John Freund's Posts

3076 Articles

Taking a Look at Recent Mass Torts Settlements

By John Freund |

In a panel titled “Getting Paid: A Breakdown of Recent Settlements”, Max Doyle, Chief Strategy Officer at Consumer Attorney Marketing Group moderated a panel between Sam Dolce, Vice President at Milestone, Jennifer Hoekstra, Partner at Aylstock, Witkin, Kries & Overholtz, Michael London, Founding Partner, at Douglas & London, and Eamon Walsh, President of North America at Advoc8se.

Jennifer Hoekstra began the conversation by offering a broad overview of the mass torts space, the types of cases that make their way through the sector, and the various case durations spanning the rare rapid recovery on one end of the spectrum, and the decade-long battle royal on the other end.

Michael London commented on the 3M claim, where they faced a massive 10-figure judgement and just days later declared bankruptcy. He then mused about tobacco cases, how "if you want to make it onto the front page of the New York Times, you try tobacco cases. If you never want to get paid, you try tobacco cases."

London then recounted war stories around lifestyle products, including several pharmaceutical companies which settled claims there their drugs contained symptoms that were not listed on the label, mesh cases, firefighting foam cases, 3M cases, etc. "There's always going to be something. Wait, keep your powder dry, and don't chase the marketer. Just use the smell test and common sense test of what makes sense."

Sam Dolce represents Milestone, a claims administrator, which helps people get paid. He spoke to administrative duration, which occurs on the backend of a litigation, and can be as much as months or even years before the payments actually go out. Milestone streamlines those processes so everyone gets paid much faster. Many top tier mass torts firms have not optimized their settlement duration procedures, so they are missing out on efficiencies once the case concludes.

Eamon Walsh points out that funders should have a robust checklist which scores everything from origination to settlement administration. That gives way to a secondary market where you can trade things more easily, and also makes you feel bulletproof in the sense that when you get to the negotiating table, you aren't suffering from the Achilles heel of incomplete information.

Sam Dolce added that firms that take the time to build the payment infrastructure can maximize efficiencies on the backend. Law firms should have workflows built into their business the way any other business would, and funders should look to fund such law firms. Every law firm is a business, after all.

Jennifer Hoekstra added that the individual you may be speaking with when interacting with a law firm might not know all the details of a case, but the firm knows all the details (someone else at the firm can answer those questions), so don't get put off if the individual you're speaking with doesn't have all of the answers off-hand.

Michael London spoke to the 3M verdicts which saw 8-figure verdict after 8-figure verdict, which 3M kept fighting and losing. In other cases, the defendant can't write a check quickly enough, so it depends on the defendant and how much pressure you can put on them, and whether they are eager to reach a resolution or not.

London also noted that the Bayer Monsanto claim is a $10 billion liability that keeps getting bigger. Yet London noted he believes there may be a pause in Bayer paying out its claims. "At some point you've got to let that golden goose take a break from laying its eggs, and let that company stay alive."

Finally, Sam Dolce recommended that investors in the space look to the firms who are already succeeding and investigate what is working for them. Don't make the mistake of looking at the aggregate payouts - some firms get very large checks while others do not. Understand what separates the most talented firms from those in the second and third tiers.

Jennifer Hoekstra echoed that sentiment. "I keep my ear to the ground on projects I don't work on. I look at everything across the board, even if we're not involved with it." Looking at cases that aren't moving forward towards a rapid settlement can give you an idea of what types of cases aren't working. If timelines and milestones aren't being met, then defendants won't feel pressured to reach settlements.

In other words, do your homework before embarking on investment within this very complex sector.

How Wall Street Money is Impacting the Mass Torts Sector

By John Freund |

Day one of this year’s LF Dealmakers event featured an entire day focused on one of the most prominent legal sectors within the litigation funding sphere: Mass Torts.

In the keynote session, titled “Mass Torts at a Crossroads: Is Wall Street Money a Catalyst or Complication?”, Seth Meyer, Managing Partner at Meyer Law Firm moderated a discussion between Steven Weisbrot, CEO of Angeion, and Harris Pogust, Founding Partner of Pogust Goodhead.

The conversation focused on Wall Street money’s impact on the litigation funding sector. The key question being if the influx of capital is a catalyst or complication.

Harris Pogust began the conversation by stating that there is no clear answer to that question. Many lives have been changed for the better thanks to the emergence of mass torts funding. That said, there are simply too many plaintiffs, and those plaintiffs that do get money aren’t seeing enough of it. “When I have to call some family whose family member died of cancer, and they’re supposed to get $100,000, but after attorney fees and all the other fees, they’re only getting $30,000, that makes me puke. That’s not what I got into this industry.”

While Steven Weisbrot does agree that the quantity of damages often isn’t reflected in what is deserved, he places the blame on access to capital, and the lack of optimization around bringing these types of cases in a more efficient manner. “I think capital really helps where you have a hard-to-reach target audience, whether they’re incarcerated or in geographically disparate locations. But we can’t just have attorneys settling saying ‘give me $1.2 billion and I’ll carve it up as I see fit.’”

Ultimately, there are four groups here: investors, funders, law firms and clients. Unfortunately, the people getting hurt the most are the clients. All other parties seem to be doing well. “There are firms that take $10 million and aggregate cases, and they make millions of dollars and they are happy,” explains Pogust, “but I’m a trial lawyer, not a businessman. I want to try good cases, not just make money.”

Pogust wants to see Wall Street be more careful with whom they give money to, so they don’t bring garbage cases and give the sector a black eye.

Wiesbrot agrees that vetting the firm and understanding their communication strategy is key. Also understanding if their strategy is about litigating vs. just aggregating. “Nurturing those relationships means less client attrition, and it’s also good because I can’t tell you how many random pieces of evidence have come out of those conversations. It’s good to hear from your clients directly about their experiences.”

In the end, Pogust was proven correct, in that no clear answer to the question of whether Wall Street money is a net positive or negative emerged. One can make a case either way, and as mass torts funding continues to accelerate in the coming years, it is doubtless this debate will continue on.

LCM Releases Full Year Audited Results for the Year Ended 30 June 2024

By Harry Moran |

Litigation Capital Management (LCM) has released its full year audited results for the year ended 30 June 2024.

Highlights

  • Net realised gains of A$32.2m (FY23: A$51.5m), with concluded case investments generating a 2.4x multiple of cash invested (MOIC)
  • Total income of A$44.7m (FY23: A$67.7m)
  • Profit after tax for the period of A$12.7m (FY23: A$31.5m)
  • Dividend of 1.25p (FY23: 2.25p)
  • Net assets of A$188.9m (FY23: A$183.5m) with cases conservatively valued at 1.9x cash invested
  • Book value per share of 94.4 pence (FY23: 90.3 pence)
  • Total new commitments of A$279m added in the period (FY23: A$176m)
  • Fund I which comprises US$150m of external capital is fully committed and Fund II which comprises US$291m of external capital is 58% committed
  • Share buyback program is 70% complete and remains ongoing

Strategic Update

  • The Company is continuing its transition to asset management. Fund III marketing to commence towards the end of 2024 calendar year
  • Preparing a disciplined and staged entry into the US market. 
  • Acquired the intellectual property of a cutting edge legal finance Big Data/AI platform. Application of this technology to form part of US market entry and drive enhanced origination and investment diligence more broadly across the Company

Commenting on the results, Patrick Moloney, CEO of Litigation Capital Management, said: "We are pleased to have extended our industry-leading track record with successful case outcomes over the past 12 months driving our 13-year investment performance to an impressive 2.9x multiple of invested capital. Our transition from balance sheet funder to high return asset manager is progressing well, and we are looking forward to engaging with our LP investor base as we commence marketing for Fund III.

"With our London operations firmly established, having generated realisations of over £100m at a MOIC exceeding 3x, we are now strategically preparing for a disciplined and staged entry into the US market. As part of this strategic initiative, we've recently acquired the IP of a leading legal finance Big Data/AI platform. We see substantial opportunities to leverage this technology across our business in an asset class that is ideally suited for such innovation."

The full result announcement and audited results can be read here.

Read More

Bay Point Closes $50 Million Capital Raise for Legal Investment Fund

By Harry Moran |

Bay Point Advisors LLC, an Atlanta-based investment firm with a focus in niche private markets, is proud to announce the successful close of a $50 million capital raise for Bay Point Legal Fund II. This raise demonstrates Bay Point’s commitment to providing innovative investment solutions in the litigation finance sector.

The newly raised capital will be deployed to identify, invest, and support allocations across several litigation strategies, including primary and secondary mass tort acquisition, mass arbitrations, and single event cases.

“This marks a significant milestone in our 12-year journey. Bay Point Legal Fund II advances our initial vision for the firm of offering uncorrelated investment opportunities. We are excited to leverage our team’s expertise in litigation finance to continue our growth trajectory and deliver value for our investors,” said Charles Andros, President and Chief Investment Officer at Bay Point Advisors.

Bay Point Legal has a team of experienced professionals who possess deep expertise in legal, financial, and operational aspects of litigation finance. Bay Point believes that its investment approach and extensive network enable the firm to identify and capitalize on high-value opportunities.

Sean Coleman, Managing Director of Bay Point’s Legal Finance strategy, stated, “We are excited about the closing of Bay Point Legal Fund II. We have substantial capital to make an impact in the quickly evolving litigation finance vertical. Fund II will build on the creative and diversified, equity-type, mass tort investments made in Fund I while also expanding into new investment opportunities such as hybrid torts, abuse cases, mass arbitrations and single events. The fund has the potential to provide returns uncorrelated to equity markets, while also helping deliver equitable compensation to claimants who previously had limited avenues to justice.”

About Bay Point Advisors:

Founded in 2012 and headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, Bay Point Advisors is a privately held investment firm with a strategic focus on niche markets often underserved by traditional financial institutions. Bay Point’s broad investment criteria allows for a dynamic response to market shifts. Committed to meeting the evolving needs of clients, Bay Point specializes in the prompt delivery of tailor-made capital.

About Bay Point Legal:

Bay Point Legal is the litigation finance arm of Bay Point Advisors. Specializing in equity investments in mass torts, single events, and mass arbitrations, the fund is dedicated to providing solutions that deliver strong returns while making a positive impact on the lives of those affected by corporate negligence. The legal fund leverages extensive industry experience and a robust network to identify, invest, and manage risk-adjusted investments in litigation finance.

Read More

AALF Welcomes Three New Associate Members

By Harry Moran |

In a series of posts on LinkedIn over the last week, The Association of Litigation Funders of Australia (AALF) announced that it has welcomed Ebury, Sedgwick, and Sapere as its newest Associate Members. With the addition of these three new members, AALF now boasts a total of 18 Associate Members in addition to its eight Funder Members.

On September 12, AALF welcomed Ebury as an Associate Member. The global fin-tech company specialises in international payments, collections and foreign exchange services. As part of its global network of 31 offices in 21 countries, Ebury Australia’s domestic footprint includes operations in Brisbane, Sydney, Melbourne and Perth. More information about Ebury can be found on its website.  

On September 14, AALF then welcomed Sedgwick as an Associate Member. A global provider of technology-enabled risk, benefits and integrated business solutions, Sedgwick’s range of solutions interact with the litigation funding market primarily through its claims administration services and expert witness/litigation services for class actions, mass torts and commercial disputes. Sedgwick’s presence in Australia includes offices in Sydney, Brisbane, Darwin, Melbourne, Adelaide, Canberra, Hobart and Perth. More information about Sedgwick can be found on its website

Finally, on September 16, AALF welcomed Sapere as its newest Associate Member. Sapere is one of the largest expert consulting firms in Australia and provides independent economic, forensic accounting and public policy services. In the world of litigation funding, Sapere offers expert witness and forensic accounting services to corporate clients, major law firms, government agencies, and regulatory bodies. Sapere has offices in Melbourne, Sydney, Canberra, Perth, and Brisbane, as well as two offices in New Zealand. More information about Sapere can be found on its website

A full list of AALF’s funder members and associate members can be found here.

DOJ “Actively Considering” Filing a Statement of Interest in Burford Capital’s $16B Argentina Case

By Harry Moran |

In the world of litigation funding cases with geopolitical implications, there can be few more significant than the ongoing dispute between Burford Capital and Argentina over the enforcement and collection of the $16 billion YPF award.

An article in the Buenos Aires Times covers the news that the United States Department of Justice sent a letter to US District Judge Loretta Preska asking the Manhattan court to delay ruling on Burford Capital’s request for the court to order Argentina to turn over its 51% interest in YPF. The reason for this requested delay, is that the US government is “actively considering whether to file a Statement of Interest with respect to the pending motion for an injunction and turnover.”

In the letter sent by the US Attorney for the Southern District of New York, Damian Williams, the DOJ said that it “respectfully requests that the Court reserve decision on the pending motion for an injunction and turnover until the United States has had an opportunity to submit any such statement of interest.” The letter explained that it will be in a position to inform the court whether it does intend to file a Statement of Interest, and submit this statement, no later than November 6, 2024. 

Whilst this may seem like a prolonged period for the government to be considering whether to file the statement, the DOJ explained that its process for making a decision on this “involves coordination among interested government agencies and the approval of the U.S. Department of Justice through the Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Division.”

The full DOJ letter can be read here.

Analysing the Litigation Finance Marketplace

By Harry Moran |

The contentious debate over future regulation of the litigation finance market tends to primarily focus on the impact of outside funding on the legal system or on individual cases, a new academic paper looks at the issue through a broader lens, arguing that ‘litigation finance generally promotes marketplace efficiency and should be encouraged.’

In a forthcoming paper for the Southern California Law Review, Suneal Bedi and William Marra provide a new outlook on the debate over the regulation of third-party litigation funding. Bedi and Marra explain that their article ‘reframes the debate about litigation finance’, broadening the conversation from the effects of outside capital of the legal system, to an examination of ‘how litigation finance affects competition not only in the courtroom but also in the marketplace’.

The authors centre their analysis around the business concept of “non-market strategies”, looking at how funding is used by companies outside of the courthouse to ‘access the capital markets and gain an advantage in the marketplace’. Bedi and Marra emphasises that whilst their non-market strategy analysis is focused on litigation finance within this paper, ‘it holds the promise to reframe the debate around legal issues far beyond the realm of litigation funding.’

Through this analysis, Bedi and Marra argue that proposed regulation of third-party funding will go beyond the courthouse and affect the capital markets as well, ‘with significant but unexplored implications for contemporary debates about funding.’ They go further and argue that regulating the litigation finance market ‘is especially likely to harm small and medium-sized enterprises’, as these are the companies relying on third-party funding for capital raises.

The full article can be read here.

Suneal Bedi is an associate professor at Indiana University’s Kelley School of Business. William Marra is a director at Certum Group and lectures at the University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School.

Bryant Park Capital Secures $100 Million in Capital for Deminor

By Harry Moran |

Bryant Park Capital (“BPC”), announced today that Deminor Recovery Services (“Deminor”), a leading privately-owned global litigation funder, recently closed on an approximately $100,000,000 committed senior credit facility and asset-backed financing with two leading U.S. based asset managers focused on the legal assets industry.

BPC, a leading US-based middle market investment bank, served as the exclusive financial advisor to Deminor in connection with this transaction.

“Bryant Park Capital’s extensive knowledge of the financing markets, combined with their strong relationships and creative structuring capability have been invaluable and helped us complete this complex set of transactions that we believe will be transformative for our clients, employees and shareholders, reflecting how our business model and international footprint has expanded since our first external capital raise in 2021. Significantly, these investments, made on Deminor’s own balance sheet, will continue to enable Deminor to deliver fast decision-making and flexible funding terms, with final investment decisions resting with our Investment Committee. Bryant Park Capital has been an excellent partner for us and we greatly appreciate BPC’s guidance and support throughout the process,” said Erik Bomans – CEO, Deminor.

Commenting on Deminor’s platform and performance, Joel Magerman, Bryant Park Capital’s Managing Partner added, “Deminor has generated significant returns extending through multiple market cycles as a leading player in the litigation funding sector, and this capital raise will provide an opportunity to significantly expand the operating leverage of the Deminor platform internationally.

About Deminor

Founded in 1990, Deminor is a leading privately-owned global litigation funder with 9 offices across continental Europe, London, New York, and Hong Kong.

Deminor has funded cases across four continents and 22 jurisdictions spanning 18 case categories as a leader in investment recovery, anti-trust, collective consumer, and commercial tort across 25 industries.

For more information about Deminor, please visit www.deminor.com.

Read More

Travis Lenkner Rejoins Burford Capital in Newly Created Chief Development Officer Role

By Harry Moran |

Burford Capital, the leading global finance and asset management firm focused on law, today announces that Travis Lenkner has rejoined the company as a member of its Management Committee in the newly created role of Chief Development Officer.

Based in London, Mr. Lenkner is focused on Burford’s future and its ongoing transformation of the legal industry. His responsibilities involve identifying and executing strategic initiatives that drive growth and align with the company’s long-term objectives, and his areas of focus include law firm equity investments, the alternative delivery of legal services to corporate and individual clients, and legal tech, including AI.

Mr. Lenkner is a longtime global leader in the legal finance market, including as a launch partner of Gerchen Keller Capital, which Burford acquired in 2016. More recently, he co-founded and was Managing Partner of Keller Lenkner LLC; he also co-founded and was a Director of the firm’s European counterpart. In addition, he was Senior Counsel at The Boeing Company and a litigation and appellate attorney at Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP. Mr. Lenkner was also a clerk for Justice Anthony M. Kennedy at the Supreme Court of the United States.

Christopher Bogart, CEO of Burford Capital, says: “We are pleased to welcome Travis Lenkner back as a member of the Management Committee in the newly created role of Chief Development Officer, where he will be focused on the continued growth of Burford’s business. Travis has had a tremendous impact as a leader in law and legal finance, which includes the impact he made while previously at Burford. The legal field is generally slow to change but Burford remains committed to being at the forefront of its modernization, including changes related to equity investments in law firms and new technology such as AI. As a seasoned executive who has spent much of his career in legal finance, Travis shares Burford’s commitment to advancing the business of law, and we at Burford welcome his leadership and unique perspective as our business continues to grow.”

About Burford Capital

Burford Capital is the leading global finance and asset management firm focused on law. Its businesses include litigation finance and risk management, asset recovery and a wide range of legal finance and advisory activities. Burford is publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE: BUR) and the London Stock Exchange (LSE: BUR), and it works with companies and law firms around the world from its offices in New York, London, Chicago, Washington, DC, Singapore, Dubai and Hong Kong.

For more information, please visit www.burfordcapital.com.

Read More

Nera Capital secures £20m Funding Line from Fintex Capital

Nera Capital, a pioneering specialist funding provider to law firms, is pleased to announce a new strategic partnership with Fintex Capital, the innovative investment firm dedicated to private debt. As part of this partnership, Nera secured an initial £20 million investment from Fintex.

The demand for law firm financing is growing quickly, as more and more consumers look for redress from hidden commissions on car financing to housing disrepair. The new funding line will allow more consumers to have access to the justice they deserve as the financial barriers are diminished.

The partnership marks a significant milestone for both companies. It expands Nera Capital’s reach, diversifies its funding sources and enables it to bring the benefits of capital and expertise to a wider set of consumers. For Fintex, this is another landmark transaction, the 3rd UK funding line of c. £20 million. This investment was fully funded by Fintex Capital’s flagship fund, Fintex Private Debt.

Aisling Byrne, Director of Nera Capital, said: “Fintex Capital’s investment enables the firm to accelerate its growth trajectory, further scaling its operations to provide crucial financial support to clients when they need it most. Along with being better positioned to ensure justice remains accessible, even against the most formidable adversaries, the additional funding line increases Nera Capital’s diversification.

The Fintex investment strengthens Nera’s financial base, diversifies our funding sources and allows us to explore new avenues in our market. It also enables us to scale our robust platform. We are pleased that our operations were once again endorsed by a prominent institutional investor.

Fintex made an excellent name for itself as a sophisticated, reliable lender in the UK and beyond. The Fintex team led by Sophie Batoua were a pleasure to deal with and the transaction was successfully executed in record time.”

Robert Stafler, CEO of Fintex Capital, said: “It comes as no surprise that demand for law firm finance is on the rise. This granular, insurance-backed financing provides vital funding to consumers when they need it most. It enables them and their lawyers to bring justice to families who without Nera’s support would be unable to seek redress.

Nera has a strong track record in its market, having successfully provided c. £200m in funding for UK consumer claims to date. We are delighted to see that our investment helps Nera solidify its position as a leader in its field. To us, this is just the beginning of a successful long-term partnership.”

Advisors: Nera Capital was advised by Walker Morris LLP, Mason Hayes & Curran LLP, and Copsey Murray Chartered Accountants. Fintex Capital was advised by Fox Williams LLP and Mason Hayes & Curran LLP

-ENDS-About Nera Capital: Established in 2011, Nera Capital is a specialist litigation funding provider with a presence in Manchester, Dublin, and The Netherlands. The firm is dedicated to supporting law firms and providing the financial resources necessary to pursue justice in both their Consumer and Commercial divisions.

Fintex Capital: (www.fintexcap.com) is a pioneering investment firm specialising in private debt. Since its inception, the firm has provided close to £400 million in private debt capital to borrowers across Specialty Finance and Real Estate Debt. Fintex is known for providing senior and mezzanine debt facilities to lending businesses in the UK and beyond; it also provides direct lending to asset-backed businesses and asset owners. The firm manages discretionary investment funds, as well as segregated managed accounts for various institutions.

Read More

Burford Capital Celebrates its 15th Anniversary

Today marks the 15th anniversary of the founding of Burford Capital, the leading global finance and asset management firm focused on law. In just 15 years, Burford has gone from a single $130 million investment fund to a $7.4 billion industry leader – with a 27x increase in its market capitalization.

Burford is fortunate to have a deep and continually growing bench of talented professionals from the world’s leading law firms and companies; we report below on the latest additions to the Burford team.

In recognition of that strong bench and a continued focus on our clients, Burford is today appointing Aviva Will, currently Co-Chief Operating Officer, as President. In her new role, Ms. Will’s focus will be predominantly on high-value, client-facing activities as we continue to expand our global relationships and the business evolves yet more towards complex financings with sophisticated corporate counterparties.

Burford is similarly appointing David Perla, also currently Co-Chief Operating Officer, into a new market-facing role of Vice Chair, focusing globally on Marketing, Public Policy, Industry Affairs and Public Relations, drawing on Mr. Perla’s experience and relationships in past leadership roles, including as President of Bloomberg Law.

Christopher Bogart, CEO of Burford Capital, says: “It should come as no surprise that Burford Capital continues to not only grow talent from within, but also to attract experienced senior professionals. In our 15th year, my co-founder Jon Molot and I are incredibly proud of Burford’s successes and its extraordinary people. Jon and I are just as committed today as we were on day one to redefining and advancing the business of law.”

Burford has also recently added a number of senior professionals from top global corporations and law firms, including:

Andrew Farthing as a Director in Texas, responsible for managing matters in Burford’s US portfolio. Prior to joining Burford, Mr. Farthing was a Director at Apple and previously a senior litigator at Latham & Watkins.

Carrie Tendler as Special Counsel in New York, responsible for advising on the enforcement of judgments in cases backed by Burford with a particular focus on the YPF matter. Prior to joining Burford, Ms. Tendler was a Partner at Kobre & Kim and a litigator at Cravath, Swaine & Moore.

Josh Reed as Senior Vice President in Chicago, responsible for managing matters in Burford’s patent portfolio. Prior to joining Burford, Mr. Reed was Head of Global Litigation at the Sisvel Group and Chief IP Counsel at Allscripts.

Kate Tellez as Senior Vice President in Chicago, responsible for assessing and underwriting legal risk as part of Burford’s patent group. Prior to joining Burford, Ms. Tellez was a Partner at Steptoe.

Florencia Villaggi as Vice President in New York, responsible for assessing and underwriting legal risk in investor-state and international commercial arbitration. Prior to joining Burford, Ms. Villaggi was Counsel at Herbert Smith Freehills.

Josh Wood as Head of Investor Relations in New York, with responsibility for directing Burford’s investor relations activities. Prior to joining Burford, Mr. Wood was Head of Shareholder Relations at Patria Investments and previously Vice President at Carlyle.

Nicholas Sinigaglia has joined as Global Controller in New York as a key member of the finance management team. Prior to joining Burford, Mr. Sinigaglia was Chief Accounting Officer at Pie Insurance.

About Burford Capital

Burford Capital is the leading global finance and asset management firm focused on law. Its businesses include litigation finance and risk management, asset recovery and a wide range of legal finance and advisory activities. Burford is publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE: BUR) and the London Stock Exchange (LSE: BUR), and it works with companies and law firms around the world from its offices in New York, London, Chicago, Washington, DC, Singapore, Dubai and Hong Kong.

For more information, please visit www.burfordcapital.com.

Read More

Optimise Launches New Product for Sub 100k Insolvency Claims

Optimise - the insolvency litigation and financing business launched by Provenio Litigation LLP earlier this year - has launched a new solution specialising in claims below £100,000.

Optimise financially supports the work of insolvency practitioners to make the best possible recoveries for the creditor estates.  The liquidator or administrator receives an upfront payment and an agreed percentage of the final recovery on the claim. 

The business is currently funding around £10 million worth of live claims.

While the majority of Optimise’s claims against former directors are valued between £100,000 and £1 million, Founder and Managing Director, Mark Goodwin says insolvency practitioners and lawyers have pointed to a lack of funding options for claims below £100,000.

To plug this gap, Optimise has launched a specialist product for lower value claims. This new solution is made possible by Optimise's unique partnership with parent company and law firm, Provenio, and established arrangements with a leading litigation funder, enabling flexible management of legal costs.

“With our flexible approach, Optimise can consider high-value insolvency claims as well as those valued at circa £75,000 and above, which may be overlooked or deemed too small by traditional funders,” explained Mark. “In a market traditionally dominated by one supplier, we believe this area of work has been overlooked. 

“Optimise is being utilised for a wide range of insolvency litigation related claims including overdrawn directors’ loan accounts, breach of contract, breach of duty, transactions at undervalue, preferences, unlawful dividends, wrongful trading and claims against third parties.”

Spanish Funder Claimbnb Hires Second Investment Director

Whilst the Spanish litigation finance market is rarely highlighted as an active jurisdiction for third-party funding, it is clear that there is a nascent market that is attracting both investment and experienced professionals looking to explore the opportunities.

An article in elEconomista covers the news that Juan Sebastián Montijano-Carbonell has joined Claimbnb as an investment director. Montijano-Carbonell joins the Spanish litigation funder from AltamarCam Partners where he served as executive director for the past two years, having previously spent nearly a decade in Credit Suisse’s investment banking team for Iberia.

In a post on LinkedIn, Fernando De Castro de Miguel, a member of Claimbnb’s investment committee, welcomed Montijano-Carbonell to the team and said that his experience will expand the firm’s value proposition to the litigation finance and legal assets market. Montijano-Carbonell will bolster Claimbnb’s investment expertise, working alongside the funder’s existing investment director, Victor Lobo. As LFJ reported in April 2024, this appointment builds upon Claimbnb’s expansion with the opening of an office in Madrid whilst the firm was conducting its third fundraising round. According to that previous announcement from the funder, Claimbnb had already investment in more than 30 opportunities with a total value of more than €150 million.

Law In Order Introduces Ground-Breaking eBundle Solution, Powered by Lexel’s GenAI Technology

Law In Order, the leading provider of comprehensive document and digital solutions for the legal industry and government, is proud to announce the launch of its latest eBundle solution, utilising Lexel’s latest innovation GenAI technology. This revolutionary integration marks a significant advancement in legal technology, offering enhanced efficiency, intelligence, and collaboration for legal professionals across Australia, Asia, and the Middle East.

The new eBundle solution harnesses the power of Lexel’s GenAI capabilities to streamline evidence management and digital bundle preparation for eHearings. GenAI brings advanced generative AI functionality that provides deep contextual intelligence on case materials, enabling lawyers and legal teams to process and analyse evidence faster, with greater accuracy and insight.

For nearly a decade, Law In Order has worked closely with LegalCraft, the creators of Lexel, to bring unparalleled technology solutions to legal professionals. This new initiative further solidifies the partnership, as both companies strive to push the boundaries of what legal tech can achieve.

Rey Penalosa, Law In Order’s Head of eHearings: “The integration of Lexel’s GenAI into our eBundle solution is a game changer. We’re excited to offer our clients an ‘All in One, integrated’ tool that not only simplifies the preparation process but also enhances their ability to present cases with precision. This collaboration strengthens our commitment to delivering the most innovative legal technology solutions to the market.” 

Vamsi Madiraju, Chief Operating Officer at LegalCraft, added, “Australia has always embraced Lexel technology, and it’s the perfect market for us to launch GenAI. Law In Order has been an integral partner for us in this journey, and we are thrilled to collaborate with them on this exciting new offering. The integration of GenAI into Law In Order’s eBundle solution will empower legal teams with unprecedented capabilities.”

About Law In Order 

Law In Order is a leading provider of end-to-end document and digital solutions, specialising in document production, eDiscovery management, and specialist court services. With a strong focus on innovation, the company is dedicated to empowering legal professionals with the tools and expertise they need to excel.

About LegalCraft 

LegalCraft is the creator of Lexel, a leading evidence management platform used by legal professionals globally. Lexel’s GenAI capabilities enhance legal workflows by providing AI-driven contextual intelligence on case materials, improving efficiency and accuracy in evidence management.

Read More

SEC Sues Father and Son over Fraudulent Mass Tort Funding Scheme

Whilst litigation finance is now a mature and established industry, this does not stop rogue actors from engaging in fraudulent schemes to try and reap personal benefit at the expense of unwitting investors.

Reporting by Bloomberg Law provides details on a lawsuit brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) against a father and son in Florida who are accused of using a supposed litigation funding scheme to defraud investors out of $125,000. The lawsuit filed last Friday alleges that Michael Chhabra and Vineet “Vincent” Chhabra set up Tort Fund LLC in April 2019, claiming that the company would provide litigation finance to law firms, when in reality the pair used it as a personal fund for their own legal fees and miscellaneous expenses.

The SEC’s suit, which was filed in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, claims that Tort Fund LLC’s owners had advertised the fund as a way for investors to support mass tort cases being brought against medical device and household product manufacturers, but did not enter into any funding agreements with law firms to do so. The $125,000 raised was then used to cover legal costs in Michael Chhabra’s own bankruptcy proceedings, paying for the pair’s personal expenses, with around $40,000 spent on maintaining the fraudulent scheme by paying individuals who solicited new investors. 

In its lawsuit, the SEC is asking the court to impose civil penalties and pay out the profits from the scheme, and to prohibit the pair from running any companies that have a class of securities registered in the future. The SEC’s filing can be read here.

Dutch Supreme Court Denies Sulu Heirs’ Appeal to Enforce Arbitration Award

The long-running dispute between Malaysia and the heirs to the Sultanate of Sulu has been one of the most high-profile cases in recent years, and one that has generated plenty of debate about the role of litigation funders in legal proceedings targeting national governments. A new development in the dispute has seen the Sulu heirs receive yet another unfavourable judgement, with potentially negative implications for their litigation funder, Therium Capital Management.

Articles in Bloomberg Law and Solicitors Journal covers last week’s ruling from the Supreme Court of the Netherlands, which dismissed the Sulu heirs’ appeal to enforce the disputed arbitration award given out by arbitrator Dr. Gonzalo Stampa in Paris. As a result of the Dutch Court’s ruling, the Sulu claimants will now have to cover the legal costs for the appeal and have lost the opportunity to enforce the award by seizing Malyasian assets in that jurisdiction. The finality of this ruling represents a blow to Therium, which invested $20 million in the Sulu heirs’ claim.

Azalina Othman Said, minister in the Malaysian Prime Minister’s Department (Law and Institutional Reform), stated: “Malaysia welcomes this landmark ruling as a momentous victory for the rule of law, representing a further step towards the end of the Sulu case and the preservation of the sanctity of international arbitration as an alternative form of dispute resolution.”

Therium did not respond to Bloomberg Law’s request for comment at the time of publication.

Aperture Investors Hires Luke Darkow to Launch Litigation Finance Strategy 

Aperture Investors, an alternative asset manager and part of the Generali Investments platform, today announced that Luke Darkow has joined the firm to lead its new private credit Litigation Finance strategy. 

Darkow joins Aperture from Victory Park Capital, a global alternative investment manager, where he was a Principal and Portfolio Manager responsible for sourcing, analyzing, executing, and managing investments within the litigation finance asset class. Prior to Victory Park Capital, Darkow held roles at TPG Capital and Morgan Stanley. 

"With Aperture entering its next phase of growth, we see significant potential in specialty lending, particularly in litigation finance, which we believe remains a relatively underbanked asset class. Estimates suggest that the litigation finance market could double annually through 2035," said Peter Kraus, Chief Executive Officer and Founder, Aperture Investors. “Litigation Finance is a niche, relationship-driven sector—and Luke is no tourist. His expertise in both private and public debt investments, his deep network of law firms and legal service providers, and his ability to source opportunities and raise capital will allow us to build out this unique offering at Aperture.”

Litigation Finance involves the provision of third-party capital to help finance law firms or plaintiffs pursuing legal claims in exchange for, or collateralized by, a percentage of proceeds received upon the successful resolution of legal disputes. Aperture’s Litigation Finance strategy will primarily provide structured loans to law firms backed by expected legal fee receivables from procedurally mature, settled, and/or short duration legal cases, targeting uncorrelated returns.

“I’m incredibly pleased to join Aperture and help drive the firm into new opportunities in private credit with this niche, asset-based lending strategy,” commented Darkow. “As Aperture expands its slate of strategies and products, I’m also attracted to the intellectual horsepower and best-in-class infrastructure within the broader firm.” 

About Aperture Investors 

Aperture is an alternative asset management firm offering credit and equity strategies in commingled and bespoke portfolios for institutional investors. Aperture's mission is outperformance, and it is focused on identifying portfolio managers who it believes have a unique edge and can consistently deliver innovative, solutions-oriented investment results throughout market cycles. Since inception, Aperture has steadily grown its breadth of products, and as of August 31st, it manages approximately $4 billion. Its investment strategies are diversified across asset classes and geographies – each managed by a dedicated investment team – with distribution across North America, Europe, Middle East and Asia. 

Aperture Investors was founded in 2018 and is led by industry veteran Peter Kraus and by Generali, one of the largest global insurance and asset management providers. For more about Aperture, visit us at www.apertureinvestors.com.

Read More
Community Spotlights

Community Spotlight:  Danny Kinnear, Founder, EAKO Capital

By Danny Kinnear |

Danny Kinnear, founder of EAKO Capital, leverages his experience with top financial institutions like Deutsche Bank, Nomura, and Litigation Capital Management to offer innovative financial solutions to corporates, law firms, and funders.  EAKO partners with Google Ventures and Visa-backed entities, as well as major banks, to provide:

  • Rapid bank account setup (48-72 hours)
  • Diverse funding options (on both a recourse and non-recourse basis)
  • Competitive foreign exchange services (a demonstration of how much we can save you, look here)
  • Forward credit lines for risk management hedging purposes
  • FX options and structured solutions
  • Risk management consultancy to resolve complex situations – through our extensive network we can find solutions to most currency problems

Company Name and Description:   EAKO Capital helps law firms, companies, and asset managers access a range of funding and financial risk management solutions.

Company Website:  www.eakocapital.com

Year Founded:  2022

Headquarters:   Supporting clients globally out of London, United Kingdom

Area of Focus:  Comprehensive financial support through multi-currency accounts, currency and interest rate hedging, cross-border & mass payment solutions, and the provision of access to funding, including litigation finance.

Member Quote: “EAKO combines deep banking expertise with technology to deliver intelligent, cost-effective currency and funding solutions to business and asset managers operating internationally.”

Read More
Community Spotlights

Community Spotlight: Aaron Winston, Strategy Director, Express Legal Funding

By Aaron Winston |

Aaron Winston is an author and the Strategy Director at Express Legal Funding, bringing over a decade of experience in the consumer finance industry. In recent years, Aaron has risen to be recognized as an expert in SEO and law firm content marketing, being featured in multiple case studies.

Aaron leverages his deep understanding of digital strategies to enhance Express Legal Funding's online presence and brand authority with hundreds of thousands of unique website visitors annually. His approach combines analytical precision with creativity, making him a thought leader in the fields of pre-settlement funding and search engine marketing.

Company Name and Description: Express Legal Funding is a nationally recognized and trusted pre-settlement funding company and brand based in Plano, Texas, and is dedicated to providing fair, fast, and affordable financial support to claimants bringing personal injury and other tort claims.

Company Websitehttps://expresslegalfunding.com/

Year Founded:  2015

Headquarters:  5717 Legacy Drive, Suite 250, Plano, Texas 75024

Area of Focus: Pre-settlement Funding, SEO, Content Marketing, Law Firm Digital Marketing and Websites

Member Quote: Can a pre-settlement funding company really be a household name if most people aren't even aware the industry exists?

Read More

EU Stakeholder Survey Aims to Inform Litigation Finance Policy

By Tom Webster |

The following is a contributed piece by Tom Webster, Chief Commercial Officer at Sentry Funding.

An EU stakeholder survey is gathering practical information on the operation of third-party funding across the European Union. The study, ‘Mapping Third Party Litigation Funding (TPLF) in the European Union’, was given an extended deadline of 3 September 2024.

Conducted by Civic Consulting and the British Institute of International and Comparative Law (BIICL), the research will help the European Commission analyse the legal framework and practical operation of litigation funding in the EU and make policy decisions in the area.

The survey seeks views from stakeholders with experience of third-party funding, including funders, lawyers, consumer organisations, other businesses, public authorities, members of the judiciary and others. As well as questions seeking to discover the extent of funding activity in each EU jurisdiction and typical levels of investment, it also asks for views on both positive and negative effects of litigation funding.

In relation to positive effects, the survey asks a number of questions including whether respondents have observed that current litigation funding practices lead to better access to the courts for parties who could not litigate without funding; whether there is a deterrent effect on companies that serve consumer markets due to the threat of mass claims relating to unsafe products or unfair practices; and whether respondents have seen a filtering effect on claims as those with a low chance of success will not be funded.

In relation to negative effects, questions include whether respondents have observed conflicts of interest; undue influence on decisions such as settlements and appeals; and the funding of frivolous claims.

The EU survey is just one of a number of projects currently examining the litigation funding sector. Also focusing on the EU market, the European Law Institute is undertaking a substantial research project with the aim of establishing a set of principles to identify the issues that should be taken into account when entering into litigation funding agreements.

Meanwhile in the UK, the Legal Services Board recently published a report on litigation funding in England and Wales (https://legalservicesboard.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/A-review-of-litigation-funding.pdf), and the Civil Justice Council has embarked on a wide-reaching review of the sector (https://www.judiciary.uk/related-offices-and-bodies/advisory-bodies/cjc/current-work/third-party-funding/) which will include recommendations in relation to the future regulation of the industry.

Read More
Community Spotlights

Community Spotlight: Michelle Silvers, Chief Executive Officer and Director, Court House Capital

By Michelle Silvers |

Michelle Silvers is Chief Executive Officer and a Director of Court House Capital and leads the company’s business strategy, growth and operations across geographic markets. She oversees stakeholder relations with capital investors and all decisions pertaining to the company’s investment portfolio.

Michelle is a highly-respected leader in litigation funding. She co-founded the litigation funding industry in Australia in 1999 and has over 30 years’ combined funding and legal experience across commercial dispute resolution, insolvency, insurance and collective redress (class actions).

Michelle has played a crucial role in funding more than 200 legal disputes and is passionate about structuring capital and risk management solutions for clients and helping claimants gain access to justice.

In 2019 Michelle joined Court House Capital, quickly establishing the business as a funder of choice in Australia and New Zealand. Previously, she served as Managing Director and CEO of Litigation Lending Services Limited, where she pioneered portfolio funding and grew the business to become one of the most successful funders in the region. Her career also includes senior roles at leading international funders (Augusta Ventures and IMF Bentham, now Omni Bridgeway), global insurance firms (AMP, FAI General, Lawcover) and private legal practice (DLA Piper).

Michelle is a co-founder and Director of the Association of Litigation Funders of Australia (AALF) and is a regular speaker and commentator on industry developments. She holds a Bachelor of Arts and Bachelor of Laws from the University of New South Wales and is a Director of Court House Capital Management Limited.

Company Name and Description: Court House Capital is a leading litigation funder focused on cases in Australia and New Zealand. Court House Capital was established with a mission to provide financial and strategic support to parties seeking capital, risk management and access to justice. Our team is led by industry founders, with Australian based capital, and is renowned for expertise, agility and collaboration.

Company Website: courthousecapital.com.au

Year Founded:  2019

Headquarters: Sydney

Area of Focus: Litigation Finance

Member Quote: We offer cost and risk mitigation strategies for commercial clients and ‘a level playing field’ for those who cannot afford to pursue justice themselves. It is an honour to be co-founders of an industry that provides access to justice for so many, and to be the funder of choice for claimants and professional advisers. Our financial resources, industry network and knowledge has helped many claimants achieve successful outcomes.

Read More

Colin Everson Joins Gallagher as Head of Litigation and Arbitration Risk

By Harry Moran |

In a post on LinkedIn, Colin Everson announced that he has joined the global insurance brokerage and risk management firm, Gallagher, as Head of Litigation and Arbitration Risk. Everson joins Gallagher from Kroll, where he served as managing director, having also spent over three years at Duff & Phelps as an associate managing director.

Gallagher’s dispute resolution insurance services cover a wide range of products including after-the-event insurance, capital protection insurance, judgment preservation insurance, and arbitration default insurance. As Everson highlighted in his announcement, Gallagher was ranked Band 1 in the Chambers & Partners guide for dispute resolution insurance brokers.

More information about Gallagher’s dispute resolution insurance practice can be found here.

Manolete Partners Announces Audited Results for the Year Ended 31 March 2024

By Harry Moran |

Manolete (AIM:MANO), the leading UK-listed insolvency litigation financing company, today announces its audited results for the year ended 31 March 2024. 

Steven Cooklin, Chief Executive Officer, commented: 

"These annual results show that Manolete has now recovered strongly from the UK Government's suppression of the UK insolvency sector that prevailed during the Covid period. The Company has returned to profitability and has continued its track record of consistent operational cash generation. That has been driven by a record number of 251 case completions in FY24.

The trading results for the new financial year, which commenced on 1 April 2024, clearly show that this positive momentum has continued: year to date, new case enquiries are running 22% ahead of FY24 and our in-house legal team has already completed 116 cases with an aggregate value of £11.8m (compared to this stage last year, where we had completed 93 cases for a total value of £6.3m). This is also reflected in our gross cash receipts where we have already collected £10.3m in the first five months of this financial year, compared to £8.7m for the whole six-month, first half period of the previous financial year.

"Widely reported, challenging, multiple, macro-economic factors including: high interest rates, persistent inflationary threats, stretched Government balance sheets and global conflicts, provide strong tailwinds and significant momentum for further growth. As the clear market leader in the UK insolvency litigation finance sector, the Company is exceptionally well positioned to take advantage of these conditions". 

Financial (statutory and non-statutory) highlights: 

  • Realised revenues on completed cases were £24.2m, a decrease of 10% (FY23: £26.8m) although FY23 included an exceptionally large, funded case completion of which £4.9m was recorded in realised revenue (total settlement £9.5m).
  • Adjusting for that single exceptional case, FY24 realised revenues were 11% higher than FY23. 
  • 92% of total revenues represented by realised revenues on fully completed cases (FY23: 129%). 
  • Increase in the valuation of the cartel cases contributed £0.1m to gross profit in FY24 (FY23: £1.2m). 
  • EBIT increased to £2.5m, which represented a positive change from an EBIT loss of £3.1m in the prior year. 
  • Gross cash receipts from completed cases were £17.7m, a decrease of 34% (FY23: £26.7m, however, FY23 included the same one-off exceptionally large case completion, referred to above, which delivered gross cash receipts of £9.5m. Excluding that case, gross cash receipts rose by 3%). 
  • The Company's retained share of gross cash receipts from completed cases (after all legal costs and payments to Insolvent Estates) was £10.8m, a decrease of 18% (FY23: £13.1m) but again, the only reason for the decrease was the £9.5m exceptional case in FY23. 
  • Cash generated from operations (after all completed case costs and all overheads but before new case investments and taxation) was £5.0m (FY23: £8.0m). 
  • As at 31 March 2024, the Company had cash balances of £1.4m and borrowings of £13.7m resulting in a net debt of £12.3m (FY23: £0.6m and £10.5m, respectively and therefore a net debt of £9.9m). 

Operational highlights: 

  • A record number of new case investments in UK insolvency cases, an increase of 18%: 311 in FY24 (FY23: 263). 
  • A record number of 251 cases were completed in FY24 (FY23: 193 cases), with an average duration per case of 13.2 months (FY23: 15.5 months), generating a Money Multiple of 1.9x (FY23: 1.9x) and an IRR of 131% (FY23: 131%) (based on unaudited internal management information). 
  • As previously reported, following the ending in April 2022 of the Covid-related emergency legislation to suppress UK insolvencies and the withdrawal of very substantial financial support to UK businesses by the previous Government, the number of UK insolvencies have been at record high levels. The first wave of these insolvencies has predominantly been the smaller and weaker "zombie" companies. Only in recent months have the larger company insolvencies, typically by way of Administration, returned to levels seen before the Covid pandemic. This has resulted in record high numbers of cases taken on by Manolete but the average case size is smaller than had been the case, pre-pandemic. By way of comparison: FY21 was the trading year that best reflects the completion values of cases acquired and funded before the Covid-19 impact (this is because, on average, cases take around 12 months to complete). In FY21, audited realised revenues were £24.4m from 135 cases: an average of £180k per case, which is close to double the average for FY24 of £96k. 
  • ROI of 116% and Money Multiple of 2.2x from 933 completed cases since inception (based on unaudited internal management information). 
  • Average case duration across the full lifetime portfolio of 933 completed cases is 12.7 months · 19% increase in live cases: 418 in process as at 31 March 2024 (351 as at 31 March 2023)

Current Trading 

  • The first five months of FY25 have been buoyant:
    • Highest ever number of new case enquiries year to date: 348 (FY24: 286). 
    • 103 new case investments, which is broadly tracking the record 146 new case investments for the whole first six months of FY24. 
    • 116 case completions at an aggregate value of £11.8m (FY24: 93 case completions at a total value of £6.3m). o Gross cash receipts from previously completed cases is £10.3m, compared to £8.7m for the whole first six months of FY24. 
    • Net cash receipts (after all payments to insolvent estates and all associated external legal costs) are £6.5m year to date for FY25, compared to £4.6m for the whole first six months of FY24. 

Outlook 

  • Given that the number of corporate insolvencies in the UK remain at record highs, the Company can look forward to a sustained period of growth. A strong recovery in the number of larger case investments signed in the second half of FY24 is also an encouraging indicator of future business strength.

A copy of the annual report and accounts will be available on the Company's website shortly and will be posted to shareholders in due course.

The full announcement and results can be read here.

Read More

Deminor Publishes Insights on AI and the Economics of Litigation Funding

Deminor has published a pair of articles into specific aspects of legal funding. The first, authored by senior legal counsel Patrick Rode, explores the topic of ‘AI in Litigation Funding in the Context of the EU AI Act’. The second, written by investment associate Aliki Halcoussi, covers ‘The Economics of Litigation Funding: Assessing the Financial Viability of Legal Dispute Investments’.

Rode’s article first examined the potential use cases for AI in litigation funding, including case evaluation and risk assessment, predictive analytics, automation of decision-making, and due diligence. Then, Rode provided an overview of the impact of the European Union’s AI Act which came into force this month, looking at the regulatory requirements that will be imposed on the use of AI systems.

Finally, Rode offered four potential strategies for funders to take a pro-active and strategic approach to dealing with comprehensive legislation, which included investing in compliance infrastructure, collaborating with leading AI experts, prioritising ethical AI systems development, and engaging in active discussions with EU regulators.

Halcoussi’s insights piece provided an overview of the ‘thorough and complex process’ through which funders are able to assess the viability of investing in individual claims or portfolios of cases. Halcoussi explained that funders like Deminor begin with rigorous data collection that can then be used to form a financial framework which can be used to ‘accurately calculate the relevant exogenous factors that might affect the recovery amount.’

The funder’s financial modeling also incorporates an analysis of the potential range of costs involved in that specific case, balancing it against legal budgets and the expected duration of the legal proceedings. In order to ensure that these investments are profitable for the funder, the level of risk must be balanced against the potential size of the recovered proceeds to calculate the funder’s required return.

Rode’s article can be read here. Halcouissi’s article can be read here.

HFW’s Restructuring and Insolvency Practice Hires Australian Litigation Funding Pioneers

By Harry Moran |

An announcement from HFW revealed that the law firm has made two hires in its corporate restructuring, insolvency and commercial litigation practice, with the appointment of partners Paul Buitendag and Rena Solomonidis in the firm’s Melbourne office. Both partners have joined HFW from Johnson Winter Slattery, bringing combined expertise in complex commercial disputes as well as experience in working with litigation funders.

Gavin Vallely, managing partner at HFW Australia, described Buitendag as “one of Australia’s preeminent insolvency and commercial litigation practitioners” and highlighted his renown for “litigation funding in Australia, including the introduction of ATE insurance as an alternative form of security for costs in litigation funding agreements.” Vallely praised Solomonidis as “a leading practitioner in commercial litigation, corporate insolvency and restructuring, as well as in prosecuting and defending class actions”, and noted that the pair “have worked with funders in the USA, UK and Australia in significant disputes.”

Buitendag highlighted HFW’s work in London as “an important centre not only for litigation funders, but also for brokers and insurers who are developing innovative, insurance-backed litigation funding products.” Whilst Solomonidis praised HFW’s “international reach”, which would be able to “support our practice at a time of increasing insolvency activity in Australia that regularly involves assets, investors and alternative lenders in offshore locations.”

FORIS AG Announces Settlement in Dispute Over Deutsche Bank’s Postbank Takeover

By Harry Moran |

Whilst third-party funding is less commonly seen within the various European Union jurisdictions, a landmark case in Germany that dates back to a 2010 takeover of Postbank has finally achieved a settlement according to the litigation funder that provided the financial backing for the claim.

An announcement from German litigation funder FORIS AG revealed that a settlement has been reached in the legal proceedings brought against Deutsche Bank related to the bank’s takeover of Postbank in 2010. FORIS had financed two claims that represented a total of 19 Postbank shareholders, and following the agreement with Deutsche Bank, all that remains is for the plaintiffs to decide whether or not to accept the settlement.

The claims which were first brought in 2017 focused on allegations that Postbank shareholders had been underpaid for their shares, when they were forced to accept 25 euros per share. The settlement provides for each shareholder in the claims to receive an additional payment of 31 euros per Postbank share they held at the time of the takeover, with the total value of the dispute estimated at around 4.5 million euros.

Dr. Anke Warlich, senior legal counsel at FORIS, said that the funder was pleased with Deutsche Bank’s willingness to settle and that there was already a high approval rate for the settlement amongst the shareholders whose claims FORIS has financed. Warlich emphasised that without third-party litigation funding, the risk and costs involved in pursuing such a claim would have meant that the injured parties would not have been able to take on these legal proceedings.

The plaintiffs in the claims were represented by the law firms AWARR.legal/Schirp &Partner and Nieding & Barth.

Irish Litigation Firm Signs €150M Funding Deal With European Investment Company

By Harry Moran |

Nera Capital’s groundbreaking partnership with a substantial European investment platform, is poised to significantly benefit the company’s consumer division. 

This latest success has come at a prosperous time for Nera Capital, which earlier this year expanded into Europe, opening an office in The Netherlands, adding to its locations in England and Ireland. 

Following its establishment in 2011, the company has become a pioneer in the legal finance industry. Nera Capital is a specialist funding provider to law firms across Europe and the US.  The firm has administered legal finance in numerous jurisdictions and assisted more than 200,000 claimants to date. 

Recently, Nera secured a sought after spot in the European Litigation Funders Association. Director of Nera Capital, Aisling Byrne, said: “This latest funding partner is a strategic advancement which will greatly enhance the services we provide to our clients and partners. 

“I am excited about the possibilities this funding line will unlock.” Ms Byrne called the deal a ‘significant milestone’ for the business.  She added: “Nera Capital continues to advocate for transparency and promoting higher industry standards. We assist financially vulnerable consumers, whilst maintaining exceptional returns for our investors and all stakeholders. 

“This newest collaboration allows us to enhance consumer access to justice, supporting equitable outcomes over time for more people.” 

Read More

NZ Court of Appeal Approves Opt-Out Class Action Against ANZ and ASB Banks

By Harry Moran |

When it comes to ensuring that litigation is effective in providing full access to justice for individuals, a key factor in class actions is often whether these claims are brought on an opt-in or opt-out basis. In the latest example of this important distinction being at stake, a New Zealand court has ruled that a large class action against two of the largest banks will be allowed to proceed as an opt-out claim.

Reporting by RNZ covers the news that a class action being brought against ANZ and ASB banks has been approved to be brought on an opt-out basis by the New Zealand Court of Appeal. The class action was first filed in 2021 over allegations that the banks breached their disclosure obligations under section 22 of the CCCFA, and failed to sufficiently refund customers’ interest payments and fees that the banks were not entitled to charge. The Court of Appeal’s decision to approve the opt-out proceedings means that the class action could end up representing up to 100,000 customers.

Scott Russell, managing director of Russell Legal and lawyer for the claimants, said that the ruling “not only removes a significant barrier for consumers who might have been unaware they had a right to participate, it means if we are successful, ANZ and ASB will be held liable for every eligible customer that was allegedly impacted when the banks breached New Zealand consumer protection laws.” The class action covers those who were customers of ASB Bank between 6 June 2015 and 18 June 2019, as well as ANZ Bank customers between 6 June 2015 - 28 May 2016, for loans entered into post 6 June 2015.

Whilst the latest article makes no mention of third-party funding, when the class action was filed in 2021, it was reported that the legal proceedings were being jointly funded by CASL and LPF. On the Banking Class Action website, both CASL and LPF are still listed as the funders for the class action.

ANZ provided the following statement in response to the ruling:

"The recent Court of Appeal hearing rejected the plaintiffs claim for a wider ANZ class and confirmed the High Court decision that the banking class action currently before the courts only includes ANZ customers who entered into a loan from 6 June 2015 and also received a loan variation letter that was affected by the calculator issue (i.e. received a letter containing incorrect information between 6 June 2015 and 28 May 2016).

"We have relevant records for customers who might be part of the class, which we will retain. There is no need to contact the bank at this stage. The Court will consider as part of the proceedings how and when to notify customers who are part of the class and who may have a claim."

Delaware Court Orders Full Disclosure of Class Action Funding Agreement

By Harry Moran |

Disclosure of litigation funding agreements has been one of the most contentious issues in recent years, particularly in the state of Delaware, where certain judges have focused on in questions of transparency. However, a class action in the state has produced one of the most interesting rulings of the year, as the court ordered the full disclosure of the funding agreement and suggested that the litigation funder may also be a competitor of the defendant.

An article in Reuters examines a case in the Court of Chancery for the State of Delaware, in which Vice Chancellor Nathan Cook ruled that plaintiffs in a class action must share their litigation funding agreement with the defendants. The class action at stake is a 2018 case brought against insurer Genworth Financial over allegations of fraudulent transfers that stripped assets from its long term care subsidiary, resulting in the company being unable to pay future claims and commissions to policyholders and insurance brokers. The August 21 ruling granted the defendants’ motion to compel the production of both the litigation funding agreement and the unredacted fee agreements.

Cook explained his ruling in part by emphasising that both the nature of class action lawsuits and the specific context of this case, “give rise to several unique concerns, including the potential for class counsel to face conflicts of interest and for the third-party funders to exercise improper control over the litigation”. Cook also highlighted that the language used in the funding agreement appeared to acknowledge that “the arrangement set forth within, will be disclosed in some fashion during litigation.”

Cook went on to refute the arguments made by the plaintiff’s lawyers that the funding agreement contained privileged or confidential information, stating: “I am confident that, in compelling production of the Funding Agreement, I am not requiring Plaintiffs to disclose meaningful opinion work product.” Referencing existing case law set down in the cases of Carlyle and Charge Injection, Cook concluded that “contrary to Plaintiffs’ assertion, it is not “well established” that, under Delaware law, “litigation funding agreements . . . are not discoverable.”” 

One of the most interesting elements of Cook’s ruling was that he appeared to infer that the nature of the unnamed litigation funder had raised concerns. Cook noted that the funders behind the Genworth class action “do not seem to be entities ordinarily involved in litigation funding”, going on to state that “they appear to be competitors financing litigation against a market peer.”

Express Legal Funding Launches LFAFF: New Trade Organization to Protect Consumers & Law Firms with Strategic Vendor Partnerships

By Harry Moran |

Express Legal Funding, a leading provider of pre-settlement funding services, proudly announces the establishment of the Legal Funders for Actually Fair Funding (LFAFF), a coalition dedicated to safeguarding consumers and law firms through strategic vendor partnerships and ethical pre-settlement funding practices.

A New Standard in Legal and Consumer Protection
LFAFF aims to redefine the legal funding industry by championing fairness, transparency, and inclusivity. This new trade organization is committed to ensuring that injured claimants, regardless of their background, can access the financial support they need to cover their living costs while pursuing justice, and law firms benefit from reliable, transparent vendors to accelerate their growth.

"At Express Legal Funding, our commitment has always been to support both our clients and the legal community with integrity," said Aaron Winston, Author and Strategy Director at Express Legal Funding. "With the launch of LFAFF, we're taking this commitment to the next level by establishing a trusted alliance that prioritizes ethical standards and transparency in all legal service industry vendor partnerships, reducing overhead expenses and protecting law firms from wasted SEO and marketing costs."

Core Objectives of LFAFF

  • Industry Best Practices (B2C): Implement a higher standard for pre-settlement funding, providing plaintiffs access to financial resources without compromising their legal claims.
  • Law Firm Support (B2B): Providing law firms with access to pre-vetted, trustworthy vendors to enhance their practice and client service, with potential discounts for member firms.
  • Ethical Standards and Transparency: Promoting high ethical standards across all vendor partnerships, ensuring that the legal funding industry remains accountable and trustworthy.

Membership and Benefits
Expanding beyond the pre-settlement funding industry, LFAFF is open to law firms and vendors who are committed to upholding the organization's ethical standards and guidelines. Members will benefit from a network of like-minded professionals, access to exclusive resources, and the opportunity to contribute to the ongoing development of industry best practices.

About Express Legal Funding
Express Legal Funding is a nationally recognized and trusted pre-settlement funding company and brand based in Plano, Texas. As a premier provider of pre-settlement funding, it's dedicated to offering plaintiffs the financial support they need while they await the resolution of their cases. The company is committed to ethical practices and transparency, ensuring that its clients receive fair and equitable services.

About LFAFF
The Legal Funders for Actually Fair Funding (LFAFF) is a trade organization founded by Express Legal Funding to promote ethical standards, consumer protection, and strategic partnerships in the legal funding industry. LFAFF is committed to fostering a fair and transparent environment for both law firms and the consumers they serve.

Read More