Trending Now
  • LionFish Updates Model Documents in Response to CJC Report

All Articles

3568 Articles
Commercial Deals

Global Mining Bosses Seek Liquidity and Legal Enterprise Portfolio Building 

With the rapid development of litigation franchises around the planet, savvy litigation investors are researching litigation opportunities in the mining sector. Jeffery Commission (Director at Burford Capital) explains how his enterprise is shaping international mining claims inside a legacy fund portfolio.  Mr. Commission says that numerous sovereign mining contracts will be forced to renegotiate terms and conditions. Many fear that opportunistic adversaries may seek to defraud individuals and group investors.  Burford's research notes that between 1966 and 202, 25% of global arbitration at the International Center for Settlement of Investor Disputes has oil, gas and mining companies seeking resolutions.
Commercial People Moves Regulatory Issues

The Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy on Global Trends in ESG Litigation 

Litigation Finance Journal has collated 107 highlights to Joana Setzer and Catherine Higham's international ESG research published by the Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy. In summary, all indicators signal a decade of cross-border climate litigation ahead for humanity as a whole.  Key themes from the Global Trends in Climate Change Litigation include a significant increase in strategic litigation focused on market makers in New York. According to sources used by Setzer and Hingham, financial markets in the United States have yet to meet a group like ClientEarth, which has dominated the European ESG litigation scene.  Further emphasis is being placed on clumsy climate funds front-running ESG strategies. Al Gore and Apple's latest fund could be impacted, according to the Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy.
Commercial Fundraising

Experity Ventures Secures $32M from Brean Capital 

Experity Ventures is widely known for its work to provide non-recourse loans and litigation finance products to medical claimants as well as medical professionals. Experity has announced a $32M capital infusion by Brean Capital.  Experity's chair and founder Joseph Greco explains that his firm has developed a dynamic litigation finance platform. Mr. Greco suggests that the medical litigation investment marketplace is prime for consolidation. Greco says that the new investment will add value to Experity's industry consolidation efforts.  Click here to read more.
Commercial Regulatory Issues

New Zealand Commission Recommends Changes To Class Action And Funding Regulations

An advisory body in New Zealand has provided updated guidance and recommendations for new legislation to regulate class actions and the litigation funding industry. The Law Commission, an independent Crown entity, has put forward a range of proposals including a new Class Actions Act, which aims to strengthen access to legal redress by removing restrictions on the types of claims or legal jurisdictions under which actions can be brought. The recommendations also include an array of suggestions for improving and regulating legal funding. Providing insights for Bell Gully, Sophie East and Tim Shiels highlight that the commission’s approach focused on both tightening regulation of the industry, whilst also recognizing that litigation funding has been key to expanding access to the class actions process. Among the proposals focused on litigation funding are measures to ensure all funding agreements are approved by the court, that claimants must disclose these agreements, and provide the courts with the power to implement cost orders on the litigation funders. Finally, they note that in a separate move, the commission recommends the creation of a publicly-funded class action scheme to avoid potential claimants being left behind if their actions would not be commercially profitable for a third party funder.
Case Developments Commercial

Apple And Google Face Class Action Suit Over Anti-Competition Allegations

Tech goliaths Apple and Google are under the spotlight in Australia, as they face a twin class action suit alleging that they breached consumer law by using their dominant market share to force out competition and price gauge both consumers and developers in their app stores. The case is being brought by Phi Finney McDonald, whose case is being backed by Vannin Capital, a UK-based fund. According to Australian Lawyer, the case hinges on the claim that Apple and Google took advantage of their power by forcing developers to utilize their own payment platforms whilst mandating commissions of only 30%, or sometimes even lower.  Google has argued that it strongly supports competition in the market, however, both companies are also accused of employing non-negotiable contracts with developers through which these entities would then have no control over future contract changes.
Commercial Regulatory Issues

High Court Ruling Suggests Funder Liability Is Broader Than Expected

The extent and scope of litigation funding liability is being questioned, after a High Court ruled the funder was liable for costs predating the litigation funding agreement (LFA).  In analysis for Lexology, Jodie Gittins and Chris Ross of RPC noted that this is a signal to funders to not assume their liability in unsuccessful claims will be measured against their portion of funding contributed, nor will it be limited by the start date of their funding agreement.  In the case of The ECU Group plc v HSBC Bank Plc & ors, the claimant had entered into an LFA with Therium in September 2019, to fund the action and partially cover costs that The ECU Group had accrued since November 2018. After the Commercial Court had dismissed all claims and ruled that ECU must pay the defendant’s costs, HSBC asked the court to order Therium to be jointly liable for all costs dating back to the start of proceedings. Mrs Justice Moulder ruled that Therium was indeed liable for these costs as they had (in part) covered these costs for ECU. As the courts have a breadth of options when deciding costs orders, funders should be mindful that in cases where they have the potential to reap a large reward if successful, they may face an equally significant loss when the outcome is reversed.
Commercial

Omni Bridgeway Discusses Defense Investment Options

Jason Levine (Investment Manager and Legal Counsel at Omni Bridgeway) has a new feature exploring all the ways claimants can consider defense-side legal investment.  Levine outlines several examples of Omni's defense-side investments, including hybrid portfolio products and reverse contingency agreements.  Mr. Levine shares a wide variety of ways Omni can help finance worthwhile claims and provide options for splitting any settlement or award recoupment. Furthermore, Levine outlines the need for claimants and investors to determine what 'success' will mean for a claim, as settlements or awards can vary depending on a multitude of factors.  Click here to learn more.
Commercial Fundraising

New UK Funder Aims to Serve Regional Market

The UK litigation funding market has traditionally been very London-centric. However, a new funder aims to change this by providing services regionally targeted to the Midlands and the North. Thaxted Capital, owned by Jack Bradley-Seddon, is looking to fill this gap in the market by offering support for local cases of up to £1m. The new funder is backed by £25m from US private equity fund, Sandton Capital Partners, which will approve funding on a case-by-case basis. According to Legal Futures, Mr Bradley-Seddon wants to not only bring much-need services to these regions, but also take an approach that deals with clients in a direct manner. He stresses that their approach will focus on clear communication, and while he would not set a minimum case size, the average range is predicted to be around £500,000. Thaxted will also avoid charging clients based on a portion of damages, instead calculating charges based on capital deployed. Thaxted Capital will also be supported by Justina Stewart, a commercial barrister from Outer Temple Chambers, in an advisory capacity.
Commercial Legal Innovation

Litigation Finance in China? It’s Not Out of the Question

The growth in third party litigation funding has seen the practice evolve in new markets from Europe to Asia. However, we have yet to experience its adoption in every major market, and with ample funding resources available, there are still plenty of opportunities for the industry to grow. Of all these untapped regions, China stands out from the pack both for its size and scope. In a recent analysis by DLA Piper, Legal Director Jue Jun Lu makes the case for why Chinese entities should look to utilize third party funding, particularly when it comes to the realm of international arbitration. This analysis examines the benefits and opportunities for external finance in both single case and portfolio funding. In the former case, third party funding can be a useful tool in the arsenal of a company to manage cash flow, without negatively impacting financial reporting. Additionally, this approach reduces risk for the company dramatically, whilst also placing the claimant in a position of strength, demonstrating its ability to commit adequate capital to the litigation. With regards to portfolio funding, DLA Piper highlights the flexibility provided to any company involved in multiple disputes, allowing these entities to fund smaller cases that might not otherwise qualify for funding. Leveraging this new avenue of litigation finance would allow Chinese companies to engage with their multinational counterparts, who have already taken advantage of third party funding to bolster their Legal Services sectors.