Trending Now

All Articles

3220 Articles

Australian Funder Seeks Outside Investment to Finance New Cases

Litigation finance is booming around the world, and while new funders are increasingly popping up to meet regional demand, industry stalwarts are continuing to augment their resources. Reporting for the Australian Financial Review demonstrates this trend with a spotlight on Litigation Lending Services (LLS), which is looking to stock its war chest for future cases with a new funding round, in partnership with Credit Suisse. The Sydney-based funder is looking to raise up to $35 million in new capital from investors, aiming to put this money to work funding new litigation opportunities, while its previous ventures are still moving towards completion. While the firm has previously relied upon its internal capital to fund new ventures, this is the second time it has looked for external investment after the launch of its Litigation Lending Fund 1, back in 2019, which raised $50 million to take on cases. LLS, which was founded in 1999, claims a success rate of 93 per cent on cases that reach completion, and has backed many high-profile cases in Australia, including the class action against NT and WA for stolen wages.

Evaluating the Rise of Class Actions in the UK and Europe

While class actions have historically been much more prominent within the US legal system, which has been more open to aggressive litigious actions, the UK and Europe seem to be heading in a similar direction. In particular, large consumer group claims are now more frequently being brought against major multinationals, particularly in the area of competition law. In a piece of analysis for Lawyer Monthly, David Greene, senior partner at Edwin Coe, argues that there are three primary drivers of this increase outside the US. He notes that updates in court rules allowing opt-out mass claims, a rise in the number of specialist claimant firms and the increased presence of third-party capital from funders, provide ample fuel to power this explosive growth. As to whether this growth in class actions globally is a positive or negative for the industry, Greene highlights that it is not just that consumers are going after big business, but also companies are using these structures and tools to engage in aggressive litigation against other corporates. He also notes that it would be unwise to make a one-to-one comparison with the US system, due to the more limited liabilities and the more narrow scale of damages and costs that can be incurred.

LITFINCON ll: The Premier Litigation Finance Conference Returns to Houston

After a triumphant conference in March 2022, LITFINCON is excited to announce its return to The Post Oak Hotel in Houston, in March of 2023.  According to the company’s press release, this past year’s LITFINCON attracted global thought-leaders from a variety of disciplines in the legal and investment sectors. In particular, attendees learned about major trends and notable developments in litigation finance – an emerging asset class for institutional investors and a source of capital for legal professionals and law firms. Building on LITFINCON, LITFINCON II expects to have a diverse set of over 300 attendees that include leading business executives, judges, litigation funders, elite Am Law firms, corporate counsel, legal professors, and institutional investors. We are looking forward to hosting this event in our backyard, Houston, Texas, one of the largest legal markets in the country. Attendees will have the opportunity to listen to a diverse mix of insightful panel discussions, regulatory changes, judicial thoughts & opinions, and investment trends in litigation finance. There will be even more opportunities to connect with speakers, panelists, and other attendees to expand referral networks and become well-informed about this growing institutional asset class. New to the agenda, LITFINCON II will host an exclusive event for VIP attendees to experience the Houston Livestock Show and Rodeo, the largest livestock exhibition and rodeo in the world. The conference will also continue the fun tradition of "Law, Lunch & Laughs" with a celebrity comedian as a keynote speaker. LITFINCON II is thrilled to have early support from some of the most high-profile organizations in the litigation finance industry. Confirmed initial sponsors for LITFINCON II include Certum Group, CAC Specialty, Schulte Roth & Zabel, Omni Bridgeway, Filevine, Aon, Dunning Rievman, and Arran Capital. “We’re proud that the inaugural LITFINCON was a tremendous success and want to thank the many sponsors, panelists, and attendees, who attended from all over the world – London, Geneva, New York, Miami, San Francisco, and Austin. LITFINCON highlighted the growing field of litigation finance and the importance of Texas as a hub that unites all participants in the legal field. Siltstone Capital is excited about continuing the momentum and advancing the litigation finance field by hosting LITFINCON II in March 2023,” says Mani Walia, Managing Partner & General Counsel, Siltstone Capital. Entrusted by leading institutions, Siltstone Capital is a premier multi-strategy investment firm that provides capital solutions to litigants, law firms, and legal departments to help resolve their real-world legal issues and create significant value for all stakeholders.
Read More

Third-Party Funding in the UAE Requires a Tailored Approach

As the practice of litigation funding continues to expand globally, it is important for companies to be aware of the nuances of the regulatory structures governing funding arrangements in each jurisdiction. Within the United Arab Emirates (UAE), third-party funding is widely accepted, but as with other jurisdictions, there are local considerations which vary based on the specific type of funding that a client wishes to pursue. In a piece of analysis for Lexology, Nick Braganza and Nicola Gare of HFW, outline the best practices and key points to consider when seeking funding for disputes in the UAE. As the country has separate court systems, HFW highlights the most important issues to bear in mind. For example, where claims are brought in the Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC) or Abu Dhabi Global Market (ADGM) economic free zones, funders will mandate that clients acquire ATE insurance to offset risk in the event of adverse cost orders. However, this is not the case in the onshore courts, as those orders are rarely made, and where they do occur, do not represent a significant penalty. When it comes to the types of funding agreements, HFW notes that Damages Based Agreements are unlawful within the UAE, with the sole exception of the ADGM freezone. However, Conditional Fee Agreements are broadly accepted across the courts, but it is important to note that in the onshore courts, the legal costs that can be recovered are nominal. Furthermore, agreements must be structured based on the legal fees being incurred, and not based on a proportion of the financial reward should the case be successful.

Litigators Must Adapt to New Ways of Working post-Covid

The impact of the Covid pandemic has been wide-ranging across the legal industry, and in a fundamental sense, has reshaped the ways in which everyday proceedings are carried out. This is especially true for litigation where matters that would have required hours of in-person attendance, in addition to travel, can now be carried out more efficiently through virtual proceedings. In a conversation with Burford Capital, John Quinn, managing partner at Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, highlighted the ability to conduct depositions remotely as an area that has not only been executed effectively, but also has advantages over in-person depositions. However, Christopher Bogart, CEO of Burford, raised the issue that depositions may be less useful for the questioner when he or she is not able to be in the same room as the deposed individual. On a similar note, Quinn discussed how law and motion days in courts previously represented time-consuming and expensive exercises for attorneys, but now these have been replaced with more streamlined remote sessions. All of these factors will therefore shape the ways in which litigators and funders continue to work together in a post-Covid world.

Multibillion Pound Claim Filed Against Sony Group

A claim against Sony Group was filed on 19 August 2022 in the UK’s Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT). The claim is being brought on behalf of UK-based PlayStation users who have purchased digital games and/or add-on content from the PlayStation Store since 19 August 2016. The claim is being funded by Woodsford, the UK’s leading ESG, access to justice and litigation finance business. It’s alleged that Sony is breaching UK and EU competition law by abusing its dominant position resulting in consumers paying inflated prices for digital PlayStation games and add-on content. This standalone collective action is brought on behalf of an estimated 9 million potential class members. An application has been made to the CAT for a Collective Proceedings Order which if ordered will result in a single class representative representing all potential class members on an opt-out basis. The proposed class representative is consumer champion Alex Neill, Chief Executive of Resolver.co.uk. Alex’s team, funded by Woodsford, includes the law firm Milberg London LLP, economics experts at Berkeley Research Group LLC and barristers from Monckton Chambers. Woodsford’s Chief Executive Officer, Steven Friel, commented: “Woodsford’s ESG team is dedicated to holding big business to account when corporate wrongdoing causes loss to consumers and other stakeholders. We are proud to support Alex Neill's case, helping deliver access to justice for millions of gamers. Our significant financial and professional resource is already backing UK class actions against train companies accused of overcharging, and shippers whose cartel behaviour is alleged to have inflated the price of cars. With the launch of this claim against Sony, and with more landmark cases being worked up, Woodsford is now clearly established as the most successful ESG and litigation finance business in this area of UK collective redress." Further information on the claim and updates on its progress can be found at www.playstationyouoweus.com. About Woodsford Founded in 2010 and with a presence in London, New York, Brisbane, Philadelphia and Minneapolis, Woodsford is a leading ESG, access to justice and litigation finance business. Whether it is helping consumers achieve collective redress, ensuring that investors and universities are properly compensated when Big Tech infringes intellectual property rights, or helping shareholders in collaborative, escalated engagement up to and including litigation with listed companies, Woodsford is committed to ensuring the highest ESG standards while providing access to justice. Working globally with many of the world’s leading law firms, our legal experience, investment, business and technical expertise, in tandem with our significant financial muscle, makes us a powerful partner and a formidable adversary. Woodsford is a founder member of both the International Legal Finance Association (ILFA) and the Association of Litigation Funders of England & Wales (ALF), and a member of the International Corporate Governance Network. Woodsford continues to grow, and we welcome approaches from experienced litigation lawyers and other professionals who are interested in joining our team. For more information visit www.woodsford.com
Read More

A Snapshot of ESG in Litigation Funding

As the litigation funding market continues to grow and evolve, funders are placing a higher value on environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues. This development raises questions about the connection between ESG and litigation funding, how litigation funders are currently addressing ESG, and what the future of ESG in litigation funding will look like. The following article will offer answers to those questions and act as a general overview of the state of ESG in litigation funding.

What is ESG and Why Does it Matter?

ESG encompasses environmental issues like air or water pollution, social issues such as customer privacy and data security, and governance issues like transparency. ESG pursuits have come to the forefront of many corporate agendas over the last decade. In some cases, this focus may be self-imposed, but it’s often a legal requirement as well. Even as companies champion ESG to satisfy customers and shareholders, they don’t always stay in compliance with those values and/or laws. As the number of ESG-related laws and regulations increases, compliance will become a greater focus for companies and investors alike. Litigation exists as both a deterrent to, and a regulator of, ESG non-compliance. ESG cases in response to corporate non-compliance create the connection between ESG and litigation funding. As Tets Ishikawa, Managing Director at LionFish Litigation Finance stated, litigation funding of ESG cases has a key role to play in helping businesses meet their ESG goals. Corporate executives aren’t the only ones concerned about ESG issues, however; savvy investors also recognize the importance of ESG. Responsible investing in ESG causes is often an obligation for pension fund managers and other asset allocators. Even when that is not the case, investors increasingly see ESG as a priority, with 85 percent of investors interested in sustainable investing.

Litigation Funders Pursuing ESG Cases

Major players in the litigation funding arena are already talking about or pursuing ESG investments. Funders like Therium, Woodsfood, North Wall Capital, and Litigation Lending Services have prioritized ESG cases, and more funders will likely join them in the coming years. One leading litigation funder, Therium, emphasizes the importance of ESG as part of broader responsible investing efforts. Funding ESG legal action, the funder states, makes justice more accessible for those harmed in ESG breaches. Litigation funding helps those claims be brought, even when the claimants don’t have the resources to fund extensive legal battles. Woodsford is another litigation funder touting the value of ESG litigation. Bob Koneck, Director of LitFin and legal counsel at Woodsford, emphasized the potential of ESG litigation as a reputation-enhancing tool for companies. He claims that companies can position themselves as ESG leaders through litigation, while also recovering money to use toward additional ESG initiatives. This is a unique view on the value of ESG litigation that speaks to the potential these cases have for corporations. This past week’s news cycle illustrates how cemented the concept of ESG litigation has become within the litigation funding ecosystem, as both new entrants and entrenched players are making waves on the topic. North Wall Capital recently announced a $100 million investment into law firm Pogust Goodhead, with the aim of funding ESG cases specifically. Fabian Chrobog, Chief Investment Officer of North Wall, argues that ESG investment makes practical sense, as these cases maintain a higher probability of settlement than most other claim types. And Paul Rand, Chief Investment Officer of Omni Bridgeway, recently revealed that the longtime funder is planning the launch of an ESG Finance fund. According to Rand, Omni is currently testing bespoke techniques for valuing and assessing ESG risk management.

ESG Cases Funded by Litigation Funders

Airbus Case Funded by Woodsford One prominent ESG case organized and funded by a litigation funder, is the Airbus case financed by Woodsford. Investigations by international authorities including the US Department of Justice revealed that Airbus SE, a manufacturer of military and civilian aerospace products headquartered in Europe, had participated in a widescale bribery and corruption scheme. In 2020, the company was forced to pay billions of dollars of fines to resolve these bribery charges, causing a major dip in its share price. Airbus investors incurred serious losses due to these violations of ESG principles and Airbus’ failure to inform the public in a timely manner about its conduct. That’s where litigation funder Woodsford got involved. Woodsford organized the affected investors into a special purpose entity, Airbus Investors Recovery Limited (AIRL), which is currently pursuing legal action against Airbus in Amsterdam to recover losses. The ESG team at Woodsford is funding and organizing this action. Without such involvement, the claimants may not have been able to pursue action against a large company with such deep pockets. Being able to hold major corporations like Airbus accountable for their egregious ESG breaches is one of the most significant benefits of litigation funding. Litigation Lending Services' "Stolen Wages" Claim Litigation Lending Services, an Australian litigation funder, funded another notable ESG case related to stolen wages. This class action began in September of 2016, and was a lawsuit on behalf of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander workers in Australia. The workers had been subject to ‘protection’ legislation from the late 1800s up to the 1970s. This wage control legislation led to tens of thousands of indigenous workers across a variety of industries never receiving their full wages, estimated to be millions of Australian dollars in total. Wage violations like these fall under the governance portion of ESG. Litigation Lending Services offered its support to the case, which reached a settlement of $190 million in December, 2019. To date, the case is the largest human rights case in Australian history. The settlement brought resolution to more than ten thousand First Nations people. Both of these cases illustrate the potential of ESG, and the possibilities for more ESG cases and litigation funder involvement in the future. In Conclusion Global legal actions related to ESG issues like climate change are increasing, and the targets of these lawsuits are shifting to include more corporations over time, rather than just governments. It’s worth noting that environmental issues often get the most attention, but ESG litigation goes beyond just environmental claims. Lawsuits involving fraud, disclosure rule breaches, diversity and equity, misrepresentation, and health and safety issues all fall under the category of ESG litigation. Environmental claims have seen the largest growth in the last few years, but we can expect other types of ESG lawsuits to increase as well. Another factor driving additional ESG litigation is the lack of clarity surrounding what exactly constitutes ESG. The intense focus on ESG is fairly new, meaning parties are not in complete agreement on the definition of ESG and how it should be measured and reported. As the number of ESG group claims increases, there’s room for growth in the litigation funding market. This industry is constantly evolving to keep up with broader trends in litigation, including the evolution of ESG claims. For now, it’s clear ESG will have a key role to play in the future of litigation funding.
Read More

Deminor Sees Growing Adoption of Third-Party Funding in Latin America

While the US, Europe and Australia dominate the conversation around litigation funding, there is a clear uptick in the sector’s adoption in other countries and regions. Latin America is one of these areas experiencing a growth in litigation finance, with countries like Brazil and Mexico leading the way. In an interview with LexLatin, senior counsel for Deminor’s Latin America practice, Paloma Castro, discussed the increase in appetite from in-house lawyers and other industry professionals who seek third-party funding for litigation. In particular, Castro highlights the regularity of arbitration proceedings as a key driver in these countries’ adoption of external funding, given the range of costs that are attached to arbitration. Castro also discusses the lack of a strict regulatory framework around third-party funding in Latin America, noting that the main issue for regulators in the region is around disclosure of funding agreements to try and avoid conflicts of interest for arbitrators. With regard to broader implementation of legislation focused on litigation funding, Castro suggests that funders should take the view that as long as there is no prohibition against the mechanism, then it should be viewed as implicitly allowed within these jurisdictions.

Litigation Funders are Being Courted to Finance Russian Asset Seizure Cases

In a new instance of litigation finance being tied to high-profile and newsworthy events, the possibility of leveraging third-party funding to finance claims against high-net-worth Russian individuals has been raised. Reporting from Bloomberg sheds light on the news that lawyers from McCue Jury & Partners and Mishcon de Reya are pursuing the possibility of funding their proceedings using capital from outside financiers. These claims aim to provide financial restitution to Ukrainian citizens who have suffered during the Russian invasion of their country, which began in February of this year. Speaking for Mischon de Reya, Ben Brandon, a partner for the firm, says that while this would be a landmark use of third-party funding, they have not yet secured guarantees that there are funders who have an appetite for this unique set of cases. Bloomberg’s own reporting reveals that funders may be hesitant due to the unlikelihood that any successful claims could be enforced, and therefore the probability of seeing a return on investment would be in serious doubt. The coalition of lawyers pursuing these actions, the Ukraine Justice Alliance, represent an alternative approach for governments that have established sanctions on Russian individuals, but have been unable to seize the majority of the targeted assets. One of the founding partners at McCue Jury & Partners, Jason McCue, states that there is at least $200 billion worth of potential assets they could pursue, and that such claims would achieve real compensation for working-class Ukrainians.