Trending Now

LFJ Podcast: Stuart Hills and Guy Nielson, Co-Founders of RiverFleet

By John Freund |

LFJ Podcast: Stuart Hills and Guy Nielson, Co-Founders of RiverFleet

In this episode, we sat down with Stuart Hills and Guy Nielson, co-founders of RiverFleet, a consultancy business specialising in the global Legal Finance market.  

RiverFleet works with clients to help navigate the complexities and idiosyncratic characteristics of the Legal Finance market and make the most of the financial opportunities and risk solutions the market has to offer for business and investment. 

RiverFleet has a highly experienced team, with specialist litigation, finance and structuring, and investment and portfolio management expertise.  They offer a broad range of legal finance services tailor-made for a global client base, including investors, litigation finance funds, claimants, corporates, insolvency practitioners and law firms.

Watch the episode below:

About the author

John Freund

John Freund

Commercial

View All

Pravati Capital Partners with SEI to Bring Litigation Finance to Registered Investment Advisors

By John Freund |

One of the oldest litigation finance firms in the United States has announced a strategic partnership aimed at expanding mainstream investor access to the asset class.

As reported by Business Wire via Yahoo Finance, Scottsdale-based Pravati Capital has partnered with financial services firm SEI to provide registered investment advisors with structured access to litigation finance as an alternative investment option. The collaboration will leverage SEI's distribution platform to make litigation funding opportunities available within advisor portfolios.

The partnership reflects growing institutional interest in litigation finance as an alternative asset class. Historically, litigation funding has been difficult for mainstream financial advisors to access on behalf of their clients, with the market largely dominated by specialized funds and institutional investors. The Pravati-SEI arrangement seeks to bridge that gap by creating a more accessible pathway for advisors seeking diversification through non-correlated investments.

The announcement underscores a broader industry shift as litigation finance continues to move from a niche strategy toward greater acceptance within traditional wealth management channels. As the global litigation funding market grows — projected to reach over $25 billion in 2026 — partnerships like this one may signal a new phase of institutional adoption.

UK Litigation Funding Expert Calls for Mandatory Legal Expenses Insurance in Testimony to MPs

By John Freund |

A leading UK litigation funding expert has urged Parliament to consider making legal expenses insurance compulsory for all citizens as a means of improving access to justice.

As reported by Legal Futures, Dr. John Sorabji — co-chair of the Civil Justice Council working party on litigation funding and former principal legal adviser to the Lord Chief Justice — told the Justice Select Committee that mandatory LEI coverage deserves serious consideration. He acknowledged the recommendation is a personal view rather than an official CJC position.

Currently, LEI take-up in England stands at just 8 percent and 13 percent in Wales, compared to 95 percent in Sweden and 35 percent in Germany. Justice Select Committee chair Andy Slaughter suggested public reluctance may stem from a perception that LEI is "a rip-off."

Dr. Sorabji also urged the government to introduce retrospective legislation reversing the Supreme Court's PACCAR judgment, which classified litigation funding arrangements as damages-based agreements — a ruling that has significantly disrupted the UK funding market. The testimony comes as Parliament continues to examine structural barriers to civil justice and the role that both insurance and litigation funding play in enabling access to the courts.

Illinois Lawmaker Introduces Bill to Regulate Third-Party Litigation Funding

By John Freund |

An Illinois state legislator has introduced new legislation aimed at bringing transparency and consumer protections to the state's growing third-party litigation funding market.

As reported by AOL, State Rep. Dan Ugaste, R-Geneva, filed HB5244, which would require disclosure of third-party lawsuit funders, block foreign interests from financing domestic litigation, prevent funders from steering cases or pressuring settlements, and cap investor returns to ensure plaintiffs receive the majority of recoveries.

"If you are going to profit from lawsuits filed in Illinois, you shouldn't be allowed to hide in the shadows," Ugaste said. The bill, he added, "creates basic rules to ensure outside funders aren't steering cases."

Katie Reilly, Executive Director of the Illinois Coalition for Legal Reform, noted that "commercial third-party litigation funding has grown quickly, but Illinois law has not kept pace." The organization expressed support for the measure.

Similar legislation has already passed in Wisconsin and Indiana. However, HB5244 faces uncertain prospects in the Democrat-dominated Illinois General Assembly, where trial lawyers who benefit from third-party financing have historically donated millions to state Democrats. The bill reflects a broader national trend of state-level efforts to impose guardrails on the rapidly expanding litigation funding industry.