
The litigiousness of modern society cannot be denied. Now that so-called “nuclear” verdicts are more commonplace, insurance companies are raising premium prices to keep up. Dubbed “social inflation,” the ever-rising insurance costs are particularly impactful to property owners and real estate developers.
Some would say that the quickest way to be successful in business is to identify a need in the market—then find a way to fill that need. One person who took that advice to heart is Rebecca Berrebi, founder of a litigation funding consultancy firm that just opened.
Australia’s Litigation Finance community is in a state of flux, as new regulations are implemented, and industry players scramble to remain in compliance. Understanding litigation funding for companies in liquidation is essential in order to reap maximum benefits.
The launch of the International Legal Finance Association (ILFA) is a first-of-its-kind event. Burford Capital is the force behind this global organization, fueled by the exciting industry growth that has taken place in recent years. What can we expect from this newly formed entity?
At least six of the world’s most successful litigation finance entities are forming a global coalition called the International Legal Finance Association, or ILFA. Founding members include Burford Capital, Omni Bridgeway, Therium Capital Management, Harbour Litigation Funding, and Woodsford Litigation Funding. Also joining the association are Parabellum Capital, DE Shaw & Co, Nivalon AG, Fortress Investment Group, and Validity Finance.
Does a litigation funder have a vendetta against Queenstown mayor Jim Boult? That’s the contention after a reveal that Chris Meehan is connected to the funding of a case against Boult. The case alleges that Boult’s companies, Stonewood Homes and Holmfirth Group, traded while insolvent. Millions of dollars were lost, and investors want their money back. Meehan himself is involved in a few nearby developments, one of which is in Queenstown.
As new regulations for funders in Australia take effect, the Litigation Finance landscape enters a new era. In addition to the requirement that litigation funders hold a license and the new classification of funds as ‘managed funding schemes’, ASIC has issued some relief for funders.
It’s no secret that not everyone is a proponent of Litigation Finance. In Australia, new regulations threaten to permanently alter how class action suits are managed, and how litigation funding can be used to assist them. Andrew Saker of Omni Bridgeway, a major funder, is speaking out.
IP law is a vital part of the Litigation Finance landscape. Patent and intellectual property litigation are industry mainstays, and represent the most-funded legal sector. As such, changes in the IP ecosystem impact the Litigation Finance world as well.
The Judgement Fund is used by the Bureau of Fiscal Services to provide remuneration to plaintiffs who successfully sue the federal government of the US. This arm of the US Treasury Department has been given leave by the Supreme Court to use the fund to pay insurers.
Litigation Finance is deepening its presence in the shareholder class action scene—challenging businesses when those who invest in them lose money. HESTA, a health-industry-specific fund, is now funding 21 class-action suits representing shareholders.
Multinational companies are choosing international arbitration to settle disputes in greater numbers than ever. For those who make this choice, Litigation Finance can take the financial stress out of the ordeal. Third-party legal funding can be used commercially and internationally.
Current economic conditions are making it more challenging to run a business regardless of industry. In the legal world, budgets are shrinking and GCs, already stretched to the brink, are taking on even more costs. An ability to adapt to circumstances while finding ways to save money is of the essence.
The FCA or ‘False Claims Act’ has secured more than $3 billion in settlements or judgments in civil cases in the 2019 fiscal year alone. Much of that relates to healthcare claims, and nearly two-thirds involve relators—which is another term for whistleblowers. This is not surprising, given the widespread application of Qui Tam provisions that offer a portion of an award to whistleblowers who assist the prosecution with cases under the FCA.
At what point might a David become a Goliath? Some would say that Litigation Finance is the catalyst for such a transformation. Take the case of Akiane Kramarik and the famed portrait of Jesus she painted at age nine. Over the years, she’s been the subject of television appearances, media events, and even a big-budget film. But as she grew up, missing royalty payments and other shady dealings began to emerge.
All eyes are on a fee request from Quinn, Emanuel, Urquhart, & Sullivan. The class action, which revolved around Obamacare and insurers left unpaid after Congress neglected to pay promised subsidies, was completed in April when the US Supreme Court ruled that insurers were owed roughly $12 billion in unpaid subsidies meant to cover Americans without insurance.
India appears to be the latest country to embrace the practice of Litigation Finance—at least in theory. The Indian Prime Minister, Narendra Modi, recently spoke about foreign investment opportunities in India. One of the many types of foreign investments being encouraged is third-party litigation funding. This leaves some asking whether or not the Indian judicial system is ready for the practice.
William Farrell, Jr., Managing Director and Co-Founder of Chicago-based Longford Capital, recently appeared on a podcast hosted by K&L Gates. Farrell shared his personal journey from working as a prosecutor in the Cook County prosecutor’s office to founding and managing litigation funding powerhouse Longford Capital.
The False Claims Act has long been a source of contention in modern courts. The law, which dates back to 1863, allows anyone aware of fraud against the federal government to make a claim. The act is often cited by litigation funders, however, a court decision from earlier this week rules that such cases can be easily dismissed.
A data breach impacting at least 500 million guests is the foundation of a class-action-style suit filed against Marriott International. The alleged breaches took place between July 2014 and September 2018, and involve guests around the world, including about 30 million EU residents.
As the federal government in Australia sets up new regulations governing the Litigation Finance industry, some fear that class actions will be much more difficult to pursue. One major change requires that all funders be licensed by ASIC—and meet its expectations of competence, honesty, fairness, and efficiency. That may not seem like a tall order, but it’s not yet certain what hurdles must be cleared to obtain the required licenses.