the Safe Sign Technologies website.

Thomson ReutersThomson Reuters (TSX/NYSE: TRI) (“TR”) informs the way forward by bringing together the trusted content and technology that people and organizations need to make the right decisions. The company serves professionals across legal, tax, accounting, compliance, government, and media. Its products combine highly specialized software and insights to empower professionals with the data, intelligence, and solutions needed to make informed decisions, and to help institutions in their pursuit of justice, truth, and transparency. Reuters, part of Thomson Reuters, is a world-leading provider of trusted journalism and news. For more information, visit tr.com.

A specialist Litigation Funder which has offices in Manchester, Dublin and The Netherlands, has appointed an internationally renowned finance executive as its new Chief Financial Officer (CFO).

Finance veteran, Robin Grant, has joined Nera Capital bringing over 25 years’ experience in dealing with various asset classes and investment strategies. 

As a long-standing chartered accountant, Mr Grant explained that he has gained extensive UK and international experience with large firms through to start-ups and is now delighted to join the team at Nera Capital.

“The company has always been successful, and at the moment it is on a steep growth curve which makes Nera Capital increasingly attractive to additional institutional investors,” he said. 

“The firm has an exceptional business model where pursuit of justice for the benefit of claimants is at the heart of everything it does while also generating superior risk adjusted returns for our investors. It’s a win-win for everyone except the corporate wrongdoers.

“I’m very pleased to be at Nera and aim to make a positive contribution as part of the management team.”

Mr Grant added that Nera Capital's success is due to the team working quickly to undertake due diligence, understand the return proposition and do the work needed to get claim strategies into an investable position.

“Once we get there, we move very quickly to deploy funds and aggressively manage the litigation process to get the claims in a position where we can start settling them,” he added.

“The professionalism of the team is unrivalled; this is a team with a strong proven track record.

“They’ve done it for years, they’re all from high-quality institutional, backgrounds and they’re all really passionate about what they do, it’s a very exciting time for the team.”

Reflecting on his own career, Robin explained: “My journey after I left university began with three hard years training to be a chartered accountant with BDO in London.

“It’s an exciting sector to be involved in with lots of challenges and its these that make it enjoyable.” With a craving to earn international finance experience after his qualification in London, Mr Grant boarded a plane to Bermuda and spent the next five years gaining exposure to banking, captive insurance and hedge fund sectors, having stints with PwC and Lombard Odier.   

Looking back on his time, he explained: “I ended up living in Bermuda for five years and the Cayman Islands for two years before returning to London.

“Once back in the UK I gained further experience with large institutions, I was CFO of GLG Partners’ Fund of Funds division (now part of Man Group PLC) and boutique firms, such as Tabula Investment Management Ltd (now part of Janus Henderson), RS Platou Asset Management (now part of Clarksons PLC) and Quantmetrics Capital.

“These experiences are the grounding for everything I have done since then, and I’ve enjoyed taking that skillset and applying it to my role with Nera Capital.”

Speaking about Mr Grant’s appointment, Director of Nera Capital, Aisling Byrne, said the team were delighted to welcome him aboard and look forward to growing the firm together. 

She said: “This year Nera Capital has been able to expand substantially, while achieving significant milestones with multiple investments around the world and large settlements being also achieved “ 

“We are confident that Mr Grant will be able to guide our team through further growth, while we focus on investment returns and justice in the legal system.” 

About Nera Capital 

·       Established in 2011, Nera Capital is a specialist funding provider to law firms.  

·       Provides Law Firm Lend funding across diverse claim portfolios in both the Consumer and Commercial sector. 

·       Headquartered in Dublin, the firm also has offices in Manchester and Holland. 

·       Member of European Litigation Funders Association

.       www.neracapital.com

DocPro Limited, a leading legal technology company, is pleased to announce the successful completion of a $500,000 pre-seed investment round from Multiway Industries. This strategic investment underscores DocPro's commitment to streamlining and enhancing the delivery of legal services through innovative AI-powered solutions.

Advancing Legal Services

Established in 2020, DocPro Limited has been dedicated to making legal services more efficient, accessible, and cost-effective. Through its platforms, DocPro.com and DocLegal.ai, the company leverages cutting-edge artificial intelligence to simplify the creation, customization of legal documents. With over 50,000 registered users worldwide, DocPro.com has become a trusted resource for individuals and businesses seeking reliable legal documentation.

The soon-to-be-launched DocLegal.ai aims to be the most accessible and affordable legal tech solution globally, offering legal documents at prices as low as $2 per document. This initiative will make high-quality legal services readily available to professionals, businesses and individuals alike.

"Our goal is to enhance the delivery of legal services by harnessing AI to make legal processes more efficient and accessible," said Kim Chan, Founder and CEO of DocPro Limited. "This pre-seed investment from Multiway Industries will allow us to accelerate our development efforts, expand our offerings, and improve the overall user experience."

Strategic Growth and Product Development

The $500,000 pre-seed investment will be allocated towards advancing product development, expanding the engineering and AI teams, and implementing go-to-market strategies. DocPro's focus extends beyond document generation, with plans to introduce a comprehensive AI legal assistant service, further enhancing its offerings in the legal tech space.

Investor Confidence

"We are excited to support DocPro in their efforts to enhance legal technology," said Ellie Lee, Managing Director of Multiway Industries. "Their innovative use of AI not only streamlines complex legal processes but also makes legal services more accessible and efficient for businesses like ours."

About DocPro Limited

Founded in 2020, DocPro Limited is a legal technology company dedicated to streamlining the legal industry through AI-powered solutions. As an incubatee under the Cyberport and Hong Kong Science and Technology Parks (HKSTP) incubation programs, DocPro has developed platforms like DocPro.com and DocLegal.ai to empower legal professionals and businesses to create and manage legal documents efficiently and accurately. For more information, visit DocPro.com and DocLegal.ai .

About Multiway Industries

Established in 1978, Multiway Industries is one of the world's largest manufacturers of extension cords, power adaptors, surge protectors, energy-saving programs, and USB chargers. Committed to supporting innovative technology companies, Multiway Industries partners with visionary entrepreneurs to bring transformative solutions to market, making services more accessible and efficient for businesses worldwide.

On Thursday August 15th, LFJ hosted a Virtual Town Hall titled 'PACCAR Revisited.' The live event revisited the PACCAR decision one year later and explored what the future holds for legal funding in the UK and beyond.

Panelists included Ben Knowles (BK), Chair International Arbitration at Clyde & Co LLP, Robert Marven (RM), Barrister at 4 New Square, Nicholas Marler (NM), Head of Technical Underwriting at Litica Ltd, and Neil Purslow (NP), Founder and Chief Investment Officer, Therium Capital Management Limited. The panel discussion was moderated by Tets Ishikawa, Managing Director of LionFish Litigation Finance Limited.

Below are some key takeaways from the event:

We don't hear much from insurers in regard to the PACCAR issue. Nicholas, from an insurer's perspective, what are your thoughts?

NM: The ATE insurers' odyssey through the world of PACCAR is in some ways quite different from that of a litigation funder. At first bluff, you might think that PACCAR doesn't have anything to do with insurers because it has to do with litigation funding agreements, and you'd never catch an insurer signing an LFA, so what's the problem?

If you scratch a little deeper though, the reality is quite different. If you as an insurer, insure a funder, and the funder gives an adverse costs indemnity to the claimant, then all of a sudden, the insurer's contractual fortunes are tied to the funders. If the LFA is unenforceable, then not only can the insurer not collect its contingent premium if there's a success, but the coverage provided to the funder has vanished--this is because the LFA is unenforceable.

We actually had this exact experience play out. An opportunistic claimant sought to cut the funder out, because it felt emboldened to do so as a result of the PACCAR decision. When they were informed that doing so would void their insurance, which was to their benefit, they magically found the goodwill necessary to resolve things with their funder and an amicable solution was quickly found.

You've touched on enforceability. Given how central that is to the heart of the PACCAR issue, Robert, can you share some insights and perspectives on this corse issue?

RM: There are essentially two views on the concept of enforceability. One is that it essentially says there isn't anything wrong with the contract, just that it can't be enforced. There is another view which says that the contract is unenforceable, that it is an illegal contract. I don't agree with that. It seems this is one of the paradoxes of PACCAR, it seems to have rendered unenforceable funding agreements that were perfectly legal under common law.

A lack of enforceability is important to understand as a two-way street. It means the funder cannot enforce, and it also means the claimant cannot enforce. And this is the key to understanding why things have been put right in cases that are still ongoing. A claimant who says to a funder 'I don't have to pay you anymore,' well, a funder could say to the same token, 'I don't have to fund your case anymore.' And we have seen cases that have been over or very nearly over, where the claimants think they don't need the funder anymore and saying 'thank you very much, I needed the funding but I don't have to pay you.' Or 'I did pay you, but I want the money back.'

This is where it's important to remember that enforceability is a two-way street. If all sides want to continue to carry on, then everyone has an incentive in fixing the problem. It's only where those interests converge that seem to have led to a significant litigation dispute.

Ben, from your perspective, how do you think this affects the UKs standing as a legal jurisdiction?

BK: PACCAR created a mess, and it was an expensive mess, irrespective of where we're going to end up. There's been a lot of lawyer's time figuring out what PACCAR means and where we're going to go. The PACCAR fix, as I call it, would have cleared things up to some extend. But the absence of that means some of this uncertainty will continue. And uncertainty means additional costs.

We have these various appeals on the funding agreements out there at the moment. I would expect that in some of these cases, there will be appeals that go to the Court of Appeals, and potentially, all the way up to the Supreme Court. My feeling is, when there's a case to be funded, lawyers will find a way to get that case funded. Although I'd imagine there will be a risk premium attached to that funding, not least because everybody will be getting their funding agreements checked, double-checked and triple-checked. And you may have lawyers who disagree on what's permissible, and that leads to additional costs at the start of the case.

This session is about PACCAR, but we'd be remiss not to talk about the CJC, given how the two issues merge. Neil, you're on the consultation group for the CJC review. Are there any insights you're able to share?

NP: There's now a working party reporting up to the CJC. We're expecting an interim report from that working party to come out in late summer or early autumn, and there will be a consultation, and then the final report in the middle of next year. So we've put on quite a tight timeline.

From an industry perspective, this review is welcome, unless you're opposed to the idea of talking about regulation, which I don't think the industry is. This is a sensible organizational group that is considering these points in a proper and thoughtful way. I would encourage people to get behind the work that ILFA and ALFA are doing here, and I'd also encourage funders to get involved in the consultation phase as well. It's very important that the CJC are thinking about these points with a full and proper understanding of how funding actually works, so they can understand the impact.

I think it's also important that the industry makes sure that the review takes place in a proper context, and by 'proper context' I mean that there is an understanding that funding does have benefits. So the review should look at how good responsible funding can be encouraged and those benefits can be maximized, rather than looking at funding as a suspicious thing that needs to be controlled and is just a risk. I think there is a very positive message for funding that needs to be emphasized, and I think the CJC needs to look at it through this positive lens, and I'm confident that they will.

To view the entire digital event, click here.

The Nakiki SE announces that it has signed a Letter of Intent to acquire a portfolio of so-called casino and sports betting lawsuits with a disputed value of approximately EUR 6.3 million (plus interest of at least EUR 800,000, as well as additional costs). Nakiki SE or one of its subsidiaries intends to take over an existing portfolio of lawsuits instead of pursuing individual lawsuits as announced in the ad hoc announcement of April 17, 2024. The individual lawsuits mentioned in the ad hoc announcement of April 17, 2024, will not be financed for the time being.

According to German case law from various legally binding decisions, players have a claim for reimbursement of gambling losses, as online casinos largely operated illegally until 2021. The lawsuits to be financed by Nakiki or Legal Finance are based on this legal perspective. A ruling from the German Federal Court of Justice (BGH) and the European Court of Justice (ECJ) is still pending.

In the event of the acquisition of the portfolio and a successful outcome of the litigation, Nakiki or a financing subsidiary is entitled to up to 25% of the litigation success.

Darrow, the leading legal intelligence platform, today announced the launch of Darrow’s PlaintiffLink platform for mass arbitration.  With tens of thousands of plaintiffs already uniquely vetted on PlaintiffLink, the platform offers unparalleled quality of service for law firms in the pursuit of justice. 

PlaintiffLink is a revolutionary plaintiff-connecting tool for law firms, now built to support the complexity of mass arbitration cases. PlaintiffLink enables attorneys to plan, review, and approve potential clients through a centralized portal. It allows attorneys to connect with the large volumes of clients needed for mass arbitration. Using the platform, attorneys can gain data driven insights that power effective filing strategies and streamlined case management, backed by Darrow’s top-tier legal consultancy. 

“PlaintiffLink provides a cutting-edge solution to the risks and costs associated with mass arbitrations, and makes it easier for attorneys to promptly connect with the tens of thousands of clients needed for these types of cases,” said Evyatar Ben Artzi, Co-Founder and Chief Executive Officer of Darrow. “We’re committed to delivering technology that helps victims connect with the best law firms to ensure justice is served, even in the most complex matters that require expert attention.”

PlaintiffLink addresses the biggest barrier for attorneys considering mass arbitration cases: connecting with a large volume of qualified plaintiffs and managing them seamlessly. Through a centralized portal, attorneys can now leverage PlaintiffLink to connect with tens of thousands of thoroughly vetted, qualified plaintiffs needed for arbitrations. The service operates on a unique contingency model, shifting financial risk away from attorneys.

“We’ve built a dedicated solution to enable visibility into client cohorts in a single matter  so that attorneys can effectively file and manage cases,” said Gila Hayat, Co-Founder and Chief Technology Officer of Darrow.

PlaintiffLink enables lawyers to swiftly review through thousands of individual clients. Users can drill down into specific claim cohorts, download raw CSV data files containing all details about each claim, and review insight reports to get a more visual and statistical analysis of the case. PlaintiffLink also employs a comprehensive review process, with two tiers of expert vetting, to streamline client acquisition and reduce invalid claims. 

Darrow is committed to delivering products that drive firm growth and profits per partner, and it is planning additional releases throughout 2024 to support its users.

For more information, visit: https://darrow.ai 

About Darrow

Founded in 2020, Darrow is a legal tech company on a mission to fuel law firm growth and deliver justice for victims. Darrow's AI-powered justice intelligence platform leverages generative AI and world-class legal experts and technologists to uncover egregious violations across legal domains spanning privacy and data breach, consumer protection, securities and financial fraud, environment, and employment. Darrow is based out of New York City and Tel Aviv.