Trending Now

Grant Farrar, Founder of Arran Capital, Discusses Litigation Funding for Public Sector Entities

On a recent episode of the Litigation Finance Podcast, Grant Farrar of Arran Capital discussed his firm’s value proposition as the only litigation funder focused solely on public sector financing. Grant explains why public sector funding merits its own categorization, what the sticking points are in convincing politicians and others of litigation funding’s value, and what his expectations are for future growth in this rapidly-evolving space.

Below are key takeaways from the interview, which can be listened to in its entirety here.

LFJ: What makes litigation financing for public sector entities so unique? Why does this type of funding merit its own differentiated category?

GF: In terms of public sector affirmative litigation, one of the undeniable and very interesting trends that’s going on across the country with every shape and size and jurisdiction, is the uptrend in affirmative litigation. So, it really started off with, as you recall, the tobacco litigation in the late 90s and early 2000’s, and now has evolved into some different issues areas, so it can be a public nuisance, relative to environmental or other quality of life issues that affect constituents around the country. It could be the opioid litigation which everybody is very familiar with, a related offshoot of that would be the Juul litigation which is being maintained right now. And a whole host of other issues that relate to consumer fraud or antitrust. One of the things about public sector entities is they are the intersection of every piece of public policy and business.

As litigation continues to increase, certainly in the time of COVID-related budget strain and stress on entities across the country, the core issue of ‘okay, how do we find funding’ and ‘how do we pay for this legal representation’ is certainly at the forefront. And this is where Arran Capital comes in, with our value proposition that we’re real excited to talk about today.

LFJ: In terms of public sector financing more broadly, what are some of the key drivers of growth that this sector of the industry is facing?

GF: It really boils down to a concept which is being discussed in public sector circles with respect to rethinking revenue models and finding ways to generate revenue in different and creative ways that will assist public entities across the spectrum. So one of the drivers on that is chief financial officers in public sector organizations and their chief legal officers that work hand-in-hand with those who set the policies. They’re coming to the realization that it’s more than just across the board budget cuts or trying to lean operations. They’re trying to find different and creative ways to manage that revenue strain while also dealing with the growing expectation and the demand on behalf of their constituents and their public sector leaders for affirmative litigation to address the issues.

LFJ: ESG—this is a hot buzz word at the moment across the investment landscape and across Wall Street. It stands for Environmental, Social, and Governance, also known as Impact Investing. The idea is that investors are starting to look beyond just profit at how companies they invest in are impacting those various metrics. A lot of institutional players are starting to mandate ESG allocations from their partners. How could this trend impact public sector financing?

GF: Great question. I’m glad you asked that. Just this week we’ve seen the largest asset manager in the world speaking to the tectonic shift in the investment space with respect to funds flowing into ESG-related investments and ESG-related approaches. And at Arran Capital, we view ourselves as part of that component and part of that wave, because if you think about what ESG stands for, one of their core case matters or case areas that we seek to invest in is with respect to the environment; those public sector / public nuisance actions. So investing with our fund that can then invest in cases that address environmental issues, that’s part of our core focus and mission.

Going to social and governance, it’s also about investing in cases that promote access to justice for citizens across the country, and ensuring that citizens and their public servants have a role as constituents and representatives of government having a responsive investment approach and a responsive and good outcome on the litigation side. So we’re really excited about how we can tie into ESG, it’s one of the main drivers in our value proposition and one of the things we seek to focus on and execute.

Click here to listen to the full episode.

Announcements

View All

Golden Pear Upsizes Corporate Note to $78.7M Amid Growth Plans

By John Freund |

Golden Pear Funding has extended and upsized its investment-grade corporate note to $78.7 million, further bolstering the firm's capacity to serve the expanding litigation finance sector. The New York-based funder, a national leader in both pre-settlement and medical receivables financing, said the proceeds will support working capital and fuel strategic growth initiatives.

A press release from Golden Pear outlines how the capital raise reflects continued investor confidence in the firm’s business model. CEO Gary Amos noted that the infusion is critical as Golden Pear seeks to scale alongside the “rapidly expanding litigation finance market.” CFO Daniel Amsellem added that the new funding aligns with the company’s capital allocation strategy, aimed at optimizing operational efficiency and executing strategic projects.

Brean Capital, LLC acted as the exclusive financial advisor and sole placement agent on the transaction.

Founded in 2008, Golden Pear has funded more than $1.1 billion to over 87,000 clients and remains one of the largest specialty finance companies in the U.S. Its business model spans legal case funding and medical receivables purchasing, with backing from a network of private equity partners that provide institutional support for continued expansion.

LionFish Updates Model Documents in Response to CJC Report

By John Freund |

LionFish Litigation Finance Ltd has released a new suite of model litigation funding documents, updating its original set from February 2021. The revision comes on the heels of the Civil Justice Council's (CJC) Final Report on Litigation Funding, issued on 2 June 2025, which calls for a regulatory structure informed by best practices, including key principles published by the European Law Institute (ELI) in October 2024.

A LionFish press release details that the updated suite incorporates several of the ELI Principles (notably 4-12) and broader CJC recommendations, except where doing so would require legislative or procedural reform. LionFish's goal, according to Managing Director Tets Ishikawa, is not to dictate market norms but to foster industry-wide standardisation and efficiency. This proactive move is also intended to spark further collaboration between funders, insurers, and legal practitioners to develop trade practices akin to those in mature financial markets, such as those promoted by the Loan Market Association and the International Swaps and Derivatives Association.

The new suite includes three core documents: a litigation funding agreement, a priorities deed to define proceeds distribution, and an assignment deed for insurance benefits. Notably, LionFish has also added documentation for co-investment arrangements, reflecting a growing trend in syndicated funding deals. The funder has already closed seven such transactions.

Managing Director Tanya Lansky emphasised that while litigation funding remains complex, making documentation public enhances transparency and facilitates quicker deal closings—an essential factor for sustaining market growth.

As litigation finance continues to mature, this move by LionFish highlights a shift toward professionalisation and standardisation. With regulators increasingly focused on transparency and fairness, such initiatives may set a de facto benchmark for others in the industry. The question remains: will other funders follow suit, or will regulatory mandates be needed to compel alignment?

Backlit Capital Solutions Launches Legal Finance Consultancy

By John Freund |

Backlit Capital Solutions has announced the launch of its full-service legal finance consultancy. The firm aims to provide comprehensive funding solutions for legal claims, offering services that include litigation finance, arbitration funding, and judgment enforcement strategies.

An article in PR Newswire states that Backlit Capital Solutions is positioning itself as a comprehensive provider in the legal finance sector, aiming to serve a diverse clientele that includes claimants, law firms, lenders, and investors. The firm's service offerings encompass litigation finance, arbitration funding, and judgment enforcement strategies, indicating a broad approach to legal funding solutions.

The launch of Backlit Capital Solutions reflects a growing trend in the legal finance industry, where firms are expanding their services to address the multifaceted needs of legal claimants and their representatives. By offering a suite of services under one roof, Backlit Capital Solutions aims to streamline the funding process and provide tailored solutions to its clients.

As the legal finance landscape continues to evolve, the entry of firms like Backlit Capital Solutions underscores the increasing demand for specialized financial services in the legal sector. Their comprehensive approach may set a new standard for how legal finance consultancies operate, potentially influencing the strategies of existing and emerging players in the market.