Government Must Protect Litigation Funding That Helped Sub-Postmasters, Say Consumer Champions and Small Businesses
Consumer champions and small businesses have called on the Government to introduce urgent legislation to protect the funding mechanism that helped Alan Bates expose the Post Office.
Litigation funding is currently supporting the equal pay claims of 100,000 female supermarket workers, rugby players facing life-changing injuries, and billpayers claiming water companies lied about dumping raw sewage in the UK’s waterways. Funders provide financial backing for cases in exchange for an agreed share of the proceeds.
But since a 2023 Supreme Court ruling in PACCAR which sent shockwaves through the sector, uncertainty has impacted claimants and funders. Defendants have mounted a series of legal challenges to funding arrangements with Apple, Sony and Mastercard all set to challenge current funding models in the Court of Appeal next year. Additionally, there was a 75% slowdown in cases funded in the second half of last year, according to Exton Advisors which is an independent specialist adviser to claimants, funders and law firms.
In an open letter to the Government, class representatives for millions of consumers and the truck hauliers involved in the original PACCAR claim against a price-fixing cartel, said the PACCAR ruling “jeopardises past, present and future funding agreements, and is threatening access to justice for individuals and businesses”.
A bill to fix the issue had won cross-party support in the previous Parliament, but had not passed into law before Parliament was dissolved. The new Government has said it will not review the need for legislation until late next year.
Signatories of the open letter said: “While there has previously been cross-party support for a simple and speedy legislative fix, the Government is dragging its heels on addressing the issue. Until this issue is resolved, uncertainty for claimants will persist.
“We call on the Prime Minister - who spent his legal career securing justice for those who needed it - to urgently introduce a simple legal fix to ensure David can afford to take on Goliath and access to justice is preserved for those seeking to protect their basic rights.”
Neil Purslow, chairman of the International Legal Finance Association and chief investment officer at funder Therium which backed the sub-postmasters’ case, said:
“Litigation funding provides a narrow route to justice for businesses and individuals - many of whom are trying to protect their basic rights.
“We hope the Government hears these concerns, understands the real impact this is having on claimants and brings forward an urgent fix so people like the sub-postmasters can continue to access and secure justice in the future.”
Notes
Professor Carolyn Roberts vs Thames Water, Severn Trent, Anglian Water and Others
- A collective action against six UK water companies for alleged overcharging due to underreporting of sewage pollution incidents between 2017-2020.
Alex Neill, Class Representative, vs Sony Playstation
- A £5bn collective action alleging Sony abused its dominant position by imposing unfair terms on PlayStation game developers, resulting in excessive prices for consumers.
Nikki Stopford, Class Representative, vs Google and Others
- A £7bn collective action alleging Google abused its dominant position in the search engine market, resulting in inflated advertising costs and higher prices for consumers.
Clare Spottiswoode, Class Representative, vs Nexans France SAS & Others
- A collective action alleging that cable manufacturers' cartel activities led to inflated domestic electricity prices in Great Britain.
Richard Smith, Chairman of Road Hauliers Association, vs PACCAR and Others
- A £2bn opt-in class action against major truck manufacturers for their involvement in a price-fixing cartel that allegedly inflated vehicle prices between 1997 and 2011.
Open letter from claimants and class reps
Over the years, litigation funding has helped to remedy some of the worst miscarriages of justice in legal history. It has levelled the playing field for individuals and small businesses, as well as exposing corporate wrongdoing on a colossal scale - from the Post Office Horizon scandal to Dieselgate.
Today the sector is financially backing attempts to secure people’s basic rights — supporting equal pay claims for over 100,000 women, helping sportspeople receive compensation for life-changing injuries, and holding water companies to account for dumping sewage in our waterways.
But the recent Supreme Court’s PACCAR ruling now jeopardizes past, present and future funding agreements, and is threatening access to justice for individuals and businesses.
While there has previously been cross-party support for a simple and speedy legislative fix, the Government is dragging its heels on addressing the issue. Until that fix is put in place, uncertainty for claimants will persist.
We call on the Prime Minister - who spent his legal career securing justice for those who needed it - to urgently introduce a simple legal fix to ensure David can afford to take on Goliath and access to justice is preserved for those seeking to protect their basic rights.
Signed
Richard Smith, Chairman of Road Hauliers Association, vs PACCAR and Others
Professor Carolyn Roberts vs Thames Water, Severn Trent, Anglian Water and Others
Alex Neill, Class Representative, vs Sony Playstation
Nikki Stopford, Class Representative, vs Google and Others
Clare Spottiswoode, Class Representative, vs Nexans France SAS & Others