Trending Now
Commercial Deals

New research shows companies with large claims recover more and preserve budgets by using legal finance as part of their class action opt out strategies

September 13, 2022

New research shows companies with large claims recover more and preserve budgets by using legal finance as part of their class action opt out strategies

Burford Capital, the leading global finance and asset management firm focused on law, today releases new independent research demonstrating the value of legal finance for companies with valuable commercial class action claims. In recent years, Burford has seen an increasing number of major corporations choosing to opt out of class action lawsuits to pursue high value claims individually and has commissioned independent research to examine the trend in greater depth.

Although companies are currently still more likely to remain in the class than they are to opt out, the research reveals that their reasons for doing so are economic—and solvable with legal finance, which de-risks the choice to opt out and provides a clear benefit to corporations with high value claims. As most legal finance is non-recourse, companies can receive risk-free funding to pursue meritorious claims as individual plaintiffs, as well as to accelerate the often-significant value represented by pending claims.

Given the results of the research, Burford expects the trend toward opt outs will continue, with major companies choosing to rethink their opt out strategies with legal finance.

Christopher Bogart, CEO of Burford Capital, said: “Burford’s independent research on commercial class actions demonstrates the clear benefit that legal finance provides to companies with significant claims. If you’re a GC and you have a claim that’s big enough to merit opting out, you should, because you’ll recover more, and you can do so without budget implications by using legal finance capital. Further, your competitors who are already using legal finance are opting out three times more often. As a former GC, I recognize the importance of maintaining control and maximizing returns in litigation, and Burford works with many GCs to use legal finance to reduce risk, maintain greater control and enhance the likelihood of achieving greater recoveries.”

Key findings from the research include:

  • Use of legal finance correlates to opting out.
    • Use of legal finance is 3x likelier among companies that mostly/always opt out vs. companies that mostly/always remain in the class, and 2x likelier than all companies.
  • Companies’ top reasons for opting out are maintaining control and maximizing return.
    • The #1 reason large company GCs opt out is their fiduciary duty to maximize recoveries to their company.
  • Companies’ top reasons to stay in the class are economic.
    • Not being able to justify the cost of pursuing an opt out claim (64%) and not having the budget to do so (61%) are the top 2 reasons companies remain in the class.
    • Legal finance ameliorates both cost and budget constraints.
  • GCs say the availability of legal finance would impact their opt out strategy.
    • 1 of 2 (52%) say that while they have not used legal finance, its availability would positively impact the decision to opt out. 

The Report on Class Action Recoveries can be downloaded on Burford’s website, where full results are also available. The research report was conducted in June 2022 by GLG via an online survey, with responses from 150 US GCs, heads of litigation and other senior in-house lawyers responsible for their companies’ commercial litigation.

About Burford Capital

Burford Capital is the leading global finance and asset management firm focused on law. Its businesses include litigation finance and risk management, asset recovery and a wide range of legal finance and advisory activities. Burford is publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE: BUR) and the London Stock Exchange (LSE: BUR), and it works with companies and law firms around the world from its principal offices in New York, London, Chicago, Washington, DC, Singapore, Sydney and Hong Kong.

For more information, please visit www.burfordcapital.com.

Commercial

View All
Commercial

Burford Capital Says $700 Million Cash Position Keeps Growth Plans on Track After YPF Setback

By John Freund |

Burford Capital issued a follow-up statement on March 30 addressing the financial fallout from the Second Circuit's reversal of the $16.1 billion judgment against Argentina in the long-running YPF nationalization dispute.

As reported by PR Newswire, the litigation funder emphasized that the ruling has no cash impact on its operations, pointing to more than $700 million in cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities on hand. The company said its diversified portfolio routinely delivers cash proceeds independent of the YPF asset and reaffirmed plans to double its portfolio by 2030 without additional borrowing.

Burford expects a substantial GAAP write-down of the YPF asset as of March 31, with full details to be disclosed in its first-quarter results in the first half of May. Management noted the write-down is a non-cash accounting adjustment that does not affect operational cash flow.

Looking ahead, Burford signaled it may pursue arbitration through the World Bank's International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes under bilateral investment treaties. The company argued Argentina breached investment protections during the 2012 expropriation, though it acknowledged any ICSID proceeding would be a multi-year process.

The statement comes days after Burford shares cratered more than 45% following the Second Circuit's March 27 decision, which found Argentina's nationalization of YPF was governed by public law rather than private corporate bylaws, rendering the breach-of-contract claims non-cognizable.

Commercial

Cadence Minerals Secures Litigation Funding for Arbitration Against Mexico Over Lithium Nationalization

By John Freund |

Cadence Minerals has obtained third-party litigation funding to pursue an international arbitration claim against Mexico following the cancellation of its mining concessions during the country's lithium sector nationalization.

As reported by Investing.com via bilaterals.org, LCM Funding SG Pty Ltd has approved financing for the arbitration on a non-recourse basis, meaning Cadence and its subsidiary REM Mexico Limited have no obligation to repay if the claims are unsuccessful. The funding arrangement is designed to allow the company to pursue the case while preserving its balance sheet flexibility.

Cadence and REM Mexico allege that Mexico violated the UK-Mexico bilateral investment treaty by canceling concessions tied to the Sonora Lithium Project. The claims include unlawful expropriation and failure to provide fair and equitable treatment to foreign investors.

CEO Kiran Morzaria said the funding "materially strengthens our ability to pursue the arbitration in an appropriately resourced manner." The company indicated it remains open to negotiated settlement discussions with the Mexican government.

The case highlights the growing role of litigation funding in investor-state dispute settlement, where resource companies increasingly turn to third-party funders to pursue treaty-based claims against sovereign governments over nationalization and regulatory actions.

Commercial

JPMorgan Asset Arm Enters Litigation Finance With Mass Tort Fee Investments

By John Freund |

JPMorgan Asset Management has made its entry into the litigation finance sector by advancing funds to two major mass tort law firms, marking a significant milestone as one of the world's largest financial institutions moves into the legal funding space.

As reported by Bloomberg Law, the investments were made through JPMorgan's Lynstone Special Situations Fund II, a $2.4 billion fund closed in June 2022. The deals involve post-settlement arrangements with Seeger Weiss and Simmons Hanly Conroy, two prominent plaintiffs' firms.

The structure allows law firms to receive accelerated payments for attorneys' fees that have already been earned but not yet collected. Investors profit when final fee payments exceed their initial advances, with returns typically falling in the low double digits. Because the deals are completed after settlements have been reached, they carry significantly less risk than traditional litigation funding tied to case outcomes.

Seeger Weiss serves as lead counsel in Ozempic and Depo-Provera litigation and played a key role in opioid settlements. Simmons Hanly Conroy received 11.4% of a $2.14 billion opioid litigation fee fund and led Norfolk Southern derailment litigation.

JPMorgan's move follows a broader trend of institutional investors entering litigation finance. Fortress Investment Group, BlackRock, and Davidson Kempner Capital Management are among the major firms increasingly active in legal asset investments, drawn by returns that are uncorrelated with equity markets. Commercial litigation funders deployed $2.8 billion in new commitments last year across 346 deals.