Trending Now

All Articles

3217 Articles
Announcements Commercial

Financial Poise™ Announces “Ethical Problems Associated with Paying for Litigation,” a New Webinar Premiering October 16th at 1:00 PM CST through West LegalEdcenter™

CHICAGO (PRWEB) OCTOBER 04, 2019: Lawyers’ ethical duties don’t just inform how they do their jobs – they also dictate how they get paid. Join our panel for a discussion of ethical issues arising out of legal fee arrangements, from basic requirements of reasonableness to ongoing and developing law concerning third party litigation finance in multimillion dollar cases.

To learn more, click here.

The webinar will be available on-demand after its premiere. As with every Financial Poise Webinar, it will be an engaging and plain English conversation designed to entertain as it teaches.

About Financial Poise –  Financial Poise has one mission: to provide reliable plain English business, financial and legal education to investors, private business owners and executives, and their respective trusted advisors. Financial Poise content is created by seasoned, respected experts who are invited to join our Faculty only after being recommended by current Faculty Members. Our editorial staff then works to make sure all content is easily digestible. Financial Poise is a meritocracy; nobody can “buy” their way into the Financial Poise Faculty. Start learning today at https://www.financialpoise.com/

Read More
Announcements Commercial

Bryant Park Capital Arranges $104.5 Million in Capital for Legis Finance

NEW YORK, NY / ACCESSWIRE / September 23, 2019 / Bryant Park Capital ("BPC"), a leading middle market investment bank, announced today that Legis Finance Ltd. ("Legis" or the "Company") recently closed on a $104.5 million capital raise transaction with a global investment management firm. This financing adds to its current insurance and merchant banking capacity, and gives the Company a long-term capital partner to finance operations and originations.
BPC served as the exclusive financial advisor to Legis in connection with this transaction. "The Bryant Park Capital team acted as a true extension of our company and had our best interests in mind every step of the way. We could not have been more pleased with their professionalism and expertise in positioning the opportunity and helping us gain senior level access to leading specialty finance investors. I would highly recommend their services to any originator seeking to raise institutional capital," said Tim Scrantom, Managing Director at Legis Finance. About Legis Finance, Ltd. Founded by seasoned commercial litigation funding executives who launched one of the industry's first institutional investment funds in 2007, Legis was formed to disrupt the traditional commercial claim investment marketplace. Legis' model is centered around providing independent advice on structuring litigation finance investments and insurance solutions to leading global law firms. Through its partnership with one of the world's largest insurance groups, and now a global investment management firm, Legis has developed a suite of novel products geared to helping law firms and their clientele invest in large-scale commercial litigation assets. For more information about Legis, please visit www.legisfinance.com About Bryant Park Capital Bryant Park Capital is an investment bank providing M&A and corporate finance advisory services to emerging growth and middle market public and private companies. BPC has deep expertise and a diversified, well-founded breadth of experience in a number of sectors, including financial services, healthcare services and, more recently, cannabis. BPC has arranged lines of credit, raised growth equity, and assisted in mergers and acquisitions for its clients. The BPC team has completed over 300 assignments representing an aggregate transaction value of over $64 billion. For more information about Bryant Park Capital, please visit www.bryantparkcapital.com. Contact: Dan Avnir, Managing Director 212-798-8202 davnir@bryantparkcapital.com SOURCE: Bryant Park Capital
Read More
The LFJ Podcast
Hosted By Kevin Flood |
In this episode, we sat down with Kevin Flood - Chief Operating Officer of Segue Cloud Services. Segue is a customized software built on the Salesforce platform, designed to automate the business processes of pre-settlement funding companies. For more information on Segue, you can visit them at their website:  https://seguecloudservices.com [podcast_episode episode="4528" content="title,player,details"]
Commercial

Some Considerations for IP Lawyers Regarding Litigation Finance

The recent LF Dealmakers conference in NYC highlighted several key issues facing the funding industry. And there exists a clear overlap between litigation funding and IP, given that IP is the most-funded legal sector at the moment (additionally, the organizer of LF Dealmakers, Wendy Chou, hosts an annual IP Dealmakers event). So naturally, one of the topics discussed at LF Dealmakers is how IP lawyers should interact with the funding market. As reported in Above the Law, it's imperative that IP attorneys begin fostering relationships with funders. This includes discussing a funder's specific interests, submitting cases for diligence, and questioning funders as to how their service can benefit one's IP practice. The good news is that funders actually want to engage with attorneys - it's how they source investments, after all - so building rapport with funders shouldn't be too difficult. Funders are even looking at ways to innovate their product to enable partnerships with law firms (portfolio, defense-side, and small claims funding all come to mind). What's more, even with the devaluation of patent cases due to recent legislation, that hasn't dampened the funding community's interest in the sector. Patent claims are notoriously costly and time-consuming so there will always be a need for litigation funding, even if the risk/reward ratio isn't quite what it once was. One panelist at the LF Dealmakers conference recounted a story where one partner at an IP firm confirmed that the firm does not use funding. Meanwhile, another partner was actively soliciting funding for one of their claims. This underscores the need for IP lawyers to delineate a clear strategy with regard to funding - to what extent they will pursue it, and how they plan to approach the market. Like it or not, litigation funding and IP are highly-intertwined. Any IP lawyer who refuses to recognize this brave new world is missing out on a resource that his or her competitors are clearly leveraging.
Announcements Consumer

Modeso LLC Announces New Senior Credit Facility

KATONAH, NY / ACCESSWIRE / October 1, 2019 / Modeso LLC dba RapidFunds ("RapidFunds" or the "Company") announced today that it has closed on a $70 million term loan facility, consisting of a $40 million delayed draw term loan and $30 million accordion feature, with a multi-billion dollar institutional investment firm. This financing provides the Company a long-term capital partner to enable RapidFunds to grow its business and expand its network of law firm relationships.

Founded in 2004 by a group of former career attorneys, RapidFunds is a leading post-settlement litigation finance company that is engaged in accelerating the working capital conversion cycle for U.S. plaintiff law firms awaiting disbursement of proceeds from a legal settlement. The Company has funded over 2,300 transactions representing over $160,000,000 in total origination volume.

"We are delighted to have completed this important financing transaction for RapidFunds," said Peter Speziale, President & CEO of the Company. "Our new senior credit facility provides us with significant capital to expand our business, as well as a long-term partner that will add tremendous value to our company. We'd also like to extend our appreciation to Bryant Park Capital, who was invaluable to RapidFunds over the course of this financing process."

Bryant Park Capital LLC served as exclusive financial advisor to RapidFunds in connection with this transaction.

About RapidFunds

For over 15 years, RapidFunds has assisted U.S. plaintiff law firms in accelerating the receipt of attorney fees in legal settlements. With a focus on superior client service and speed of execution, the Company has provided innovative financing solutions to hundreds of law firms nationally.

For more information about RapidFunds, please visit www.rapidfunds.com.

About Bryant Park Capital

Bryant Park Capital ("BPC") is an investment bank providing M&A and corporate finance advisory services to emerging growth and middle market public and private companies. BPC has arranged lines of credit, raised growth equity, and assisted in mergers and acquisitions for its clients. BPC's professionals have completed over 300 assignments representing an aggregate transaction value of over $64 billion.

For more information about Bryant Park Capital, please visit www.bryantparkcapital.com.

Contact: Bryant Park Capital Joel Magerman, Managing Partner Phone: (212) 798-8212 Email: jmagerman@bryantparkcapital.com

Matt Pennino, Managing Director Phone: (212) 798-8216 Email: mpennino@bryantparkcapital.com

RapidFunds Peter J. Speziale, President & CEO Phone: (914) 552-4261 Email: pspeziale@rapidfunds.com

SOURCE: Modeso LLC dba RapidFunds

Read More
Announcements Commercial

The Association of Litigation Funders of England and Wales appoints Susan Dunn as Chair

London 2 October 2019: The Association of Litigation Funders of England & Wales (“the ALF”) today announced the appointment of Susan Dunn as Chair at the ALF’s Annual General Meeting. Susan Dunn currently serves as a Director of the ALF and succeeds Leslie Perrin, following his expression of a desire to stand down this year after serving as Chair for almost 8 years. Susan Dunn is one of the co-founders of Harbour Litigation Funding, one of the industry’s leading litigation funders.  Susan qualified as a solicitor in 1992 and has worked as a commercial litigator in both the United Kingdom and the United States where she was also a diplomat (Vice-Consul Investment) for the British Government.  Susan was central to the completion in 2011 of the Code of Conduct in England and Wales for Litigation Funders and the formation of the ALF in 2011. Leslie Perrin said: “Susan is one of the pioneers of the litigation funding industry and she has worked tirelessly to raise awareness of how litigation funding can promote access to justice and facilitate the resolution of disputes. Under Susan’s leadership, the ALF will continue to be regarded as embodying the best practice gold standard of the litigation funding industry.” Susan Dunn, Chair of ALF said: “It is an honour to take over the Chair of the ALF from Leslie, who took on the leadership of the ALF when it was formed in November 2011.  His work has ensured that our members adhere to the highest standards at a time of growth in litigation funding. I look forward to continuing to work with Leslie and all of my other colleagues in the industry, as well as the Government and regulators, and to ensure excellence in the provision of litigation and arbitration funding as the industry continues to grow and develop.” The Association of Litigation Funders is an independent body that has been charged by the Ministry of Justice with delivering self-regulation of litigation funding in England and Wales.  Litigation funding is the provision by a third party of finance to a party to litigation or arbitration, which is used to pay for the legal costs of the dispute, in exchange for the funder taking a share of the proceeds in the event of a successful outcome. Media enquiries Desiree Maghoo Questor Consulting T: +44 (0)7775 522740 dmaghoo@questorconsulting.com About the Association of Litigation Funders The Association of Litigation Funders (the ALF) is an independent body that has been charged by the Ministry of Justice with delivering self-regulation of litigation funding in England and Wales. Litigation funding is the provision by a third party of non-recourse finance to a party to litigation or arbitration, which is used to pay for the legal costs of the dispute, in exchange for the funder taking a share of the proceeds in the event of a successful outcome. The litigation funding industry has established and paid for its own regulation and defined best practice, helping to protect claimants who seek the rational management of financial risk in litigation and arbitration. By working with a Funder Member of the ALF, parties accessing litigation funding are assured that they will find an organisation that strives to meet the high-quality standards that should define this industry. The ALF Code of Conduct sets out the standards by which all Funder Members of the ALF must abide. It sets the standards for the capital adequacy of funders, sets out the specific, limited circumstances in which funders may be permitted to withdraw from a case, and outlines the way in which the roles of funders, litigants and their lawyers should be kept separate. The ALF also maintains robust and efficient complaints handling procedures. The ALF actively engages with government, legislators, regulators and other policy makers to shape the regulatory environment for litigation funding in England and Wales. ALF board members include Susan Dunn, Neil Purslow, Christopher Bogart, Jonathan Barnes who was re-elected at the AGM and Rob Rothkopf, Managing Partner of Balance Legal Capital LLP, who joins the board for the first time. Funder members of the ALF include Augusta Ventures Ltd, Balance Legal Capital LLP, Burford Capital, Calunius Capital LLP, Harbour Litigation Funding Ltd, IMF Bentham, Innsworth Advisors Ltd, Redress Solutions PLC, Therium Capital Management Ltd, Vannin Capital PCC and Woodsford Litigation Funding Ltd. For more information please visit: http://associationoflitigationfunders.com/
Read More
Commercial

Burford Capital Brings Columbia Law School Study to Court in Bid to Uncover Market Manipulation

Burford Capital has commissioned a study by Joshua Mitts of Columbia Law School which found that there is indeed evidence to back the funder's claim that it was the victim of market manipulation in the wake of the Muddy Waters attack which shed 50% of the stock's valuation in a single day. Burford is presenting the study in court to compel the London Stock Exchange to release the names of the short-seller sho it says manipulated the trading. According to City A.M., Burford is accusing market manipulators of 'spoofing' and 'layering,' whereby a trader issues a heavy dose of sell order on a particular stock, then quickly cancels those orders. The idea is that the cancelled trades place downward pressure on a stock and can lead to a bear-rush - or selloff - which any short-seller will of course benefit from. Carson Block, Muddy Waters' founder, denies any allegations his firm was involved in the spoofing and layering tactics. He alleges these are tools used by high-frequency traders and computer algorithms, which he claims his firm has zero capability of facilitating. Block contends that his company's public short of Burford is what led to the stock decline, and that any spoofing or layering - if it did occur - was not his firm's doing. But Burford isn't so sure. The funder is seeking to compel the LSE to divulge the identities of the spoofers/layerers, and has petitioned the High Court for an order. The funder hasn't ruled out civil litigation and even criminal proceedings against those involved.
Commercial

Why Litigation Funding is Surging in Popularity in India

Third party funding is taking off in India, thanks in part to a robust construction and infrastructure sector that is asset and debt-heavy, yet encumbered with the prospect of litigation. As reported by CNBC, there is no statutory bar on litigation funding in India. In fact, amendments to Order XXV, Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, have established that courts have the power to secure costs from litigation funders by asking them to become a party and meeting a costs order. And The Supreme Court of India has already ruled that litigation funding does not violate the age-old tort of champerty. Recently, large conglomerates in the infrastructure and EPC sector have been engaging with third party funders. Distressed debt is a major factor for these companies, as is a recent court ruling which makes it easier for creditors to pursue defaulters in insolvency litigation once they have secured an adverse court/arbitration order. This ruling is forcing EPC companies to try to resolve litigation much sooner than they otherwise would, and that is prompting their inviting litigation funders into the mix. Hindustan Construction Company Limited and Patel Engineering Limited are two prime examples. Both are pursuing claims against government-backed entities, so there is the added security that the defendants are solvent and credit-worthy and will eventually fulfill any payment obligation. In each of these examples, the litigants have structured their funding agreements as assignments of the claims themselves to the litigation funder. It's worth noting, however, that the funders in these cases are investment firms BlackRock and Eight Capital. We have yet to see how dedicated litigation funders may structure an agreement or partake in the Indian funding market. That said, the very fact that funding is taking off in India makes the world's second most populous nation one to watch where litigation funding is concerned.
Commercial

Southern Response Wants to Avoid Paying Claims Funding Australia in Settlement

New Zealand government insurer Southern Response wants to eschew a Court of Appeals order that  a portion of its settlement go to litigation funder Claims Funding Australia. Maurice Blackburn and Claims Funding took over representation for 3,000 claimants after a New Zealand court allowed an opt-out class action for only the second time in history. Southern Response is weighing an appeal to the decision, preferring to deal with the claimant pool directly. As reported in Share Chat, in 2012, Southern Response took over claims on policies written by failed insurance company AMI. The court allowed some 3,000 claimants to engage in an opt-out action, thereby including all potential claimants in the action unless they specifically opt out. The claim is being funded by Claims Funding Australia, and Southern Response is challenging the funder's ability to collect on its portion of any settlement in the case. Currently, the government insurer is dealing with a separate action - also in the Court of Appeal - and wants to address this action once the other has concluded. Maurice Blackburn and GCA lawyers - both representing the claimant pool - have said they plan to negotiate with Southern Response, but are taking the position that the insurer has no business eschewing the opt-out order from the court.