Burford Capital, the largest litigation finance firm in the world, released its 2020 annual report recently. Incorporated in 2009, Burford trades on the London Stock Exchange’s AIM, as well as…

Challenging economic times for a business can shed light on prior corporate misconduct. In 2020, there were multiple examples of corporate fraud exposed. As litigation related to insolvencies and fraud grows, institutional investors should be seeking out new strategies to ensure maximum possible recoveries.

How is portfolio funding valuable during liquidation? One case study may help explain.

Why are patent cases suddenly more plentiful in the Western District of Texas, when for years, the Eastern District of Texas was the reigning king? It could be the recent $2.18 billion verdict in a case against Intel Corp. The jury’s willingness to hand down such a high award is likely to attract interest in trying patent cases in the jurisdiction.

An order for securities for costs is meant to ensure that defendants can receive remuneration from an unsuccessful plaintiff. Monies are verified or set aside until the case is completed. If a securities for costs order is not met, a case may be dismissed. For the courts, deciding whether this is necessary can be a balancing act that weighs the hardship of a defendant who cannot recover costs, versus the financial burden to the plaintiff.

It’s always a good idea to keep an eye on which CEOs are buying shares of their own stock. Christopher Bogart, CEO of Burford Capital just made a sizable stock purchase—GBP 46,000.