Trending Now

Litigation Funder Validity Finance Adds Two New Members to Investment Team with Backgrounds in Big Law and Mediation

NEW YORK (March 10, 2020) – Litigation funder Validity Finance announced two noteworthy additions to its investment team in New York and Chicago.


Joshua J. Libling, an experienced commercial and appellate lawyer joins Validity from Boies Schiller Flexner. He becomes a portfolio counsel in New York. Also arriving is James Amend, a renowned patent trial lawyer, mediator and former partner at Kirkland & Ellis. Mr. Amend becomes a senior investment advisor based in Validity’s Chicago office.

As portfolio counsel, Mr. Libling will help identify, vet and oversee litigation investments in stand-alone lawsuits and law firm portfolios of hybrid contingency cases. With a broad background in complex commercial disputes, Mr. Libling was involved in some of Boies Schiller’s highest-stakes cases including plaintiff and defendant-side actions at all levels of the federal courts.

As former Pro Bono Coordinator at Boies Schiller, he also bolsters Validity’s commitment to high ethical standards in dispute funding, including cases with claims related to social justice and exoneration.
A magna cum laude graduate of New York University School of Law, Mr. Libling clerked for two federal judges: Judge Chester Straub of the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, and Judge Kenneth Karas of the Southern District of New York.

“We’re thrilled to have a lawyer of Joshua’s caliber join us,” said Validity CEO Ralph Sutton. “He brings outstanding trial experience in big-ticket commercial disputes and is an expert at case evaluation. His commitment to social justice cases while at Boies Schiller suits him admirably for our client-first approach to funding.”

Julia Gewolb, Validity’s Head of Underwriting, worked with Mr. Libling at Boies Schiller for several years and added “Josh brings substantial case experience and understands the key milestones over the life of a litigation matter. I know firsthand how much analytic and strategic strength he will add to our underwriting process.”

The addition of Mr. Amend reflects a growing pool of complex patent disputes under consideration for funding by Validity. In addition to his three-decade tenure as a Kirkland partner, Mr. Amend served as chief mediator for the United States Federal Circuit Court of Appeals from 2007 to 2013. In that role, and in subsequent years as a JAMS neutral, he has mediated over 600 patent and intellectual property cases. Mr. Amend also authored the federal judges’ patent treatise, Patent Law – A Primer for Federal District Court and Magistrate Judges (Eds. 1998 and 2006).

“Few practicing lawyers — or judges for that matter — have the breadth and depth of courtroom experience Jim brings to Validity,” reports Validity CEO Ralph Sutton. “We are exceptionally fortunate to have his help reviewing the expanding opportunities we’re seeing in the intellectual property area.”

Surge in Cases for Funding

The U.S. market for litigation finance continues to grow at a healthy pace. Validity has screened over 650 potential matters since its launch in June 2018, including over 150 patent opportunities. Validity’s acceptance rate for investments remains under 5%, however. These investments include commercial lawsuits, arbitrations (domestic and international) and law firm portfolios, as well as asset enforcement matters.

“We suspected there would be significantly more demand for dispute funding than we’d seen previously when we entered the market in 2018. But we’ve been pleasantly surprised by the strong uptick in funding requests in each subsequent quarter,” Mr. Sutton said. He noted the firm reviewed over 120 new cases in the fourth quarter of 2019 alone. Overall, Validity has reviewed cases from 30 states and 20 countries internationally.

“We’re pleased with the steady advance of the firm, especially the robust bump in investment opportunities after just 18 months from launch,” Mr. Sutton said. “Our call-out message that litigation finance must focus on clients and building trust has clearly resonated with the market. We’re committed to using our capital to expand equal access to the civil justice system and look forward to supporting more worthy cases in 2020.”

About Validity

Validity is a commercial litigation finance company that provides businesses, law firms and individuals with non-recourse financing for a wide variety of commercial disputes. Founded in 2018 with $250 million in financing, Validity believes that capital and legal expertise combine to help solve legal problems on behalf of clients. Validity’s’ mission is to make a meaningful difference for clients by focusing on fairness, ethics, innovation, and clarity. For more, visit www.validity-finance.com.

Announcements

View All

Golden Pear Upsizes Corporate Note to $78.7M Amid Growth Plans

By John Freund |

Golden Pear Funding has extended and upsized its investment-grade corporate note to $78.7 million, further bolstering the firm's capacity to serve the expanding litigation finance sector. The New York-based funder, a national leader in both pre-settlement and medical receivables financing, said the proceeds will support working capital and fuel strategic growth initiatives.

A press release from Golden Pear outlines how the capital raise reflects continued investor confidence in the firm’s business model. CEO Gary Amos noted that the infusion is critical as Golden Pear seeks to scale alongside the “rapidly expanding litigation finance market.” CFO Daniel Amsellem added that the new funding aligns with the company’s capital allocation strategy, aimed at optimizing operational efficiency and executing strategic projects.

Brean Capital, LLC acted as the exclusive financial advisor and sole placement agent on the transaction.

Founded in 2008, Golden Pear has funded more than $1.1 billion to over 87,000 clients and remains one of the largest specialty finance companies in the U.S. Its business model spans legal case funding and medical receivables purchasing, with backing from a network of private equity partners that provide institutional support for continued expansion.

LionFish Updates Model Documents in Response to CJC Report

By John Freund |

LionFish Litigation Finance Ltd has released a new suite of model litigation funding documents, updating its original set from February 2021. The revision comes on the heels of the Civil Justice Council's (CJC) Final Report on Litigation Funding, issued on 2 June 2025, which calls for a regulatory structure informed by best practices, including key principles published by the European Law Institute (ELI) in October 2024.

A LionFish press release details that the updated suite incorporates several of the ELI Principles (notably 4-12) and broader CJC recommendations, except where doing so would require legislative or procedural reform. LionFish's goal, according to Managing Director Tets Ishikawa, is not to dictate market norms but to foster industry-wide standardisation and efficiency. This proactive move is also intended to spark further collaboration between funders, insurers, and legal practitioners to develop trade practices akin to those in mature financial markets, such as those promoted by the Loan Market Association and the International Swaps and Derivatives Association.

The new suite includes three core documents: a litigation funding agreement, a priorities deed to define proceeds distribution, and an assignment deed for insurance benefits. Notably, LionFish has also added documentation for co-investment arrangements, reflecting a growing trend in syndicated funding deals. The funder has already closed seven such transactions.

Managing Director Tanya Lansky emphasised that while litigation funding remains complex, making documentation public enhances transparency and facilitates quicker deal closings—an essential factor for sustaining market growth.

As litigation finance continues to mature, this move by LionFish highlights a shift toward professionalisation and standardisation. With regulators increasingly focused on transparency and fairness, such initiatives may set a de facto benchmark for others in the industry. The question remains: will other funders follow suit, or will regulatory mandates be needed to compel alignment?

Backlit Capital Solutions Launches Legal Finance Consultancy

By John Freund |

Backlit Capital Solutions has announced the launch of its full-service legal finance consultancy. The firm aims to provide comprehensive funding solutions for legal claims, offering services that include litigation finance, arbitration funding, and judgment enforcement strategies.

An article in PR Newswire states that Backlit Capital Solutions is positioning itself as a comprehensive provider in the legal finance sector, aiming to serve a diverse clientele that includes claimants, law firms, lenders, and investors. The firm's service offerings encompass litigation finance, arbitration funding, and judgment enforcement strategies, indicating a broad approach to legal funding solutions.

The launch of Backlit Capital Solutions reflects a growing trend in the legal finance industry, where firms are expanding their services to address the multifaceted needs of legal claimants and their representatives. By offering a suite of services under one roof, Backlit Capital Solutions aims to streamline the funding process and provide tailored solutions to its clients.

As the legal finance landscape continues to evolve, the entry of firms like Backlit Capital Solutions underscores the increasing demand for specialized financial services in the legal sector. Their comprehensive approach may set a new standard for how legal finance consultancies operate, potentially influencing the strategies of existing and emerging players in the market.