John Freund's Posts

3076 Articles

Woodsford Litigation Funding announces key strategic hire and targets significant uptick in investments in 2019/20

LONDON 4 June 2019, Woodsford Litigation Funding, the global provider of litigation financing solutions for businesses, individuals and law firms, has announced further expansion of its international executive team with the appointment of Mitesh Modha to the position of Business Development & Origination Director. Mitesh, who will play a key role in Woodsford’s business development activities outside of North America, joins from Kain Knight, a costs litigation firm, where he was a Director. Woodford’s business development team now spans the globe, with people in San Francisco, Philadelphia, New York, London, Tel Aviv, Singapore and Brisbane. “Our business continues to grow and succeed because we have a winning combination of high quality capital and high quality professionals. Particularly following last year’s injection of significant further capital by our shareholders, Mitesh and other new recruits help complete the ingredients for a successful litigation finance business” said Steven Friel, Woodsford’s CEO. Woodsford’s new Business Development & Origination Director, Mitesh Modha commented, “It’s exciting to be joining one of the world’s leading litigation funders at a time when it is growing so quickly. I am really looking forward to playing my part in taking Woodsford to the next level.” About Woodsford Litigation Funding Founded in 2010 and with offices in London, Philadelphia, Singapore and Tel Aviv, Woodsford Litigation Funding provides tailored litigation financing solutions for businesses, individuals, and law firms. This includes both single case and portfolio litigation funding and arbitration funding. Woodsford’s Executive team blends extensive business experience with world-class legal expertise. Woodsford is a founder member of the Association of Litigation Funders of England and Wales. Woodsford is currently recruiting for a number of other posts, including a Senior Investment Officer (London), Commercial Manager (London or Philadelphia) and Business Development Manager (Singapore).
Read More

Harbour Litigation Funding Backs Customer Class Action Against AMP

AMP, the Aussie financial giant which is facing a massive shareholder class action being led by law firm Maurice Blackburn on a no win, no fee basis, is facing a second class action - this one on behalf of customers. The action is again being led by Maurice Blackburn, this time funded by Harbour Litigation Funding. As reported in ABC News, the action alleges that AMP routinely overcharged its 2.5 million customer base on administration fees, dating all the way back to 2013. In some cases, the investment firm allegedly charged 1.5% in fees when it was contractually obligated to charge .5%. AMP is facing a shareholder class action in the wake of its massive stock price drop, in addition to a lawsuit by the Australian Securities and Exchange Commission. Key executives are also facing a criminal probe into a separate matter of 'fee for no service.' The customer claim is being brought by Maurice Blackburn and is funded by Harbour Litigation Funding. Harbour is set to receive 20% on any payout up to $125MM, and 10% on any number over that threshold.

Mitry Lawyers to Speak at the 5th Litigation Funding Conference in Sydney on May 31, 2019

Sydney, NSW, Australia--Ticonderoga Ventures, Inc. announces that Mitry Lawyers will speak at the Litigation Funding Conference ( https://litigationfundingconference.com) on May 31, 2019 in Sydney, Australia. Rick Mitrywill speak on the current status of the law of representative proceedings. ABOUT MITRY LAWYERS Mitry Lawyers is a boutique law firm with branches in Sydney and Melbourne, Australia. It’s clientele range across Australia, Asia and the Middle East. “Mitry Lawyers is committed to engaging Australian business with international opportunities as well as promoting Australian opportunities in global markets. We provide the expertise and legal support to facilitate both. We work to ensure our clients are best equipped to take advantage of existing opportunities and remain competitive with a rapidly transforming global market.” Our specialties are private international law including cases for and against Australian and foreign governments, the law of diplomatic and foreign states immunities, commercial litigation, and representative proceedings as well as intellectual property and media. Mitry Lawyers understand the complexities laden within the Australian legal system and endeavor to ensure that clients feel comfortable with the services provided and informed of the practical effect of legal processes. Mitry Lawyers seek to continuously support and promote the education of young law students, through the Macquarie University Mitry Lawyers Award, and the internship of foreign students. ABOUT THE LITIGATION FUNDING CONFERENCE The Litigation Funding Conference is the leading networking and business event for the industry.  Corporate counsel and attorneys from significantly sized law firms seeking finances for high value claims meet directly with third party litigation funding firms, venture capitalists and hedge funds.  Financial professionals and investors representing significant resources attend to fund suits they are expressly interested in. Time, the most valuable commodity at the event, is designed for maximum efficiency in introducing attorneys with those that provide funding to quickly identify the best opportunities and begin the deal making process. Registration for the event can be made at https://litigationfunding.co/register-sydney-2019.php For more information, please visit the website https://www.litigationfundingconference.com or contact: Ticonderoga Ventures, Inc. Marketing and Logistics Representative Tel/ Fax: USA +1 (212) 722-1744 E-mail:  info-21@litigationfundingconference.com Twitter:  @LITIGATIONFUND1
Read More

LCM: Court Approval of Settlement and Portfolio and Pipeline Update

Litigation Capital Management Limited (AIM:LIT), a leading international provider of litigation financing solutions, announces that the court has approved a settlement in respect of one of its class action litigation projects. This follows the negotiated settlement in principle of this litigation project announced on 20 March 2019.

Highlights

  • Court approval granted on 28 May 2019 with the effect that the settlement has become final and binding between the parties.
  • Further judgment expected shortly which will determine the precise amount of LCM’s share of these funds following which LCM will make a further announcement with the financial metrics of this litigation project.
  • The settlement funds will be paid within 30 days with LCM’s entitlement set to contribute significantly to profit for the current financial year to 30 June 2019.
  • Fourth litigation project that LCM has completed in the current financial period.

The litigation project relates to a class action LCM funded on behalf of certain former shareholders in a resources company formerly listed on the Australian Stock Exchange. The other party is an international professional services company and prior to a final hearing, both parties participated in a mediation where a settlement in principle was reached.

The terms of the settlement (which are confidential) were approved by the Supreme Court of New South Wales, Australia at a hearing on 28 May 2019. This renders the settlement final and triggers the obligation on the defendant to pay the settlement sum.

Class actions represent one of several types of litigation projects that LCM provides funding for across single-case and portfolios, as well as international arbitration, commercial claims and claims arising out of insolvency.

Portfolio and pipeline update

LCM currently has a portfolio of 28 projects under management. 18 of those litigation projects are unconditionally funded and 10 projects are conditionally signed. Since LCM’s last announcement in relation to its portfolio, the projects which have moved to be unconditionally funded include:

  • Proceedings in Hong Kong brought on behalf of company in liquidation alleging breach of contract and negligence against a Hong Kong company with a capital commitment to be provided by LCM of US$0.965 million.
  • An ICC arbitration seated in London brought on behalf of a hotel and hospitality developer against a large global company with a capital commitment to be provided by LCM of US$1.5 million.

The balance of new matters are signed up on a conditional basis and will be announced separately in a future update provided that they transition to an unconditional status.

The current pipeline of pre-qualified opportunities continues to demonstrate the large and diverse investment opportunities within the company. LCM currently has approximately 65 pipeline projects across a mix of litigation financing including commercial, international arbitration, insolvency, class actions and corporate portfolios. The estimated potential investment across those 65 projects exceeds A$400 million. That pipeline of investment opportunities is dynamic and changes regularly. The pipeline reflects the global nature of LCM’s business with projects in Australia, the Asia Pacific and EMEA.

Of that pipeline, LCM is undertaking due diligence, or in advanced negotiations with respect to nine corporate portfolio transactions. In respect of some of those corporate portfolio opportunities, commercial term sheets have been issued and negotiations are continuing.

Patrick Moloney, CEO of LCM, said: 

"We’re delighted to receive court approval for the settlement reached earlier this year in March. The completion of this litigation project vindicates our approach to project selection and use of active project management. The profitability and contribution from this project are also likely to be ahead of our expectations at the time of the settlement in principle in March 

“We are very pleased with the status of our current portfolio and pipeline. Both our portfolio and our pipeline demonstrate the successful implementation of our strategies of diversification by geographical region and project type as well as continued growth in the size of our portfolio.

“LCM has a strong and longstanding track record of funding class actions, which continue to make up a proportion of our diversified portfolio and pipeline of litigation projects, alongside corporate portfolios, claims arising out of insolvency, international arbitration and commercial litigation.”

About LCM

Litigation Capital Management (“LCM”) is a leading international provider of litigation financing solutions. This includes single-case and portfolios across class actions, commercial claims, claims arising out of insolvency and international arbitration. LCM has an unparalleled track record, driven by effective project selection, active project management and robust risk management. Headquartered in Sydney, with offices in London, Singapore, Brisbane and Melbourne, LCM has been listed on AIM since December 2018, trading under the ticker LIT. www.lcmfinance.com

Read More

Bentham IMF Hires Recognized International Arbitration Expert in Canada

Dispute financing company Bentham IMF has hired well-known international arbitration expert Annie Lespérance, FCIArb, as Legal Counsel in its Montreal office as it continues to expand both its arbitration bench strength, and its presence in a growing Quebec market. Annie is the eighth lawyer to join the Canadian team, and will assist in assessing commercial litigation and arbitration matters, where clients seek funding to manage the cost or risk of pursuing a claim. Prior to joining Bentham, Annie practised as a lawyer at Cabinet Yves Fortier (2012-2019) and the Permanent Court of Arbitration (2011-2012), where she acted as Secretary to Arbitral Tribunals in international commercial, investor-State and sports arbitration disputes under a wide range of procedural rules (ICC, ICSID, LCIA, UNCITRAL, PCA, ICDR, SIAC, HKIAC, CAS, SDRCC) and governing laws. Annie has been appointed as an arbitrator and is a member of various arbitration rosters, including NAFTA’s Chapter 19 Roster of Panelists and ICDR Canada’s panel of arbitrators. She has also been recognized as a Fellow of the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators (FCIArb) based in London, UK. Annie’s hire reflects the growth in arbitration funding, as well as the increasing demand for litigation funding across Canada.  Annie will leverage her unique experience acting as arbitral secretary for one of the world’s preeminent arbitrators to conduct due diligence on potential investments, and work with lawyers and clients to manage funded matters. She adds considerable depth to Bentham IMF’s global arbitration team, which also recently welcomed Dana MacGrath, the president of Arbitral Women and a leading international arbitration lawyer who was previously a partner at Sidley Austin in New York. Bentham’s team includes arbitration experts in Canada, the US, the UK, Singapore, Hong Kong and Australia. “Litigation funders have become key players in the arbitration and commercial litigation landscape. I am absolutely delighted to join the world’s oldest and most experienced dispute financing company and a team of sophisticated lawyers,” says Annie. Annie adds to a growing team in Montreal that includes Montreal office leader and former McCarthy Tétrault LLP partner Pierre-Jérôme Bouchard, and senior advisor George Hendy, a veteran Montreal litigator who practised for over 45 years at Ogilvy Renault (now Norton Rose Fulbright Canada), Phillips & Vineberg (now Davies, Ward, Philipps and Vineberg LLP) and Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt. “Annie’s arrival truly complements our team in Montreal. She brings a different and unique experience and will be a great asset for claimants not only in the international arbitration space, including both commercial and investor-state disputes, but also in all types of cases," says Pierre-Jérôme. Annie earned her law degree from Université de Montréal and her LL.M. cum laude, from Leiden University. Annie was called to the Quebec Bar in 2010 and to the Paris Bar in 2011. She is fluent in French, English and Spanish. Bentham IMF is delighted to welcome Annie to the team. She can be reached atalesperance@benthamimf.ca or +1-514-795-8787.
Read More

RPX Corporation Names Jon Knight EVP, Business Development

SAN FRANCISCOMay 21, 2019 /PRNewswire/ -- RPX Corporation, the leading provider of patent risk management solutions, today announced that Jon Knight has joined RPX as Executive Vice President, Business Development, effective May 13, 2019.

In this role, Mr. Knight is responsible for engaging with businesses of all sizes around the world to understand their patent challenges and inform them of the range of solutions RPX provides to its members to address those challenges.

Mr. Knight brings two decades of experience at International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) to RPX. Most recently, he served as General Manager, Client Financing for IBM Global Financing (IGF), where he was responsible for IGF's end-user financing business. IBM Global Financing is the world's largest IT captive financier with clients in over 60 countries and more than 20 industries. He also served as Vice President for Intellectual Property, responsible for the licensing, sales, enforcement, and joint development of IBM's worldwide intellectual property portfolio.

"The effectiveness and strength of RPX lies in the breadth and depth of expertise members can access on our platform and the IP professionals who work tirelessly to solve members' patent challenges," said RPX CEO Dan McCurdy. "As the RPX membership network grows, so does the scale and efficiency of our defensive patent acquisition efforts and related solutions. Jon's experience makes him remarkably well-suited to help drive that growth. I am excited to welcome Jon to the RPX team and look forward to working with him to bolster what makes us the market leader—the power of the collective."

"RPX's innovative solutions provide companies with actionable, and unrivaled, ways to manage their patent-related risks," said Mr. Knight. "By bringing companies together to solve their shared challenges, RPX creates efficiencies both for its members and the market overall. The value it creates for its members grows stronger with each new member. I am excited to lead the charge to bring more companies into this leading-edge network."

Before joining IBM, Mr. Knight was a Vice President at Merrill Lynch covering financial institutions and has more than 15 years of experience in the financial services industry. Mr. Knight has an MBA in Finance and an MS in Taxation from Fordham University'sGraduate School of Business Administration, and he holds a BA in Economics and Psychology from the College of the Holy Cross. A competitive triathlete, Mr. Knight lives in California with his wife and two daughters.

ABOUT RPX 

RPX Corporation is the leading provider of patent risk solutions, offering defensive buying, acquisition syndication, patent intelligence, insurance services and advisory services. Since its founding in 2008, RPX has introduced efficiency to the patent market by providing a rational alternative to litigation. The San Francisco-based company's pioneering approach combines principal capital, deep patent expertise, and client contributions to generate enhanced patent buying power. By acquiring patents and patent rights, RPX helps to mitigate and manage patent risk for its growing client network.

As of March 31, 2019, RPX had invested over $2.5 billion to acquire more than 46,000 U.S. and international patent assets and rights on behalf of approximately 320 clients in eight key sectors: automotive, consumer electronics and PCs, E-commerce and software, financial services, media content and distribution, mobile communications and devices, networking, and semiconductors.

Read More

LawCoin Brings Litigation Funding to the Blockchain

There have been numerous attempts so far, and here comes another one: LawCoin is poised to introduce litigation finance to the blockchain by allowing accredited retail investors to finance and even trade shares in lawsuits by tokenizing the offerings. As reported in Crypto Briefing, LawCoin President Marc Goldich sees opportunity in bringing litigation funding to the masses via the blockchain. He feels the added transparency and liquidity will do for the Legal Services sector what IPOs have done for private corporations. LawCoin will allow investors to purchase tokens, each of which represents a fraction of a lawsuit. Upon successful completion of the claim, investors will receive their share of the proceeds as a LawCoin, digitally recorded on the blockchain. As the platform evolves, users will eventually be able to trade tokens with one another, creating a sort-of impromptu secondary market. Goldich views litigation funding revolutionary, yet far from efficient. The fact that it’s only available to large institutional and high net worth individuals is something he looks forward to changing. And the difficulty in developing a secondaries market means that early investors can often be stuck in a claim for years, something LawCoin looks to easily change. LawCoin is part of the Tachyon 10-week accelerator. Goldich and fellow co-founder and CEO Noah Axler worry they might be a little early to market with a tokenized offering for litigation funding, yet they remain 100% convinced that this is where the industry is headed. The team have already identified strong cases for their platform, which launches later this summer.

Nevada May Be the Next Battleground in ‘The War on Funding’

The Consumer Legal Funding industry is facing another test in the state of Nevada, where bill SB 432 has already passed the Senate and now awaits a floor vote in the House. The bill seeks to cap funding fees at 40% annually, and include additional regulations such as the disclosure of all fees and disallowance of commissions and referral fees. As reported in the Nevada Current, Nevada may be on the cusp of becoming one of roughly half-a-dozen states to regulate the Consumer Legal Funding industry. George Burns, retired Commissioner of the Nevada Department of Business’s Financial Institutions Division worries that Consumer Legal Funding will negatively impact consumers who are used to traditional loan terms. Of course, the industry counters that their product is not a loan, given that funding is non-recourse and therefore not obligated to be repaid when cases are lost at trial. A recent study by Cardozo Law professor Anthony Sebok, which analyzed over 200,000 funded claims, found that in 12% of all cases the funding company incurred losses - and in 10% the funder lost their entire capital commitment. Many industry opponents have attempted to paint the funding industry in the same light as payday lending, yet there are stark contrasts: Consumer Legal Funding does not impact credit, nor does the customer face a worse financial stake - even if the case is lost - such as repossession of assets. Despite this, industry opponents such as the U.S. Chamber of Commerce continue their push against Consumer Legal Funders. With SB 432's passage, Nevada is shaping up to be the next point of confrontation in an ongoing dispute over whether funders are to be considered lenders or investors.

Legal Capital Research Institute (Shenzhen) to Speak at the 5th Litigation Funding Conference in Sydney on May 31, 2019

Ticonderoga Ventures, Inc. announces that Legal Capital Research Institute (Shenzhen) will speak at the 5th Litigation Funding Conference ( https://litigationfundingconference.com) on May 31, 2019 in Sydney, Australia. Medivh HUManaging Director at Legal Capital Research Institute (Shenzhen) will speak on the china market for litigation funding. Video:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g_2FYWr6lKg ABOUT LEGAL CAPITAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE (SHENZHEN) Legal Capital Research Institute (Shenzhen) was founded by Shenzhen Qianhai DS Legal Capital Co. Ltd. in December, 2017 as a non-profit research organization. The establishment of this Institute aims to explore the intrinsic logic between law and capital, to prompt the development of legal service market, to promote China’s progress in economy and the rule of law, as well as to safeguard the social justice. The establishment of the Institute can effectively make up for the current short of theoretical researches into relevant topics. Through the research, the Institute helps to advocate the transformation and innovation of legal service in China and meanwhile, call for new legislative actions from government perspective. The objective for Institute is seeks to realize an orderly development of Third-Party Funding in China. The Institute works with several governmental bodies, universities, arbitration institutions, non-governmental international and domestic organizations to research and discuss the litigation funding industry and its regulations in several aspects. ABOUT THE LITIGATION FUNDING CONFERENCE The Litigation Funding Conference is the leading networking and business event for the industry.  Corporate counsel and attorneys from significantly sized law firms seeking finances for high value claims meet directly with third party litigation funding firms, venture capitalists and hedge funds.  Financial professionals and investors representing significant resources attend to fund suits they are expressly interested in. Time, the most valuable commodity at the event, is designed for maximum efficiency in introducing attorneys with those that provide funding to quickly identify the best opportunities and begin the deal making process. Registration for the event can be made at https://litigationfunding.co/register-sydney-2019.php For more information, please visit the website https://www.litigationfundingconference.com or contact: Ticonderoga Ventures, Inc. Marketing and Logistics Representative Tel/ Fax: USA +1 (212) 722-1744 E-mail:  info-21@litigationfundingconference.com Twitter:  @LITIGATIONFUND1
Read More

The Rise of Third Party Funding in India

Third party funding has been legal in India since at least 1954, when the Supreme Court ruled that there is nothing morally wrong with outside funding of legal cases, as long as an attorney is not the one doing the funding. In 1996, changes were adopted to the Arbitration and Conciliation Act which further attracted the attention of third party funders. Now, thanks in large part to the construction and infrastructure industry, third party funding is gaining a foothold in the world's second most-populous nation. According to CNBC, many Indian construction/infra firms are in desperate need of liquidity, given that there is often a significant delay from government agencies in providing the rights to develop on land parcels. Company assets often remain idle on the books, which negatively impact balance sheets. As a result, many infra firms in India have outstanding legal claims against government agencies. Yet lengthy trial timelines coupled with insolvency woes leave these firms in dire straits. That's where outside financing comes into play. With several big arbitration payouts being handed down recently against government agencies (Jindal ITF Ltd won Rs 2015 crore in a claim against NTPC Ltd, and Delhi Airport Metro Express Private Limited won Rs 2950 crore against Delhi Metro Rail Corporation), the appetite for third party funding in India is growing stronger by the year.

Validity Finance Launches New Summer Fellowship for Law Students of Diverse Backgrounds

NEW YORKMay 14, 2019 /PRNewswire/ -- Leading litigation funder Validity Finance has launched a new Equal Access Fellowship, providing a paid summer fellowship to first-year law students of diverse backgrounds. For 2019, the company has selected two distinguished first-year students to spend the summer in Validity's New York office, with an option to split their time working for a pro bono organization of their choice. The two inaugural Equal Access Fellows are New York University School of Law JD candidate Amanda Gonzalez Burtonand Georgetown University Law Center JD candidate Jarrett Lewis. "We created the Equal Access Fellowship to help law students from underrepresented backgrounds obtain meaningful experience early in their careers, and begin building the professional networks that will promote their growth," said Validity founder and CEO Ralph Sutton. While at Validity, fellows will learn about the burgeoning litigation finance sector and its increasing role in leveling the playing field in commercial disputes. Fellows will interact with perhaps dozens of law firms and help review an equal number of prospective cases seeking funding, performing legal research, participating in client meetings, and drafting articles for publication in the process. After an initial five weeks, each fellow will have the option of either staying with Validity or spending the balance of the summer with a public service organization of his or her choice. In either case, Validity Finance will pay the fellows' salaries for the entire 10-week program. While both Ms. Burton and Mr. Lewis will be based in New York, future fellows will serve in Validity's offices in Chicagoand Houston as the program expands in size and scope. Validity expects to maintain an ongoing mentoring relationship with the fellows as they advance through law school and enter the legal profession.  Validity hopes participants will emerge from the fellowship with an excellent grounding in the economics of law firms and litigation risk. The 2019 fellows were chosen through a selective process that included interviews and a review of academic performance.  Candidates were also required to submit essays addressing factors that influenced their decision to train as lawyers. "We want to help lead the litigation funding sector in giving back to the legal community," said Julia Gewolb, Validity's Head of Underwriting. "Our new Equal Access Fellowship is an opportunity to invest in the development of our profession by helping promote promising, diverse young lawyers.  Fellows will gain not just a solid introduction to the business of law, but an opportunity to meet with dozens of commercial litigation practitioners, helping these young law students build a key professional network early in their legal careers." "We are delighted to welcome Amanda Burton and Jarrett Lewis as our inaugural Equal Access Fellows to New York," Mr. Sutton said. "We look forward to working with these talented law students and are pleased to be offering them an introduction to the world of litigation finance, where stellar lawyers are seeing enormous career opportunities." About the Fellows Validity's inaugural Equal Access Fellows are: Amanda Gonzalez Burton is a 1L at New York University School of Law, where she is a recipient of the Norma Z. Paige Scholarship and is a Dean's Scholar and Birnbaum Women's Leadership Fellow. She is a board member of the Latinx Law Students Association. She previously worked for Teach for America and as a Sponsor for Educational Opportunity Law Fellows at Clifford Chance. Ms. Burton obtained an MBA from Rutgers Business School in 2014 and a B.A. in Interdisciplinary Social Sciences from Florida State University in 2009, graduating magna cum laude and Phi Beta Kappa. Jarrett Lewis, a 1L student at Georgetown Law School, is a member of the Black Law Students Association and the Rise Fellows Program, a pre-orientation program for students from historically underrepresented backgrounds in the legal profession. He previously interned with Foy & Seplowitz LLC and The Legal Aid Society, and attended the Shook Scholars Institute at Shook Hardy Bacon. He obtained a Bachelor of Science in criminology from Pennsylvania State University in 2018. About Validity Validity is a commercial litigation finance company that provides businesses, law firms and individuals with non-recourse financing for a wide variety of commercial disputes. Founded in 2018 with $250 million in financing, Validity believes that capital and legal expertise combine to help solve legal problems on behalf of clients. Validity's' mission is to make a meaningful difference for clients by focusing on fairness, ethics, innovation, and clarity. Validity is committed to developing a diverse and inclusive work force in its own offices and within the legal profession as a whole. Validity embraces a broad definition of diversity, encompassing race, gender, ethnicity, disability, and LGBTQ background, as well as individuals from underrepresented social, economic, religious, and geographic backgrounds. Equal access to justice; equal access to opportunity— this is what Validity believes is fair and right. CONTACT: Allan Ripp, 212-262-7477, aripp@rippmedia.com SOURCE Validity Finance

Related Links

https://validity-finance.com
Read More

“Therium Access” not-for-profit funding initiative announces first grant awards to improve access to justice in the UK

Jersey, Channel Islands, 15 May 2019. Therium Group Holdings Limited, one of the world’s leading providers of litigation, arbitration and specialty legal finance, today announced the first recipients of grant awards by Therium Access, the firm’s not- for-profit funding initiative dedicated to facilitating access to justice. The inaugural recipients include The Personal Support Unit, LawWorks, Crosslight Advice and the Suffolk Law Centre. Therium Access is the first-of-its-kind initiative in the litigation funding industry. Grants awarded by Therium Access are intended to promote access to justice for those who lack the funds necessary to pursue or defend claims, as well as to projects that seek to improve access to justice. John Byrne, Co-Founder and CEO of Therium Capital Management Limited, said: “We launched Therium Access two months ago and we are delighted to be announcing the first recipients of grant awards. The recipients have been selected on the basis that the funding provided by Therium Access will have a significant impact and help to improve access to justice for as many people as possible. Therium is ten years old this year and the making of this first round of grants is a fantastic way to mark our 10 year anniversary.” Lord Falconer, Chairman of Therium Access Advisory Committee said: “This is a first for the litigation funding industry and will hopefully lead the way for further initiatives.  The not-for-profit funding that Therium Access is providing to these projects will provide help for a large number of individuals who otherwise would not have received legal advice and assistance, in the light of years of punitive cuts to legal aid and advice funding by the state. I strongly support the initiative Therium have taken. And am proud to be Therium Access’ chair.” Ellen Pereira, CEO of Personal Support Unit (PSU) said: “We are immensely grateful to Therium Access for their kind and most generous grant in support of four of our PSU services. In a difficult funding climate and with increased competition for limited funds, we are absolutely delighted that Therium Access is supporting our vital work of increasing access to justice. The funding will not only help us support more people accessing the civil and family courts but also help support our new delivery model, enabling us to reach more people in more places. From everyone here at the PSU, thank you once again for your generosity.” Martin Barnes, CEO of LawWorks said: “LawWorks is delighted to have been awarded one of the first grants by Therium Access. The grant will fund our project to support solicitors providing pro bono advice and representation for social security benefit tribunal appeals. With bespoke training and supervision provided by LawWorks, pro bono volunteers are achieving success rates at appeal of over 90% of cases, ensuring that many vulnerable people receive the vital financial support to which they are entitled.” Bruce Connell, CEO Crosslight Advice said: "We are incredibly grateful to have partners like Therium Access supporting our work with the most vulnerable. Like Therium, we believe that justice should be a universal concept and we are thrilled to be working with them to provide our clients with access to justice and improve their lives." Audrey Ludwig, Director of Legal Services of the Suffolk Law Centre said: "Suffolk Law Centre is England’s newest Law Centre. We work to offer access to justice for all, particularly the most vulnerable and those most impacted by the legal aid desert in Suffolk. Our services include weekly Legal Advice Clinics, a Family Support Court Helpdesk, and a discrimination casework service.  We assisted over 1,500 people in our first year with advice, casework, legal education workshops, policy work and referrals to other services. We are extremely proud to be supported by Therium Access, and are delighted that with their generosity we can continue to support the diverse communities of Suffolk to gain equal access to justice, to challenge disadvantage and inequality, and to help them understand their legal rights, obligations and protections." Therium Access is the primary expression of Therium’s corporate and social responsibility programme. Therium Access dispenses with the criteria of funding for profit and has the sole purpose of facilitating access to justice by funding cases and projects which could not usually be funded on a commercial basis.  Therium Access is a mark of Therium’s wider commitment to the pursuit of justice and the rule of law. Therium Access accepts applications from charities and other entities whose services and projects facilitate access to justice or from those seeking assistance to obtain legal representation on cases (including defence). The applicant’s need and the impact of the grant will be important factors in our review process. The deadline for the submission of the next round of grant applications is 30 August 2019. Applications need to be made by legal representatives or the entity seeking a grant.  The board of Therium Access is assisted by an Advisory Committee which is chaired by Lord Falconer, former Lord Chancellor, Secretary of State for Constitutional Affairs and Secretary of State for Justice. Therium Access aims to support access to justice in the broadest terms and considers applications that further the following causes (in no particular order):
  • The right to legal representation or due process;
  • The proper and efficient administration of justice;
  • The advancement of human rights;
  • The promotion of equalityof rights and diversity;
  • The protection of children, the elderly, the disabled, minorities, asylum seekers and other vulnerable or disadvantagedgroups;
  • The advancement of environmental protection or improvement;
  • The promotion of legal educationthat furthers the causes listed above; and
  • Any othercase or project in which a person, group, or entity will not have access to justice without financial assistance.
Therium Access is intended to be a global initiative. Its initial focus is on the UK and it will be rolled out in other jurisdictions in a number of planned phases. About Therium Therium is a leading global provider of litigation and arbitration and specialty legal finance, active in England and Wales since 2009. Over that period, Therium has funded claims with a total value exceeding £34 billion, including many of the largest and most high profile funded cases in the UK.  With investment teams in the UK, USA, Australia, Spain and Norway, Therium has established a track record of success in litigation finance in all forms, including single case litigation and arbitration funding, funding law firms and portfolios of litigation and arbitration claims.  Therium is also a founding member of the Association of Litigation Funders of England and Wales. Therium Access and its not-for-profit funding is the latest innovation from Therium which has consistently been at the forefront of innovation in litigation finance, pioneering the combined use of insurance tools alongside funding vehicles, and introducing portfolio funding products into the UK.  Therium’s ability to develop innovative funding arrangements and bespoke financial solutions for litigants and law firms complements its unmatched experience and rigorous approach to funding a wide range of commercial disputes throughout the world. In Chambers and Partners’ inaugural litigation support directory 2018, Therium was ranked as a Tier 1 litigation funder, and Neil Purslow, the firm’s Chief Investment Officer, was named a leading individual in the litigation funding industry. In February this year, Therium Capital Management was top ranked as one of the two “Leading” litigation and arbitration funding firms in the UK by legal and business directory Leaders League, in their 2019 ranking of litigation funding. Therium was also ranked as “Excellent” in the 2019 US ranking. www.therium.com  About the grant recipients  Law Works- grant for a national and well-known charity to provide funding over 3 years for their secondary specialisation project in welfare benefits law, where volunteer lawyers are trained, supervised and insured to enable them to represent clients on a pro bono basis in the Department of Work and Pensions tribunal. This is an existing project with a 90% success rate in appealing benefit cuts and approximately 270 people will receive assistance as a direct consequence of this grant. https://www.lawworks.org.uk/ Suffolk Law Centre- grant for a regional law centre which was only set up a year ago. It is the only law centre in Ipswich and serves Suffolk, which is a legal aid advice desert. The centre provides varied advice to those who cannot afford legal advice, including on family, immigration, discrimination and housing law matters, it also runs workshops in schools to tackle discrimination and provides support to litigants in person in the local Family Court. In the next 6 months alone, the centre is expected to provide advice and support to 500 people. http://www.iscre.org.uk/legal-services/suffolk-law-advice-centre/ Personal Support Unit (‘PSU’)- grants for a national and well-known charity to provide funding for 1 year for three satellite services in Barnet, Coventry and Southend-on-Sea, and an underfunded and oversubscribed service in Preston, where volunteers provide support to Litigants in Person in court, mostly in respect of family law matters. It is anticipated that these 4 services will provide 3,400 sessions of support in this period. https://www.thepsu.org/ Crosslight Advice- grant for a niche charity to provide funding for 1 year for the costs of a site in a deprived area of West London, where volunteers provide specialist debt advice and support. Many of the charity’s clients are vulnerable, with most having mental health issues and living below the poverty line. They provide a holistic service, with the aim of providing pre-emptive advice to keep people out of the justice system. It is expected that the grant will facilitate in-depth support for around 100 people. https://www.crosslightadvice.org/ Media enquiries Desiree Maghoo Questor Consulting +44 (0)7775 522740 dmaghoo@questorconsulting.com
Read More

Funders and Lawyers Discuss Defense Funding

At the recent General Counsel Forum on Litigation Finance, both funders and lawyers came together to discuss a variety of topics facing the industry. One of those is defense-side funding. What are the options for defense funding? How can defense cases be monetized? Is this really even a thing? The answer to that last question is a resounding 'yes.' Defense-side funding is most definitely a thing - though not as straightforward a thing as plaintiff-side funding. Monetization is clearly an issue for defense funding. A successful defense of a claim often results in a lack of monetization - that is to say, the party wins the case and doesn't pay out a dime. So what incentive is there for funders to take part? Well, there are several creative workarounds here. One option is for a funder to take a percentage of an asset over a select portion of its lifetime. For example, should a funder finance a defense-side IP claim, the funder may accept a percentage of the IP over a certain number of years, or up to a certain clawback benchmark. Additionally, one other (even more creative) option is to redefine what constitutes a 'successful' defense. A firm being sued for $1B, for example, may feel that a $200MM settlement or court award would constitute a success. A funder could finance the claim and take a portion of anything under that 'successful' threshold. In this scenario, there would have to be controls in place to ensure that the client isn't incentivized to take a higher settlement offer, simply in order to avoid paying out the funder's fee capture. Although the most traditional means of defense-side funding remains bundling them into a portfolio of cases. As Reed Oslan of Kirkland & Ellis mentioned, "The only effective way we've found (for defense-side funding) is to pair defense-side with plaintiff-side." Michael German of Vannin Capital was quick to point out that "it's a stretch to call lumping defense and plaintiff-side cases together 'defense funding.' Defense funding is a narrow universe, as there are only a narrow set of cases that can be funded." German may be correct, but that doesn't mean that defense-side funding isn't getting done. Oslan explained that his firm (Kirkland & Ellis) has told clients to give them $50MM of defense work in exchange for $25MM of fees. So the client is saving $25MM off the bat. In return, Kirkland gets a steady stream of plaintiff-side work which they perform on a 100% contingency basis. So it's a win-win for both the firm and the client. The fact that law firms are utilizing alternative fee structures such as this should buoy the hopes of funders looking to get in on the defense funding game. Defense-side funding may take some creativity to get off the ground, but it is certainly a viable tool in every funder's arsenal.

Pravati Capital Names Adam Tubbs Director of Business Development for New York

PHOENIXMay 10, 2019 /PRNewswire/ -- Pravati Capital, a leading litigation finance and law firm consulting company, announced today it has named Adam C. Tubbs as Director of Business Development for the Company's New York City office.

Mr. Tubbs joins Pravati Capital from Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom (Skadden), where he was a litigator in the firm's New York office for 10 years. While at Skadden, Mr. Tubbs specialized primarily in mass torts, products liability, class actions, multi-district litigations, and e-discovery, representing Fortune 500 companies in state and federal court.

In his new role, Mr. Tubbs will be responsible for leading the growth and expansion of Pravati Capital's New York office, and working with law firms and corporate clients to evaluate and manage legal risk for potential investments in large, complex legal matters. He will report directly to Alexander Chucri, Chief Executive Officer of Pravati Capital.

"We are extremely pleased to have Adam join us to build our brand and lead our growth initiatives in the important New York market," commented Mr. Chucri. "Adam brings extensive experience and insight as a litigator, as well as deep relationships with major New York law firms and in-house general counsels. He immediately gives us a strong advocate to educate the legal community on the significant benefits of litigation finance - from growth opportunities, to risk management, to increased success rates on recoveries and settlements."

"This is an exciting time for Pravati Capital, as litigation finance continues to gain traction across the legal industry as a competitive business resource," said Adam Tubbs. "Pravati Capital's collaborative team, disciplined underwriting process, and 16 years of experience with all types of litigation enables us to create financing strategies that minimize risk and maximize impact for both law firms and corporations on the most complex matters. I look forward to being part of a dedicated team that is helping to educate and bring positive change to the business of law."

Pravati Capital's primary business is commercial litigation finance, which focuses on providing capital to support both law firms and corporations pursuing high merit cases. Through its law firm consulting group, Pravati Management Group, the company works with law firms to access, deploy, and manage growth capital for partner and practice acquisition and build a scalable financial infrastructure to drive growth.

Adam C. Tubbs, Director of Business Development

Adam Tubbs spent a decade as a litigator in the New York office of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom before joining Pravati Capital. Mr. Tubbs' tenure at Skadden involved managing all phases of litigation – from discovery through trial and appeals – for high profile and complex cases on behalf of the world's largest companies in class actions, multi-district litigations, and individual actions. He has also dedicated a significant portion of his practice to pro bono work on behalf of indigent clients, receiving the New York City Bar Association's Jeremy G. Epstein Award for outstanding pro bono service in 2013.

U.S. Claims Wins First Place in Two Categories in The Daily Report

Delray Beach, FL, May 09, 2019 --(PR.com)-- U.S. Claims (www.USClaims.com), America’s premiere pre-settlement funding company, was recently awarded the top ranking in two “Best Of” categories by readers of The Daily Report, a daily legal newspaper based in Atlanta, Georgia that covers Georgia legal and business news. U.S. Claims will be featured in the “Best Of Edition” of the Daily Report as first place winners, in “Best Consumer Litigation Funding Provider” and “Best Law Firm Funding Provider” categories. “Thank you, Georgia, for your votes and confidence in U.S. Claims as your preferred funding company. We are committed to our mission of providing essential funds to plaintiffs so you, their attorney, has the time to pursue fair settlements,” stated Donna Lee Jones, Esq., VP and Executive Director of U.S. Claims. U.S. Claims, established in 1996, is the longest continuously operating pre-settlement funding firm in the United States and has been consistently voted among the best in the nation. In 2018 alone, U.S. Claims earned first place rankings by the audience of The National Law Journal in several categories including “Best of the Midwest” and “Best Consumer Litigation Funding Provider.” In 2014, the business was acquired by Florida-based specialty finance company DRB Financial Solutions, LLC, a move that has enabled U.S. Claims to assist more customers than ever before. The company offers plaintiffs awaiting a lawsuit settlement the opportunity to receive cash before their case settles with no out of pocket cost and the transactions are non-recourse to the claimant, do not require a credit check, and – best of all – nothing is owed unless the claim is successful. For more information on U.S. Claims pre-settlement funding solutions, please call 1-877-USClaims, or (877) 872-5246. About USClaims: U.S. Claims (www.USClaims.com) provides litigation funding for plaintiffs, attorneys, and surgeries. Its flagship offering is providing non-recourse financial support to personal injury victims, some of whom may have suffered catastrophic injuries from defective products, unsafe premises, motor vehicle accidents, and other types of accidents; this financial support provides the injured plaintiff the means to pay bills and endure the often long and arduous litigation process. About DRB Financial Solutions, LLC: DRB is a leading provider of liquidity solutions for consumers and SMBs. Consumer liquidity solutions are offered through DRB Capital (structured settlement and annuity cash flows) and USClaims (advances for pending personal injury claims). DRB serves SMBs through CRG Financial (bankruptcy claims), Producer Advance (commission advances) and Echelon Medical Capital (medical liens). To learn more, visit www.DRBFinancial.com.
Read More

IMF Bentham-Funded PFAS Class Action Delayed Until Next Year

The class action against the New South Wales Department of Defense, alleging contamination of the chemical PFAS which originated at a nearby Air Force base, has been delayed until next year. IMF Bentham is funding the Shine Lawyers-led claim. As reported by ABC News, the action was supposed to commence in August of this year, with Justice Jagot presiding. However the justice can no longer hear the case, and Justice Lee has taken over in his stead. Justice Lee vacated the trial date for a new one next year, as yet undetermined. The underlying case involves thousands of claimants who allege that a chemical leak at an Air Force based damaged their land and property. A trio of townships are involved in the claim, which is being funded by IMF Bentham and led by Shine lawyers. The Department of Defense has earmarked $50MM to fight the class actions. Meanwhile, angry residents await recompense, and the case is locked up for at least an extra four months longer than originally planned. Since no trial date has been set, there's no telling how long the claimants - along with Shine and IMF - will have to wait for their day in court.

In-House Counsel Awash in Concerns Over Litigation Funding

At last week's General Counsel Forum on Litigation Finance, several panel discussions covered a broad array of industry topics. In his opening remarks, co-chair Scott Mozarsky of Vannin Capital promised a diverse set of opinions on the industry - including from those who are skeptical (to put it mildly) of the benefits the industry poses to the broader Legal Services market. The first panel of the day failed to disappoint. The subject was the in-house question: what are the benefits of funding for in-house counsel? After stating the obvious - that costs are skyrocketing and there is downward pressure on legal spend budgets - the panel diverged from a discussion of benefits into one of risk assessment. In the end, panelists highlighted the potential pitfalls of funding from both a private practice and in-house perspective. Matt Atlas of Vannin Capital chaired the panel, which included a diverse cross-section of industry participants: John Salomon, Managing Member of Winchester Consulting Group, Charles Schmerler, Partner at Norton Rose Fulbright, and Linda Zabriskie, VP and Associate General Counsel at Take-Two Interactive Software, a video game developer. And by 'diverse' I don't just mean career-wise; the panel held a contradictory viewpoint on the industry relative to what one would traditionally find at a conference aimed at the funding community. Schmerler illustrated this at the outset by posing the risks associated with funding. He pointed out that just in the past few days, a funding agreement was nullified by the 6th Circuit Court in Kentucky. And even though the 3rd Circuit overturned the nullification of funding agreements in the NFL Concussion Case, the specific language used in the decision left the door open for industry opponents to continue to challenge the validity of the funding agreements in question. These rulings, Schmerler argued, pose a fundamental risk for any corporation who engages with a litigation funder. For even if the case is successful, the funding agreement itself may be voided by the court; a ruling which would then spark a lengthy appeals process, which could in turn delay any settlement or court award payout. Zabriskie added to Schmerler's concern by pointing out there is a concern from in-house counsel regarding issues such as privilege, as well as deeper ethical concerns. "Will conversations with funders come to light in a discovery motion?" she asked. This was a chief concern of her team, given that she once discovered both the existence of a funder and the conversations which took place between plaintiff and funder in a case where Take-Two Interactive was a defendant, after a discovery motion was filed and that information was not deemed privileged. The information discovered "made a difference in the outcome of the case," according to Zabriskie (although not in their case strategy going forward). Additionally, Zabriskie posited another chief concern: "Will plaintiffs counsel use a funder as a way to make an hourly fee for the next two years?" In other words, what is the possibility that your law firm essentially turns into a broker, only bringing the case and delivering motion after motion because the whole thing fully-funded, not because the chances of winning are particularly stellar? When questioned by Atlas as to whether that tension exists anyway, regardless of the presence of a funder, Zabriskie affirmed that indeed it does, "But funding can amplify that risk." Given that her team deals heavily with IP claims, which are already quite time-consuming and costly, Zabriskie is extra sensitive to any potential issue that might elongate a case. Zabriskie also pointed out that there exists a cultural reticence in the Gaming industry towards bringing IP litigation against other players in the space. It is a small world, after all, and the company wants to focus on its core strategy of developing games, not targeting competitors with litigation. That said, there will always be a need for funding in any industry - Gaming included - by small players in the space, thanks to high cost of litigation. After all, the David v. Goliath context is how litigation funding first gained shape, and even though the industry has since broadened its horizons, the need for funding by the David's of the world remains a structural foundation within any industry. Schmerler then capped off the discussion of risk assessment by highlighting the issue of control. He worries that funders may include restrictions in the funding agreement, whereby if a funded party rejects a reasonable settlement offer, the funder has rights to terminate the agreement. Of course, what is considered 'reasonable' may be up for debate. Schmerler argues that if funders experience a pattern of what they deem to be non-cooperation from their client, they may exit the case. He further posited that if a lawyer were to accept $10MM in funding, "Are you really going to tell the funder you're not going to do what they want?" The question weighed heavy as the panel came to a close. One of the points of this panel - indeed of the entire event - was to expose both funders and industry participants to all sides of the funding coin: the good, the bad, and the downright ugly. It's not like funders haven't already heard and deliberated on these concerns, so discussing them openly and forthrightly with industry skeptics can only be a wonderful thing as the sector matures. The first panel certainly succeeded in illustrating some critical concerns of both private practice and in-house lawyers in regard to litigation funding. Stay tuned for further coverage of the event, including panels on defense funding and the industry's utilization of AI / Legal Tech.

Abu Dhabi Releases Litigation Funding Rules

The Abu Dhabi Global Market Courts (ADGM) has released its Litigation Funding Rules, which explain the requirements a funder must meet in order to be officially recognized by the UAE government. As reported in Mondaq, Abu Dhabi - like Dubai - is cozying up to third party funding as a means of jumpstarting its status as a regional arbitration center. In order for entities to qualify as third party funders in Abu Dhabi, they must have at least $5MM of capital and regularly engage in third party funding (of either litigation or arbitration). Law firms and lawyers are prohibited from owning any part of a funder that is funding their client's case, and funding agreements must not include any terms that might induce a law firm or lawyer to violate the ADGM's professional code of conduct. Several other provisions mandate that funders not move to discover privileged information between attorney and client, and that funders include all termination clauses in the contract. Litigation funding is still in its embryonic phase in the UAE, so it is unclear how a court will react to any challenge of a third party funding document. That said, the ADGMs release of its Litigation Funding Rules goes a long way to assuage any concerns that courts might set aside a funded case's settlement on the grounds that third party funding is in conflict with the UAE's code of conduct.

Longford Alum Takes Litigation Finance to McDonald Hopkins

Cleveland-based law firm McDonald Hopkins is starting its own litigation funding division, with ex-Longford director Marc Carmel leading the charge. According to Crain's, the law firm is one of the first in America to open a litigation funding arm. UK law firm Rosenblatt announced during its 2018 IPO that it would dip its toe into the litigation funding waters, and has already begun to finance several cases. Should the model prove successful, expect a deluge of law firms to enter the funding fray. Carmel - who served as a bankruptcy attorney with Kirkland & Ellis and Paul Hastings prior to his Longford tenure - said investors will look to capture at least a 100% per year return on their investment, over what will optimally be a 2-3 year lifecycle of the investment. It is so far unclear how much capital McDonald Hopkins will allocate to litigation funding, and what types of cases they will pursue. Given Carmel's pedigree, we can surmise that insolvency claims are at the front of the line.

Funders, Lawyers and In-House Counsel Discuss Litigation Funding at Momentum Events Conference in NYC

On Wednesday, May 1st, funders, lawyers and in-house counsel gathered to discuss litigation funding at Momentum Events' inaugural General Counsel Forum on Litigation Finance. The event featured a diverse array of panelists and topics covered. We'll be reporting on those separately in future articles. For this first installment, we'll be profiling the opening remarks from co-chairs Scott Mozarsky of Vannin Capital, and Ralph Sutton of Validity Finance. Mozarsky kicked off the event by asking why another industry event like this one is needed. His answer was that this event aimed to be different: rather than just a conversation between funders and lawyers, Momentum aimed to bring in-house counsel into the mix. To wit, Mozarsky then explained why funding should be attractive to in-house counsel. Apart from the obvious and oft-repeated mantra of helping remove legal spend from the books and freeing up working capital, Mozarsky highlighted the shift in strategic thinking that takes place when an in-house department transitions from a cost center to a revenue generator. "In-house groups are perceived to be service groups," said Mozarsky. "They're the keepers of 'no'; the ones who say 'you can't do it.'" Mozarsky was referring to the fact that often an in-house counsel's job is to tell other departments they can't pursue certain actions, as they might pose a legal threat to the company. "Legal finance enables in-house groups to be strategic; to be positive." According to Mozarsky, that psychological transition from "the keepers of 'no'" to a positive force within the company (via revenue generation from monetizing legal claims) is one which in-house counsel should cherish and cultivate. Funders offer in-house the opportunity to be a positive, proactive force within the company - and there's more to that notion that just P&L; funding enables in-house to think strategically, as opposed to strictly on the basis of risk assessment. With that, Mozarsky handed the microphone off to Ralph Sutton of Validity Finance. Sutton began by highlighting the need for greater collaboration amongst industry professionals, stating rather bluntly, "I don't think funding is well-developed yet." That development will come as a result of increased collaboration between industry participants and experts. Sutton likened the evolution of the legal finance industry to the nine innings of a baseball game ("legal finance" seems to be the term du jour for the industry. We still use 'litigation finance' and 'litigation funding,' even though arbitration funding is included in the terminology).  According to Sutton, the first three innings of the industry's existence were predicated on the 'David vs. Goliath' mantra. That is how the industry rose to prominence. The next three innings are best illustrated by the rise of portfolio funding, which signals the industry's establishment as a long-term partner of both law firms and corporations. The final three innings, according to Sutton, can be represented by a brand new mantra: "Goliath vs. Goliath." Essentially, Sutton sees the industry evolving into a tool that is wielded not just by the David's of the world - those being the small companies looking for access to justice - but also by the Goliaths - large companies who are pursuing litigation or arbitration against other large companies. When Goliath takes on Goliath, and both Goliath's are packing litigation funding in their scabbards, that's when you'll know the industry has officially matured. Sutton predicted that mainstream in-house adoption of litigation funding is a good 3-5 years away. "That conversation," Sutton said, "is starting today." Sutton finished off his introductory remarks by revisiting a handful of predictions he made six months ago. In late November, Sutton issued five predictions for the funding industry in 2019. He wanted to candidly review those predictions to see which have come true, which are on the way to coming true, and which were simply wrong and need to be retracted. The first prediction was that more players would enter the market. As Sutton himself said, "you didn't need a crystal ball to see that coming." Obviously, as more capital enters the space, so too will more industry players. Prediction #1 was an easy lay-up for Sutton which proved correct. Prediction #2, however, was more forward-looking. Sutton predicted that we would begin to see "the green shoots of defense funding." That hasn't quite happened yet. As Sutton himself admits, "our products are not ready for that." Sutton opined that events such as this conference are an opportunity for the industry to learn and grow, and help mold products such as defense-side funding into a service that is highly-responsive to the needs of clients. Prediction #3 was that there wouldn't be a federal rule requiring disclosure as an amendment to the Federal rules of Civil Procedure. "It's a bit early to say," Sutton mused, "but I'm standing by that." Prediction #4 Sutton readily admitted he is retracting. That is the notion that the industry will self-regulate. Sutton now believes the industry is not suited for self-regulation, and any regulatory measures are likely to come from external forces (the courts or the legislature). Prediction #5 was that the NYC Bar would revisit (or possibly even fully retract) its controversial opinion that litigation funding violates Rule 5.4a, which prohibits fee-sharing between lawyers and non-lawyers. That hasn't happened yet, but Sutton stands by his assertion that the opinion has no teeth, and remains far from the existential threat many felt was posed to the industry in the direct aftermath of the opinion's release. Sutton did end with an interesting observation about the current state of the industry: that there is too much capital putting downward pressure on funding terms. He sees the emergence of large hedge funds as having a meaningful impact on the upper end of the market, increasing volatility and the likelihood of a bidding war for claims. Sutton views the industry fragmenting along claim size: with one sphere being the $2MM-$15MM claim size market (by 'claim size' we mean the size of the investment into the claim), which is where Validity currently operates. The larger claim size market, according to Sutton, is where the impact of new entrants such as hedge funds and large family offices will be felt most. Yet another bold prediction from Sutton - it will certainly be interesting to see how this one pans out.

The Case for Customized Solutions: One Size Does Not Fit All

The following article was contributed by Michael Lohrer, Chief Technology Officer of Segue Cloud Services. When it comes to technology for the legal finance community, more often than not market solutions have been designed as pre-set software, produced to function in one particular fashion to address organizational processes or workflows. End-users are often encouraged to give feedback on desired changes and customization, but revisions to the finished product are difficult for developers to fulfill after-the-fact. A pre-determined GUI and set functionality doesn’t always accommodate the ongoing needs of the customer—particularly for those who hope to grow their practices. The marketplace has come to accept the “one-size-fits-all” culture when it comes to business software where scale hinders the economics of customization. This is especially true in sophisticated market niches such as pre-settlement funding, which involves a complicated roster of labor intensive tasks, from contract generation to automated notification of multiple parties, to long-term tracking of the status of each case. Variables in these disciplines are constantly in flux, and each case has its own distinct conditions. Customers, however, are beginning to recognize that the one-size-fits-all mentality is not aligned with their needs, and are interested in finding technology vendors that have the latitude to customize their existing solution so it can be applied to specific business environments or workflows. This approach gives the customer confidence they are choosing a solution that addresses existing business needs. And if these requirements ever change—as they often do—the customer will have an even greater comfort level that the developer can make whatever changes are necessary to keep the technology relevant. Business owners should speak candidly with their technology vendors to determine if their software is designed to accommodate feature and workflow changes. Recognize that business dynamics continuously shift, and there will always be nuances and variables to every case, every new client, and every new stage of your business model as it evolves. The software you employ to help manage your processes and execute your tasks should be able to accommodate those changes, even if they occur mid-stream. For example, if your company takes on a new funding source, or if circumstances arise requiring a change in notifications or workflows, the user should be able to adapt their tools to address these new requirements, and not be expected to change their business practices to serve the limitations of software. When contemplating what type of automation software to implement for your firm, keep in mind that not all solutions take the one-size-fits-all approach. Automation software has been introduced in the market which allows users to dictate everything from the look and feel of the interface, to the ability to modify and add fields or generate notifications as needed, according to user-based rules. Companies are short-changing themselves if they invest in a system that forces employees to bend to the confines of its design—whether that’s regarding look and feel, the protocols by which users access data, or the ability to arrange application fields as they see fit. Look at it this way: Microsoft Windows is the most ubiquitous operating system in the world, yet no two users have the same desktop configuration. Each user benefits from personalizing the interface to best fit his or her workstyle. This ties into the new market emphasis on “WX,” or the “worker experience,” in which the technology and applications in the workplace address the learning styles and preferences of the individual to promote increased productivity and better job performance. Technologies for legal financing companies should emphasize flexibility, not rigidity. Uniformity has held sway for far too long, giving companies limited choices in finding an adaptable solution—but that’s quickly changing. Rather than subjecting the user to restrictions, it’s time to opt for systems that cater instead to business requirements, empowering companies in the legal finance community to thrive and grow. About the Contributor Michael Lohrer is Chief Technology Officer at Segue Cloud Services, a developer of automation software for the legal funding industry. Segue provides cloud-based solutions that help legal financing companies automate and manage all pre-settlement functions, from intake to settlement.
Read More

Oasis Financial and Key Health Team Up with Los Angeles Trial Lawyers Charities

Oasis Financial and Key Health Medical Solutions, sister companies focused on helping personal injury victims get pre-settlement funding and access to medical care, are proud to announce their support of the Los Angeles Trial Lawyers’ Charities (LATLC). The LATLC has served the greater Los Angeles community for 13 years, providing more than $4,400,000 in grants, gifts and goods to improve the quality of life in the community by supporting issues related to education, childhood hunger, survivors of abuse, persons with disabilities, and homelessness.

“As local attorneys, we’re in the trenches fighting for our communities every day. We see the need first hand, and we simply know we have to give back. It’s not about just writing checks – it’s about helping in person – at women’s shelters, at food pantries, and in schools,” said Gerald Marcus, president of the LATLC. “The generous contributions from Oasis Financial, Key Health, and our other partners are critical to helping our program succeed and ensuring services and assistance gets to those in need.”

“Supporting the LATLC was a natural fit for our company,” said Jeff Trigilio, President of Key Health. “Just like LATLC, we focus on helping people in unfortunate circumstances improve their lives. In our case, it’s partnering with attorneys and healthcare providers to help personal injury victims recover financially and physically from their accidents.”

Oasis Financial and Key Health sponsorship includes the support of one of the LATLC’s marque fundraising events, the 2019 Casino Night. On June 8th, more than 1,000 attorneys in California enjoy a little fun and comradery, while giving back to the communities they serve. “The evening is great fun – and it raises serious money for the charities served by the LATLC. Through the generous donations from our participants, we hope to raise more than $450,000 – in one night. Money that will be put to use right here in L.A., fighting poverty, improving education, and ensuring safe shelter for our most vulnerable,” said Gerald Marcus.

“We’re incredibly excited and proud to be a part of the LATLC. We work hand in hand with attorneys and providers in California day in and day out,” said Jeff Trigilio. “To be a part of this special event and incredible charity that reaches back out to help our communities is a distinct honor, and we invite all the attorneys we serve to join us in making a difference.”

------------------------------------- More About Oasis Financial & Key Health Oasis Financial was founded in 1996 by attorneys who saw a need among clients burdened with increasing medical bills and living expenses, but their cases weren’t settling fast enough to keep up with their bills. The attorneys launched Oasis to provide a way for plaintiffs to receive an advance on their settlement and make life livable until their case closed. Today, Oasis has helped over 250,000 consumers make ends meet while waiting for their case to settle. In 2017, Oasis merged with Key Health, the nation’s leader in medical lien funding. Key Health works with medical providers spanning the U.S. who offer services to injured victims on a lien or letter of protection basis as part of a personal injury claim. Together, Key Health and Oasis help personal injury victims recover both physically and financially from an accident. Working with more than 14,000 attorneys and maintaining relationships with more than 10,000 physicians, Key Health and Oasis help ensure consumers who are injured in an accident have access to great healthcare, as well as funds to cover life’s other expenses while waiting for a personal injury case to settle. http://www.oasisfinancial.com/about-oasis | http://www.keyhealth.net/Home/AboutUs 

More about LATLC  The Los Angeles Trial Lawyers' Charities (LATLC) was founded in 2006 by a small group of Los Angeles trial lawyers inspired to find new ways to serve the community beyond their roles as attorneys. LATLC’s primary purpose is to make a positive difference in the quality of life for people within the greater Los Angeles area. Today, LATLC has more than 3,000 supporters and donated more than $4,415,000 in grants, gifts and goods. LATLC has been honored by the California State Assembly and State Senate. http://www.latlc.org 

6th Annual LATLC Casino Night will be held June 8, 2019 at 6:00 pm, at the Intercontinental Hotel in Downtown Los Angeles. More information can be found at http://www.latlc.org/events

Read More

Defrauded Investor Awaits Decision from Qatari Courts

DOHA, QatarApril 25, 2019 /PRNewswire/ -- The Swifthold Foundation, which was defrauded by Sheikh Fahad Bin Ahmad bin Mohamed Bin Thani and his Qatari company, Fast Trading Group, awaits a crucial hearing on April 28 in the Qatari court, according to Delta Capital Partners, the American litigation finance and support firm that the foundation has retained. In 2011, the U.K. High Court ruled in Swifthold's favor against Sheikh Fahad Bin Ahmad bin Mohamed Bin Thani Al-Thani, a prominent member of the Qatari royal family, for an award that now tallies to nearly $6 billion. In January 2019, The Swifthold Foundation submitted a petition through its counsel, Sultan Mubarak Al-Abdulla, to the First Instance Court of Major Jurisdiction in Doha, Qatar, to enforce the award against the Sheikh. The Sheikh has failed to appear at three separate hearings, thereby prompting the Court on April 14 to set a hearing for default judgment on April 28. If the Sheikh does not make an appearance on April 28 or before, the Court is expected to issue a default judgment thereby recognizing the U.K. High Court judgment and allowing the foundation to enforce it against the Sheikh's assets in Qatar. However, the Sheikh could appear, which would allow him to mount a defense leading to additional hearings. A spokesperson for Delta stated, "Sheikh Fahad Bin Ahmad bin Mohamed Bin Thani has failed to attend three hearings to which he's been summoned to answer for the money he owes the foundation. It is heartening that the Qatari courts have recognized that this repeated failure to appear provides ample reason to rule in favor of the plaintiff and issue a judgment for nearly $6 billion. This saga has dragged on for many years through the United Kingdom Courts and the Sheikh has refused to participate in legal proceedings in both the U.K. and in his home country of Qatar, apparently believing he is above the rule of law. Soon we expect to see a step in the right direction, and we are eagerly awaiting the Qatari courts to follow through by issuing a default judgment, which will finally allow Swifthold to obtain the justice is so rightly deserves." A spokesperson for the Swifthold Foundation commented, "This is a very important hearing and we expect the Qatari courts to continue their tradition of upholding international principles of law by granting the default judgment. The fraud took place nearly a decade ago and the process of satisfying the judgment has been arduous. We are near a positive conclusion and the default judgment should be the next step towards a successful resolution."
Read More

McDonald Hopkins’ new Litigation Finance Practice Group is one of the first of its kind and unique to the legal market

CLEVELANDApril 23, 2019 /PRNewswire/ -- McDonald Hopkins LLC has announced the creation of a practice group dedicated to the relatively new and exciting phenomenon of litigation finance. The firm's Litigation Finance Practice Group is one of the first of its kind and is unique in the legal market. Litigation finance enables plaintiffs and law firms to use the "value" of causes of action in affirmative litigation or arbitration proceedings to secure funding from third party "litigation funders" by monetizing potential recoveries from litigation. The litigation finance industry is relatively new to the United States, and it is growing rapidly. Litigation funders are expanding in size and growing in number. In the last several years, many of the industry's early entrants have expanded their footprint and attracted additional capital while new litigation funders have entered the U.S. market. At the same time, law firms and litigants are becoming more familiar with litigation finance and more comfortable using it. McDonald Hopkins' Litigation Finance Practice Group will be co-chaired by members Jim Giszczak and Marc Carmel. Giszczak is chair of the firm's Litigation Department and serves on McDonald Hopkins' board of directors and executive committee. Carmel works in the Business Restructuring Services Department. Before joining McDonald Hopkins, he worked at one of the largest United States based litigation funders as director and leader of its involvement in the bankruptcy and restructuring sector. "We are excited to announce the creation of McDonald Hopkins' Litigation Finance Group," said Giszczak. "The group capitalizes on the experience of McDonald Hopkins' lawyers in the litigation finance industry and in commercial litigation." "We see litigation finance as a natural fit for the firm for several reasons," said Carmel. "First, our attorneys are collaborative. This is particularly helpful with litigation finance because we bring together attorneys with several different proficiencies to help our clients. Second is the breadth of the firm's litigation experience. McDonald Hopkins'attorneys have extensive backgrounds in the areas of law in which litigation funders seek to invest. Third is the firm's entrepreneurial spirit. And maybe most importantly, the rare experience we have in how litigation finance works. We have attorneys who have represented clients who have sought out and secured litigation funding, and we have represented litigation funders in helping them perform due diligence." The Litigation Finance Practice Group includes members from the firm's Litigation Department, Intellectual Property Department, and Business Restructuring Services Department. McDonald Hopkins will represent plaintiffs who are seeking litigation funding for individual cases and portfolios of cases and law firms who are seeking litigation funding for portfolio cases. Plaintiffs can be businesses of all sizes, including small, middle market and Fortune 500 companies. The firm will also represent litigation funders who are seeking assistance with due diligence as they evaluate potential investments. About McDonald Hopkins Founded in 1930, McDonald Hopkins is a business advisory and advocacy law firm with locations in ChicagoClevelandColumbusDetroitMiami, and West Palm Beach. With more than 50 service and industry teams, the firm has the expertise and knowledge to meet the growing number of legal and business challenges our clients face. For more information about McDonald Hopkins, visit mcdonaldhopkins.com. CONTACT:  
David Carducci  
McDonald Hopkins LLC  
600 Superior Avenue, East, Suite 2100  
Cleveland, Ohio 44114  
Phone: 216.348.5814  
Email: dcarducci@mcdonaldhopkins.com
Read More

Longford Capital Expands Geographic Presence to Dallas; Hires Top Local Talent

CHICAGO-- Longford Capital today announced the opening of its office in Dallas, Texas, and has recruited a senior litigator and trial lawyer to head the expansion.

John E. Garda has joined Longford Capital as Managing Director and Head of the Dallas Office. Immediately before joining Longford Capital, Mr. Garda was the Managing Partner of the Dallas office of K&L Gates, a Global 20 law firm, and served on the firm’s Advisory Council. Throughout his 25-year career practicing law, Mr. Garda focused his practice on representing companies involved in complex commercial litigation and disputes.

Mr. Garda represented clients in complex commercial litigation, securities litigation, insolvency litigation, and business disputes involving a variety of industries including health care, real estate, technology and outsourcing and consumer products. He has appeared before state and federal trial courts, state and federal appellate courts, arbitration associations, and administrative boards around the nation. Mr. Garda served as legal advisor to several corporate Board of Directors and Board Committees. Mr. Garda also represented clients in corporate governance matters, SEC investigations, and other internal investigations.

Mr. Garda earned a B.A from the University of Delaware and his law degree from the University of Notre Dame Law School where he distinguished himself as the Managing Editor of the Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics and Public Policy. Before attending law school, Mr. Garda practiced as a Certified Public Accountant with the public accounting firm now known as Ernst & Young in New York.

“For many years, Longford Capital has collaborated with leading law firms in Texas,” said William P. Farrell, Jr., co-founder and managing director of Longford Capital. “Some of our most successful investments have involved Texas companies. And, the legal market in Dallas has been thriving for several years. Many of our trusted law firm partners have expanded into Dallas. The launch of our Dallas office is a natural progression of the great relationships and success that we have enjoyed in Texas. It was critical, however, for us to recruit John Garda to join us.”

“John possesses the skill and experience that we value most at Longford Capital,” said Mr. Farrell. “He has run the Dallas office for K&L Gates since 2015 and has been a part of firm-wide management of one of the largest law firms in the world. His contacts within the business community and legal community in Dallas and nationally are second to none. And, he knows our business, having served as an Independent Advisor to Longford Capital for almost five years. Longford Capital expects that the Texas legal and business communities will continue to be valued partners of Longford Capital.”

“K&L Gates has an outstanding globally integrated platform filled with tremendous lawyers that provide top-notch client service,” said Mr. Garda. “As part of my incredible experience at the firm, I have had the privilege to assist with its management and operations for the past several years; my partners and I have also had the privilege of representing Longford Capital in connection with the evaluation of several investment opportunities.”

“Through this process, my partners and I have been able to really get to know Longford Capital and its team of professionals,” said Mr. Garda. “Through our working experience, it became obvious to me that Longford Capital is the gold standard in the commercial litigation funding industry. I am honored to be joining Longford Capital and very excited to open the Dallas office for this industry-leading organization.”

About Longford Capital

Longford Capital is a leading private investment company that provides capital solutions to leading law firms, public and private companies, universities, government agencies, and other entities involved in large-scale, commercial legal disputes. Typically, Longford Capital funds attorneys' fees and other costs necessary to pursue meritorious legal claims in return for a share of a favorable settlement or award. The firm manages a diversified portfolio and considers investments in subject matter areas where it has developed considerable expertise, including, business-to-business contract claims, antitrust and trade regulation claims, intellectual property claims (including patent, trademark, copyright, and trade secret), fiduciary duty claims, fraud claims, claims in bankruptcy and liquidation, domestic and international arbitrations and a variety of others.

Read More

Defense-Side Funding: Why Half the Market Remains Untapped

Litigation funding is now firmly entrenched in the Legal Services market - or more accurately, half the Legal Services market. While plaintiff-side funding is all the rage, defense-side funding is another matter entirely. Because there typically isn't a monetary reward at the end of a successful defense, funding such matters requires a creative workaround. As reported in The National Law Review, litigation funders and plaintiff-side claimants each benefit in a symbiotic relationship. One provides the asset, the other essentially underwrites it. In defense-side funding, however, there are no 'winnings.' A successful defense generally means 'not losing.' So how can such cases get funded? One way is for law firms or corporates to bundle their defense and plaintiff-side claims together. Funders would finance the entire portfolio, and take a higher return on the plaintiff-side claims than they otherwise would had they been funded individually. Another option is for a claimant to redefine success in a defense-side claim as a settlement or award that is below a certain threshold. Say a company is being sued for $100MM. The company might determine a successful defense is one where they are forced to pay $25MM or less. A funder could fund that defense-side claim, and take a multiple of their investment should the claim prove "successful."

IMF Bentham teams with Boies Schiller Flexner to provide US$30M capital and legal representation to parties with Vietnamese cross-border disputes

16 APRIL 2019:  Leading international dispute financier, IMF Bentham Limited (ASX:IMF) and renowned global litigation and arbitration firm Boies Schiller Flexner LLP (BSF) announce a collaboration to provide up to US$30 million in funding capital for cross-border disputes with a Vietnamese connection. This world-first collaboration combines IMF Bentham’s financial support with BSF’s unmatched legal and Vietnam expertise to benefit foreign investors or Vietnamese businesses in Vietnam-related disputes, including international arbitration or US/UK litigation.
Why Vietnam? Vietnam is poised to become Asia’s next economic powerhouse. It has one of the fastest-growing economies in the world and a population approaching 100 million. It is also attracting record foreign investments in major infrastructure, manufacturing, real estate, and energy projects. Leading local businesses are also beginning to expand their operations abroad. When disputes arise, they typically involve multi-national parties and multi-jurisdictional proceedings. These disputes are complex and costly, and they require legal representation with a mix of local, regional and international expertise. Very few international players offer such expertise or the flexible sources of dispute finance that litigation funding offers.  Until now. What does the IMF-BSF arrangement mean for clients? Together, IMF and BSF bring the capital and know-how required to pursue complex and high stakes Vietnam related claims. The arrangement brings clients:
  • fast and streamlined funding assessment (within 4 weeks)
  • legal representation by one of the world’s leading trial and arbitration law firms with unique Vietnam expertise
  • risk-free recoveries (neither BSF nor IMF Bentham recover any costs unless the claim is successful)
How will the arrangement work? IMF will fund preliminary investigations into potential claims and also subsidize BSF’s legal fees and external expenses (e.g., expert witnesses) for claims that proceed. Funding arrangements will be tailored for each specific case. IMF’s Chief Investment Officer (Asia), Tom Glasgow, said: IMF and BSF have had a strong working relationship on funded matters, and our US division successfully funded a matter with Mr Tran that resolved in 2016. Our new arrangement with BSF responds to increasing demand for legal representation in cross-border disputes involving Vietnamese parties and assets. It also reflects the growing appetite for third-party finance as a tool for resolving disputes in Asia.” Luan Tran, Partner at BSF said: “I lead a unique practice which combines the Vietnamese perspective (jurisdictional know-how, local contacts and language) with BSF’s global disputes expertise.  I recently lived and worked in Vietnam and Asia and regularly travel for work there. I have an intimate knowledge of the market. This collaboration with IMF allows foreign investors doing business in Vietnam, as well as Vietnamese companies doing business internationally, to pursue cases prosecuted by a leading law firm that previously might have been beyond reach for cost reasons.”  Quyen Ta, Partner at BSF said: “I have represented the top companies based in Asia and the United States in their highest-stakes intellectual property, class action, and trade secrets disputes—whether in state or federal courts, or in international arbitrations.  Clients appreciate that they can come to BSF for their Southeast Asian disputes, be able to retain experienced trial lawyers like me and Luan who are culturally and linguistically competent, and have access to a reputable litigation funding source.”

ABOUT IMF BENTHAM IMF is one of the leading global litigation funders, headquartered in Australia and with offices in the US, Singapore, Canada, Hong Kong and the UK. IMF has built its reputation as a trusted provider of innovative litigation funding solutions and has established an increasingly diverse portfolio of litigation funding assets.

IMF has a highly experienced litigation funding team overseeing its investments. We have a 90% success rate over 184 completed investments and have recovered over A$1.4 billion for clients since 2001.

For further information please see Tom Glasgow and www.imf.com.au. As Chief Investment Officer (Asia), Tom Glasgow leads the Asian investment activities and business expansion for IMF Bentham. Prior to joining IMF Bentham, Tom was a senior member of market leading international arbitration and disputes practice in Asia, where he handled complex multi-jurisdictional commercial matters for leading global businesses across a range of sectors.

ABOUT BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER

Boies Schiller Flexner is a firm of internationally recognized trial lawyers, crisis managers and strategic advisors known for their creative, aggressive and efficient pursuit of success for the firm’s clients. The firm has an established record of taking on and winning complex, ground-breaking and cross-border matters in diverse circumstances and industries for many of the world’s most sophisticated companies. The firm has 15 offices located throughout the United States and in London. It is also the only AmLaw firm with two Vietnamese-speaking partners with extensive first-chair trial and arbitration experience.

For further information please see Luan TranQuyen Ta and Boies Schiller Flexner.

Luan Tran has more than 20 years of experience in international arbitration. He has handled, both as counsel and arbitrator, some of the most significant Vietnam-related international arbitration matters. He co-authored the Vietnam chapter for two major international publications. Prior to BSF, Luan was an international arbitration partner at a prominent Vietnam-based law firm. He was also an early member of the international arbitration practice at Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan. He is currently a member of the AAA-ICDR’s Council and Asia Advisory Committee.He has three law degrees, including one from Harvard Law School. Quyen Ta co-leads Boies Schiller Flexner’s Bay Area practice. She is a graduate of UC Berkeley School of Law and is a highly sought-after trial lawyer who has more than 15 years of experience litigating high-stakes disputes in the United States and in international arbitrations. Her practice has included representing top Asian-based companies, such as Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, in its most sensitive cross-border matters, and which has included litigating jurisdictional issues throughout the United States. Her current clients include top Fortune companies, as well as Asian-based companies such as VNG Corporation (Vietnam) and Rakuten (Japan).
Read More

Journalist Seeks Litigation Funding in Al Jazeera / Muslim Brotherhood Case

Journalist Peter Greste, formerly of Al Jazeera's Egyptian bureau, was imprisoned by the Egyptian government for coordinating with The Muslim Brotherhood, a group branded a terrorist organization  by Egyptian authorities. After spending 400 days in prison and then being deported to Australia, Greste is now seeking litigation funding for a lawsuit against Al Jazeera, his former employer, whom he says lied to him about their relationship with The Muslim Brotherhood and caused him to be incarcerated in Egypt. As reported in Ahram Online, Greste, along with two other members of Al Jazeera's Egyptian bureau, were imprisoned for seven years for being members of The Muslim Brotherhood and fabricating news stories which supported the terrorist group's agenda. The Muslim Brotherhood briefly controlled the Egyptian government, before a coup by General Abdel Fattah el-Sisi overthrew the regime, imprisoning its leaders and declaring them a terrorist organization. Al Jazeera, the Qatari state-owned media outlet, had a cozy relationship with The Muslim Brotherhood. Greste claims he had no knowledge of Al Jazeera's links to the organization, and now intends to sue the news organization for negligence which resulted in his incarceration by Egyptian authorities. Greste is seeking $1MM in litigation funding to support his legal claim, which he intends to file from Australia, where he is currently residing after having been deported by Egyptian authorities a little over a year into his sever-year sentence. In March 2018, 18 members of the house of representatives, along with Senator Ted ‎Cruz, issued a letter to the US Attorney General ‎calling for Al Jazeera to be labelled a “foreign agent." Currently, the government of Qatar is under pressure by neighboring Arab countries including Saudi Arabia, Egypt and the UAE to shut down Al Jazeera, which they claim supports and promotes terrorism.

Financial Poise™ Announces “Three Case Studies,” a New Webinar Premiering May 8th at 3:00 PM CST through West LegalEdcenter™

This webinar is co-produced by West LegalEdCenter™ and part of the "Commercial Litigation Funding 101" series. It will feature Jeremy Waitzman (Sugar Felsenthal Grais & Helsinger LLP); Evan Fried (Greybridge Capital LLC); Ken Epstein (Bentham IMF); and Joel Cohen (Stout). As the legal funding market evolves, so too do the legal/ethical jurisprudence, strategic decisions inherent in utilizing funding, financial instruments used for funding, and nature of funder/funded relationship. In this webinar, a panel of experienced litigation funding professionals examine three live legal funding deals, and discuss how they impact considerations of (i) disclosure of litigation funding, (ii) fee-splitting and non-attorney ownership of law firms, and (iii) financial engineering of innovative funding deals. To learn more, click here. The webinar will be available on-demand after its premiere. As with every Financial Poise Webinar, it will be an engaging and plain English conversation designed to entertain as it teaches. About Financial Poise – Financial Poise has one mission: to provide reliable plain English business, financial and legal education to investors, private business owners and executives, and their respective trusted advisors. Financial Poise content is created by seasoned, respected experts who are invited to join our Faculty only after being recommended by current Faculty Members. Our editorial staff then works to make sure all content is easily digestible. Financial Poise is a meritocracy; nobody can "buy" their way into the Financial Poise Faculty. Start learning today at https://www.financialpoise.com/
Read More