Trending Now
  • Kansas Enacts Consumer Legal Funding Law, Offering a Bipartisan Regulatory Blueprint

Kansas Enacts Consumer Legal Funding Law, Offering a Bipartisan Regulatory Blueprint

By John Freund |

Kansas Enacts Consumer Legal Funding Law, Offering a Bipartisan Regulatory Blueprint

Kansas has adopted a comprehensive framework for regulating consumer legal funding, with Governor Laura Kelly signing the Transparency in Consumer Legal Funding Act, House Bill 2518, into law. Commentators have positioned the statute, which takes effect July 1, 2026, as a model for other states weighing how to oversee the fast-growing consumer funding sector.

As reported by the National Law Review, the measure passed unanimously in both chambers of the Republican-controlled legislature before earning the Democratic governor’s signature, a rare show of bipartisan consensus on an issue that has drawn sharp debate elsewhere. The law defines consumer legal funding as a non-recourse transaction in which a company purchases a contingent interest in the proceeds of a legal claim, and it expressly states that such funding is not a loan and is not subject to lending laws.

The statute builds in extensive consumer protections, including a 10-business-day rescission period without penalty, plain-language contract requirements, full disclosure of all charges and the maximum repayment amount, and mandatory attorney acknowledgment. It also bars referral fees and kickbacks, prohibits misleading advertising, and restricts funding companies from influencing litigation decisions.

On transparency, the law requires disclosure of funding agreements upon request by parties and insurers while shielding attorney-funder communications from discovery. Supporters describe that balance as the statute’s central achievement: protecting consumers through disclosure and accountability while preserving access to funding and safeguarding attorney independence, a template lawmakers in other states may look to replicate.

About the author

John Freund

John Freund

Consumer

View All

Legal-Bay Extends Pre-Settlement Funding to Plaintiffs in Nationwide Sexual Abuse Litigation

By John Freund |

Consumer legal funder Legal-Bay has announced that it is providing non-recourse pre-settlement funding to plaintiffs pursuing sexual abuse claims against schools, religious institutions, youth organizations, healthcare providers, and employers, as a new generation of survivor-led suits continues to move through state and federal dockets across the United States.

According to PR Newswire, Legal-Bay is positioning itself as a dedicated funding partner for these matters, citing the prolonged timelines that sexual abuse cases typically follow and the financial strain plaintiffs often face while litigation is pending. The release referenced the cluster of clergy abuse claims that have driven several Catholic archdioceses into bankruptcy in recent years as a defining context for the current funding need.

"Sexual abuse cases require a high level of sensitivity, trust, and long-term commitment," said Legal-Bay chief executive Chris Janish. "Our pre-settlement funding programs are designed to support plaintiffs through what can be a very difficult legal process, giving them the financial stability they need while seeking justice."

The announcement marks the third Legal-Bay funding initiative publicized in roughly a week, following parallel outreach to AFFF firefighting foam and Depo-Provera plaintiffs. Taken together, the releases reflect the funder's continued push to align its consumer book around large, high-profile mass tort and institutional abuse dockets where settlement values are expected to develop over multi-year timelines.

Legal-Bay Extends Non-Recourse Funding to AFFF PFAS Firefighting Foam Cancer Plaintiffs

By John Freund |

Consumer legal funder Legal-Bay has announced that it is providing pre-settlement funding to plaintiffs in the AFFF firefighting foam mass tort, as nationwide litigation tied to PFAS-related cancers and other diseases continues to advance toward bellwether trials.

According to PR Newswire, the AFFF multidistrict litigation has become one of the largest toxic tort proceedings in the United States, with thousands of personal injury claims consolidated in federal court alongside the municipal water contamination cases that have already produced multi-billion-dollar settlements with several chemical manufacturers.

Legal-Bay's funding is non-recourse, meaning plaintiffs repay advances only on a recovery, with no obligation if a case is unsuccessful. Eligible applicants include firefighters, military veterans, airport workers, industrial workers, and civilians diagnosed with cancers of the kidney, testicle, pancreas, prostate, liver, bladder, or thyroid, as well as thyroid disease, ulcerative colitis, and immune system disorders linked to PFAS exposure. The funder said applications are typically approved within 24 to 48 hours of receipt of case documentation.

"Toxic exposure litigation involving PFAS and firefighting foam can take years to fully resolve," said Legal-Bay chief executive Chris Janish. The announcement follows a similar Legal-Bay outreach to Depo-Provera plaintiffs earlier this week, reflecting a pattern of consumer funders positioning around large mass tort dockets ahead of bellwether outcomes that may define settlement values.

Legal-Bay Extends Non-Recourse Funding to Depo-Provera Mass Tort Plaintiffs

By John Freund |

Consumer legal funder Legal-Bay has announced that it is actively providing pre-settlement funding to plaintiffs in the Depo-Provera product liability litigation, offering non-recourse advances as the coordinated proceedings move through early discovery.

According to PR Newswire, lawsuits involving Pfizer's injectable contraceptive Depo-Provera are in mid-stage litigation across U.S. courts, with plaintiffs alleging the product caused serious health complications including decreased bone density and meningioma brain tumors, as well as inadequate warnings about long-term risks. Cases are being organized through coordinated proceedings, with bellwether trials expected to shape future settlement values; no global settlement has been finalized.

Legal-Bay's funding is non-recourse, meaning plaintiffs repay advances only if they prevail or settle, with no repayment obligation absent a recovery. The funder said applications from lawyers and plaintiffs in active Depo-Provera matters are typically approved within 24 to 48 hours of receiving case documentation. "We are very active in this litigation and are a preferred funder to many of the top Depo Provera firms in the country," said Legal-Bay chief executive Chris Janish.

The announcement illustrates the continued role of consumer legal funding in large mass tort dockets, where plaintiffs often face extended timelines before resolution. It also reflects funders' practice of positioning early in emerging product liability litigation as bellwether outcomes begin to define potential settlement frameworks.