Press release: Litigation Capital Management attracts blue chip investors to new US$150m Third-Party Fund

Litigation Capital Management Limited (AIM:LIT), a leading international provider of litigation financing solutions, is pleased to announce the first close of a new third party fund of up to US$150 million, LCM Global Alternative Returns Fund (the Fund). In accordance with the Company’s strategy and as previously communicated to the market, the close of this Fund marks LCM’s return to managing third-party funds, following the building of a permanent source of balance sheet capital through the equity markets.

Managed by LCM, the Fund will supplement the deployment of capital from LCM’s own balance sheet, significantly increasing its ability to invest in new opportunities in line with its stated strategy. The Fund will target global dispute finance investments including both single disputes and corporate portfolio transactions, further detail on the investment pipeline is set out below.

Fund participants

  • The Fund’s cornerstone investors include firstly the large endowment of a US University and secondly, the asset management division of a large global investment bank. Both have extensive experience of investing in the litigation finance asset class and entrenched rights to participate in future funds raised by LCM, demonstrating their commitment to LCM and also to the asset class more widely.
  • Three further participants in the Fund include: a further US-based university endowment, a Swiss-based fund manager specialising in investing in litigation finance and a substantial European family office with significant investment experience in litigation finance.

Structure

  • The Fund will co-invest with investments from LCM’s balance sheet on a 75:25 basis
  • LCM’s balance sheet contribution (25%) will be invested and advanced on a monthly basis over the term of each investment, no upfront contribution will be required
  • Performance fees will be payable to LCM as fund manager on the basis of a deal by deal waterfall
  • In addition to receiving its 25% share of any profit from each investment from its co-investment, for the provision of its management services LCM will also receive:

–        25% of profit on each Fund investment as and when it matures over a soft return hurdle (full catch up) of 8%; and

–        an outperformance return of 35% for all Fund returns over an IRR of 20%.

  • The Fund has a term of six years including an inception period of two years during which investments can be entered into (the Inception Period)

The Fund as at first close has raised US$140 million, leaving a balance of up to US$10 million to be raised in due course. The decision to hold a first close of the Fund before all commitments were ready to be made, was driven by a strong pipeline of quality investment opportunities with which the Fund could be seeded. The Fund will be seeded with nine single-case investments which include international arbitrations, class actions, commercial litigation and investor state treaty claims. These investments are not being seeded from LCM’s existing balance sheet portfolio which it will continue to manage. The total capital commitment of the seeded investments amounts to approximately US$33 million representing a total commitment of 22% of the Fund upon inception. LCM is confident that the Fund will be fully committed comfortably inside the two-year Inception Period.

Patrick Moloney, CEO of LCM, commented: “The entry into this external fund provides a significant increase to our available capital and a boost to our investment capability, enabling us to broaden and accelerate the expansion of our portfolio with a view to ultimately delivering greater returns for shareholders.

“It also constitutes the first step towards LCM operating a funds management business. Indeed, future funds will be underpinned by the entrenched rights of our cornerstone investors.

“It is testament to our disciplined approach and track record that the Fund attracted such significant international investment in the sector, giving us scope to accept investment from only the very best and most experienced global providers of third-party capital into the asset class.”

Nick Rowles-Davies, Executive Vice-Chairman of LCM, added: “The fact such high-calibre investors have insisted upon entrenched contribution rights in future funds is a very valuable endorsement of LCM’s ability to attract blue chip investment capital on a global scale.

“We are delighted to welcome our new partners and look forward to working closely with them to capitalise on the growing number of attractive opportunities available in the global litigation finance space.”

Further updates with respect to the Fund commitment and its performance will be made as appropriate.

LCM Contact:

Angela Bilbow

Global Head of Communications abilbow@lcmfinance.com

+44 (0)7469 816818

NOTES

Litigation Capital Management (LCM) is a leading international provider of litigation financing solutions. This includes single-case and portfolios across; class actions, commercial claims, claims arising out of insolvency and international arbitration. LCM has an unparalleled track record, driven by effective project selection, active project management and robust risk management.

Headquartered in Sydney, with offices in London, Singapore, Brisbane and Melbourne, LCM listed on AIM in December 2018, trading under the ticker LIT.

www.lcmfinance.com

Announcements

View All

Pegasus Legal Capital Completes $74 Million Securitization to Fuel Growth

Pegasus Legal Capital, LLC ("Pegasus") (mylawfunds.com), a prominent pre-settlement legal funding company in the United States, announced today that it has successfully completed a $74 million litigation finance securitization. This achievement marks Pegasus' second securitization transaction in the asset class and another significant milestone in its capital market journey. The proceeds from this transaction will further propel Pegasus' growth across key markets in the United States.

Pegasus Managing Director, Alexander Khanas, expressed, "With the successful completion of this transaction, Pegasus will expand its business in the personal injury market while upholding its industry-leading service standards."

GreensLedge Capital Markets LLC played the role of Placement Agent for Pegasus. GreensLedge Senior Managing Director, Douglas Lipton, added, "We are delighted to continue expanding Pegasus' investor base through their second securitization issuance and assisting them in creatively developing their platform."

Headquartered in Deerfield Beach, Florida, Pegasus was founded in 2008 as a pre-settlement litigation finance company. Since its inception, the company's management team has successfully sourced, underwritten, and serviced over half a billion dollars through more than 30,000 advances. While Pegasus has traditionally focused on the New York market, it has established a strong presence in the Southeast and Texas markets as well.

Pegasus is a proud member of the American Legal Finance Association (ALFA), a national organization comprising companies that provide non-recourse funds to personal injury victims. ALFA's primary objective is to establish industry standards for transparency in legal funding transactions, ensuring upfront and clear disclosure to consumers.

Read More

New Burford Capital Research Reveals How Businesses are Preparing for Likely Rise in Global Energy Transition Disputes

By Harry Moran |

Burford Capital, the leading global finance and asset management firm focused on law, today releases new research entitled “Energy transition disputes: GCs and senior lawyers on the business impacts of legal challenges to come,” which demonstrates how businesses are preparing for a likely rise in legal disputes related to the global energy transition. This transition―or the shift to renewable sources of energy―is likely to cause an increase in expensive commercial disputes.

Businesses are investing significant sums in this transition, and corporate commitments highlight the scale of economic engagement as they invest in the new technologies, infrastructure and other resources that will be needed. But multifaceted legal and commercial pressures present businesses with a myriad of potential challenges including contractual disagreements, regulatory compliance issues and the need for intellectual property enforcement or litigation. Burford’s research report aims to offer a unique perspective on how corporations foresee the expected rise in litigation and arbitration related to this energy transition, examining the areas of business impact related to this evolving landscape.

Burford commissioned this independent research by capturing insights from 300 GCs and heads of litigation across key industries impacted by the energy transition and spanning North America, Europe, Asia and Australia.

Key findings from the study include:

Disputes relating to the energy transition are rising

·       76% of GCs report they are already encountering disputes related to the energy transition and nearly half (47%) expect a further rise in the volume of such disputes in the next decade, driven by evolving laws, new technologies and infrastructure requirements.

Disputes relating to the energy transition are expected to be costly

·       Almost two in three GCs (63%) expect legal fees and expenses to exceed $4 million per energy transition case; a notable minority (29%) expect per case costs to exceed $10 million.

·       Over half (52%) view high costs as a significant factor in deciding not to pursue disputes.

·       Half (50%) of GCs agree that the energy transition will create the need for additional capital sources for the business.

Expected disputes span all types of business conflict

·       GCs are most likely to predict (77%) that the energy transition will result in more contractual disputes and commercial arbitration.

·       Joint ventures are expected to be particularly prone to disputes over profit allocation (76%) and intellectual property rights (65%).

·       Over half of GCs (57%) also expect their businesses to face arbitrations to resolve investor-state conflicts relating to the transition.

New tools are needed to manage the rising dispute costs

·       Legal finance is increasingly used to mitigate the financial burden of these disputes; three in four (75%) GCs have used or would consider using legal finance to offset the cost of disputes relating to this transition.

·       In particular, GCs value monetization―or advancing some of the expected entitlement of a pending claim, judgment or award― to generate liquidity from claims tied up in litigation and arbitration. With legal finance, companies can also offset the cost of pursuing affirmative litigation to generate liquidity, shifting legal departments from cost centers to value drivers.

Christopher Bogart, CEO of Burford Capital, said: “Businesses face significant challenges related to the global energy transition due to cross-border projects, differing legal frameworks and rapidly evolving policies. Additionally, long-term energy contracts may not keep pace with energy markets and technologies, resulting in conflicts among stakeholders. Burford’s latest research demonstrates the value of corporate finance for law, as legal finance helps companies manage the high costs of energy transition disputes and allows them to pursue meritorious claims without depleting resources.”

Burford’s research is based on a 2024 survey conducted by GLG and is supplemented by interviews with ten global energy transition experts conducted by Ari Kaplan Advisors.

The research report can be downloaded on Burford’s website.

Read More

Hannah Sadler Joins GLS Capital Patent Investment Team

By Harry Moran |

Hannah Sadler has joined the firm as a vice president and member of the patent investment team.

“We are very happy to welcome Hannah to GLS Capital as a vice president and member of our team focusing on patent investments,” said Adam Gill, a GLS Capital managing director, co-founder, and leader of the firm’s patent-related investing. “Attracting top-tier talent is essential for continuing to help our clients achieve success, and Hannah’s background in patent litigation will be invaluable for navigating the complexities of patent investments and helping to drive our mission forward.”

Sadler focuses on diligence around qualified underwriting opportunities and monitoring and managing the firm’s patent litigation investments.

Before joining GLS Capital, Sadler was a patent litigator at Global IP Law Group in Chicago. She has over a decade of experience with all aspects of patent portfolio management and enforcement, including prosecution, litigation, sales, licensing, and portfolio valuation.

Sadler earned her J.D. (cum laude) from DePaul University College of Law and her Bachelor of Arts from the University of San Diego.

Read More