Trending Now

All Articles

3220 Articles

LexShares Research Indicates Trade Secrets and Antitrust Cases Represent Top Opportunities for Funders

Whilst a common talking point around the litigation finance industry in recent years has been its continued growth and the rise in demand for third-party funding, this shouldn’t be confused with a willingness by funders to take any case that comes across their desk. Detailed in a new piece of research by LexShares, litigation funders continue to remain selective in terms of which matters they fund, with trade secrets and antitrust cases representing attractive opportunities. Highlighted in an article by LegalDive, the new Litigation Funding Barometer by LexShares provides insights into the volume and types of cases being taken on by funders. Evaluating potential cases against 25 performance benchmarks, LexShares found that trade secrets and antitrust disputes are among the best performing opportunities for funders. However, LexShares’ director of investments, Allen Yancy, points out that trade secrets cases are still risky due to the difficulty in identifying what level of lost profits should be awarded. Hitting back against claims that litigation funders regularly pursue cases without any real merit, the CEO of the International Legal Finance Association, Gary Barnett, points out that if this were actually the case, then funders would not be able to maintain a profitable business as they would never see returns on their investments.

Litigation Funding Leaders Highlight Vast Opportunities in India

As regulatory structures continue to evolve in jurisdictions around the world, global litigation funders are keeping a careful eye on new markets that could represent fruitful opportunities. One such market that has been gaining attention recently is India, which has only been further highlighted in comments by major industry figures at the country’s inaugural Litigation and Insolvency Summit. As reported by BW LegalWorld, the conference held in Mumbai saw Omni Bridgeway’s managing director, Tom Glasgow, highlight the country as a key jurisdiction of interest. Glasgow pointed out that while LegalPay, which hosted the event, has been leading the way in the country, there are a growing number of opportunities for funders looking to explore a more global view, particularly in the realm of ESG investments. LegalPay’s own founder and CEO, Kundan Shahi, stated that India represents a huge opportunity for funders, and that LegalPay will continue its goal of widening access to justice for those who require third-party funding. The conference’s roster of speakers also included Karam Advani, managing partner for SEA at Profile Investment, Hiroo Advani, founder of Advani Law, and the entrepreneur and philanthropist, Ashwini Kakkar.

Class Action Regulatory Reform Opens the Door to Litigation Funding in Western Australia

As LFJ reported earlier this month, the Australian federal government is looking at rolling back some of the more stringent regulations on litigation funders in the country. This liberalising tone at the national level seems to also be reflected at the state level, as Western Australia looks to rework its regulatory framework for class actions, and in the process allow for the participation of third-party funding. In a piece of analysis by Australian law firm Clayton Utz, the adoption of the Civil Procedure (Representative Proceedings) Bill looks to bring Western Australia into closer alignment with the Federal class actions framework. Importantly for the industry, the bill also has the effect of opening the way for litigation funding, as it removes the torts of maintenance and champerty in Western Australia. The state government noted that this move was reflective of the fact that litigation funding is an accepted part of the country’s modern legal system, and would effectively encourage claimants to seek legal redress, where previously costs would have been prohibitive. However, analysis by Clayton Utz notes that this bill does not abolish the ban on the charging of contingency fees by law firms within these class action cases.

Lake Whillans Founders Talk Industry Growth and Current Trends

With the litigation finance industry continuing to experience high levels of growth, industry leaders are now able to see how this once niche sector has evolved into the thriving market it is today. The founders of one such well-established funder, Lake Whillans, recently discussed how the third-party funding industry has evolved and where it is headed in the future. Speaking with Above The Law, Lee Drucker and Boaz Weinstein discussed the fact that after many years of the industry trying to justify its own existence and the very legality of the process, it’s major evolution has come from the widespread adoption of the practice by law firms and large businesses, where it had previously only been commonly used by SMEs. Weinstein notes that while major law firms were more eager to work with funders than enterprise-level companies, they are now seeing a wider demand and acceptance of third-party funding by these corporations. Drucker and Weinstein highlight education as one of the most important tools funders must deploy to continue this growth, emphasising the need to educate both legal professionals and executives as to how litigation funding is not just a last resort, but a useful tool to be deployed. The founders also emphasise the need for their firm, like many others, not to take a standardised approach to funding, and to always tailor their offerings to each company or firm’s individual needs.

Stephanie Schrandt Boone joins Law Finance Group as General Counsel

Law Finance Group (LFG), a leader in the litigation finance industry since 1994, today announced that Stephanie Schrandt Boone has joined the firm as General Counsel. Having worked in executive leadership for Swiss Re for more than 17 years, Ms. Boone brings with her extensive legal governance and operational experience. “Stephanie’s experience working cross-functionally within a large, global financial services firm, is a tremendous asset to Law Finance Group,” said Kevin McCaffrey, LFG’s CEO. “We are thrilled to welcome Stephanie to our team as we scale our firm to take further advantage of the growing opportunities in the litigation finance market.” As General Counsel, Ms. Boone will provide legal advice and strategy to LFG’s executive team. Ms. Boone is excited to join Law Finance Group, explaining, “it is my personal belief that litigation risk transfer and access to justice should be available to everyone. Working with Law Finance Group will allow me to put these beliefs into action.” About Law Finance Group Founded in 1994, Law Finance Group is a leading litigation funding firm focused on investing in high-value civil litigation opportunities. Law Finance Group partners with law firms and their clients to mitigate risk, improve cash flows, and leverage existing assets in the face of litigation risk. The firm has offices in Mill Valley, New York, and Austin. For more information, visit www.lawfinance.com.
Read More

Victims of Brazil’s ‘sinking city’ to have case heard in the Netherlands

Communities lost to damage caused by salt mines in Northern Brazil are celebrating after securing the right to sue petrochemical company Braskem in the Dutch courts.

The claimants, who have seen their homes collapse and neighbourhoods disappear beyond repair in the municipality of Maceió, Alagoas due to the nature of Braskem’s mining are one step closer to justice.

Represented by global law firm Pogust Goodhead and local co-counsel Lemstra Van der Korst, they will now have their case for compensation assessed in the Dutch courts after Braskem S.A, the largest petro-chemical company in Brazil, failed to offer adequate and fair redress.

Residents of the area have watched in horror as their community has been hit by small earthquakes caused by nearby mining for salt underground for over four decades. Many have been evacuated to escape the tumbling walls, buildings and businesses after the structures built on top of now unsafe land threaten to topple further. While few others remain – resolute not to accept small sums of money offered by Braskem to relocate.

The exodus and crumbling of buildings are now evident by the ghost-town like images of the neighbourhoods which were once home to hundreds of small businesses. Braskem have offered what lawyers say are unfair sums of compensation after being obliged to remove families from the ‘red’ danger zones in the area – but have failed to accept liability.

Furthermore, the company’s ‘moral damages’ offers have been made on a per-household rather than on a per person basis and have equated to the same as the value of lost luggage by an airline in Brazil or less, according to caselaw from Brazilian Courts.

Several of the claimants attended the hearing in May in Rotterdam where lawyers argued that it is necessary to litigate against Braskem in the Dutch courts where the company have their European headquarters.

Maria Rosangela Ferreria Da Silva, 58, attended and told the court she and her family had lost their sense of identity when her neighbourhood crumbled – and she and her family were forced to move away. She lost her mum shortly afterwards and has been fighting for justice ever since.

She said: “I would say justice has been done. Thank God, I wake up with this news; I will be the happiest woman in the world, it will be my best gift. After being alive, that's it. That the God I trust has never abandoned me. So, I would say 'justice has been done', and thank God.”

The ruling rejected all of Braskem’s arguments against jurisdiction in the Dutch Courts – and an application to appeal. The court stated: “The claims against both Braskem SA and the Braskem NL entities have a delictual basis. In the main proceedings, in addition to Braskem SA, the Braskem NL entities, as part of the Braskem group, were held jointly and severally liable for the (same) damaging consequences of the earthquakes (as a result of mining activities) on the basis of the environmental liability law in general and the doctrine of indirect polluter's liability in particular, according to plaintiffs in Brazil. In this sense, the claims against the Braskem NL entities on the one hand and Braskem SA on the other are inextricably linked.”

It held: “The Braskem group, and therewith Braskem SA as top-holding of the group, has chosen to locate the entities that take the financial decisions, and its European headquarters, in Rotterdam. Against this background, Braskem SA could reasonably foresee that, if not only these entities but also herself – as top-holding – were to be sued, this could happen before this Court.

The jurisdictional success is the latest in a run of cases for lawyers at Pogust Goodhead – who recently won an appeal to have the case of 200,000 victims of Brazil’s worst environmental disaster, the Mariana dam disaster, litigated in the UK courts. They have also secured settlements in relation to VW and British Airways claimants.

Now the claim has been accepted to be heard in the Netherlands, the case is expected to enter the merits phase where liability is established.

Partner at Pogust Goodhead Marc Krestin said: “Taking this case to the Dutch courts is about getting justice for the people who have lost everything as a result of the mining activities of Braskem. They have lost their homes, their community and their sense of identity due to this large corporation taking what it wants from the land and not giving a second thought to the environment and people around them that it may harm.

“We are here to see that this does not keep happening. We now urge Braskem to take note of this ruling, stop denying responsibility for its actions and do the right thing by all those that have been harmed.”

Pogust Goodhead pursues the case in partnership with law firms Neves Macieywski, Garcia e Advogados Associados, Omena Advocacia, Araújo e Máximo Advogados Associados, and Lemstra Van der Korst.

Read More

Latin America Represents a Strong Market for Arbitration Funding, Says Omni Bridgeway

While litigation funding is still most active in the well-established markets of North America, Europe and Australia; pockets of demand are starting to gain traction in other territories. One market that funders are keeping a careful eye on is Latin America, where firms are keen to take advantage of a new lucrative revenue stream. One such firm is Omni Bridgeway, who in an article for Latin Lawyer, offered an overview of the current state of third-party funding in the region. Omni argues that Latin America is perfectly placed to take advantage of dispute funding due to its strong legal industry, loose regulatory frameworks and legal systems that are frequently receptive to arbitration, yet have claimants with minimal capital to fund proceedings. Omni highlights that the primary area of interest for funders in the region is not in commercial litigation, with arbitration dispute financing being a much more beneficial opportunity with a lower risk margin. The firm also notes that interested parties should not just think of the LatAm market through an insular lens, but instead as another venue for selecting international or cross-border cases which may involve outside investment from clients in North America and further afield. 

LCM Reports Strong Financial Results with Increased Demand Expected

As the litigation funding market continues to experience growth in major markets, as well as potential growth in emerging markets, established funders at the top of the industry are reaping the benefits. Litigation Capital Management (LCM) is an example, having recently reported strong financial results for the year with a growth asset portfolio in hand. A new article by Proactive summarises LCM’s latest financial reporting, as the Australian funder stated it had seen assets under management grow by 23 per cent by the end of June, followed by a further rise to end September. With over A$452 million in assets, the company sees continued growth on the horizon, bolstered by profits of A$20.2 million for this financial year, once again an increase of 23 per cent. Patrick Moloney, chief executive at LCM, highlighted that despite the trailing difficulties of the pandemic, the funder has been pleased to see ongoing growth for the business and expects demand to only further increase in the coming year, as the industry is well-placed to benefit from the current economic climate. LCM also stated that its Global Alternatives Return Fund I has been totally committed, with fundraising continuing for the second of these funds.

Less Than 12% of Federal and State Case Filings Present Strong Opportunities for Litigation Funding, According to First-of-Its-Kind Market Intelligence Study

Though the U.S. litigation finance market continues to expand, less than 12% of federal and state cases filed in 2021 met the minimum threshold to be considered for investment, according to a new report issued today by tech-enabled litigation funder LexShares. This finding, detailed in the inaugural edition of LexShares' special report, "The Litigation Funding Barometer: A Data-Driven Analysis of What Litigation Funders Want," illustrates the high bar that law firms and plaintiffs must reach to attract valuable funding dollars for their cases.  The report analyzes more than 30,000 federal and state case filings from 2021, graded by LexShares' proprietary Diamond Mine origination software, to provide lawyers with a unique window into how attractive their matters might be to litigation funders. The Diamond Mine algorithm assesses each case based on numerous factors, such as damages alleged and the track record of plaintiff's counsel, before assigning a raw score ranging from 1-25.  In an industry first, "The Litigation Funding Barometer" breaks down cases across several claim types and dozens of jurisdictions, while also revealing which law firms filed the greatest number of cases with strong funding potential. Among the study's high-level findings, in 2021: Trade secrets, antitrust, and contract disputes filed in federal court represented some of the strongest funding opportunities across all jurisdictions.  Federal cases presented a higher percentage of strong funding opportunities than state cases.  Law firms appearing in the NLJ500, which we categorize as "Big Law," filed the cases with the strongest investment potential. In addition to this and other detailed insights, the report's findings are accompanied by insider commentary from members of the LexShares investments team, offering lawyers and law firms key context around the characteristics of claims that typically lend themselves to third-party funding arrangements, and why. "Critics of litigation funding have long pointed to the industry's lack of transparency," said Cayse Llorens, CEO of LexShares. "By publishing this groundbreaking report, we address a critical, unmet market need for closure of the knowledge gap that still exists between lawyers, clients, and third-party funders. Providing the market with more meaningful information not only equips users of litigation finance to make better business decisions, but also supports LexShares' mission of increasing access to justice for parties with meritorious claims."
Read More